Effectiveness of a Virtual Laboratory as a preparatory resource for Distance Education chemistry students

Many have argued that interactive 3D virtual environments have great educational potential due to their ability to engage learners in the exploration, construction and manipulation of virtual objects, structures and metaphorical representations of ideas. Although learning benefits have been demonstrated in research settings, and substantial usage has occurred in workplace training contexts, there are few published evaluations of applications of such environments within university contexts. This article reports on studies exploring the effectiveness of a virtual environment based on a chemistry laboratory as a tool to prepare university chemistry students studying at a distance for their on-campus residential schools, in response to evidence suggesting that many of these students experienced a lack of confidence and a sense of anxiety approaching these sessions. In an experimental study it was found that the environment was able to be effective as a tool for familiarising students with the laboratory. However, when the resource was provided to distance students, less than half of the students chose to use it, possibly due to the fact that use of the resource was not required for the assessment in the subject. Questionnaire and interview data suggested that most of those who used the resource found that it was a valuable preparatory tool and would recommend its further use. For many students, however, a lack of familiarity with the laboratory was not seen as the major source of their anxiety and therefore a resource allowing them to become familiar with the laboratory did not have a major impact on their learning experience. Given that the ability to apply mathematical techniques and chemistry concepts within the practical sessions emerged as a major source of students' anxiety, it is suggested that the incorporation of instruction or scaffolding for these aspects of the task can be provided, and would make a valuable enhancement to the virtual environment.

[1]  Mare Taagepera,et al.  Assessing the Effect of Web-Based Learning Tools on Student Understanding of Stoichiometry Using Knowledge Space Theory , 2005 .

[2]  Erwin Boschmann Teaching Chemistry via Distance Education , 2003 .

[3]  George S. Carson,et al.  Developing the VRML 97 International Standard , 1999, IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications.

[4]  Alan Wexelblat,et al.  Virtual reality applications and explorations , 1993 .

[5]  Michael W. McGreevy Virtual Reality and Planetary Exploration , 1992 .

[6]  R. Eddy Chemophobia in the College Classroom: Extent, Sources, and Student Characteristics , 2000 .

[7]  Danny Bedgood,et al.  On the path to improving our teaching - reflection on best practices in teaching chemistry , 2003 .

[8]  TIM R.H. CUTMORE,et al.  Cognitive and gender factors influencing navigation in a virtual environment , 2000, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[9]  Marissa Rollnick,et al.  Improving pre-laboratory preparation of first year university chemistry students , 2001 .

[10]  Maria T. Oliver-Hoyo,et al.  Attitudinal Effects of a Student-Centered Active Learning Environment , 2005 .

[11]  C. W. Bowen,et al.  Development and Score Validation of a Chemistry Laboratory Anxiety Instrument (Clai) for College Chemistry Students , 1999 .

[12]  Barney Dalgarno,et al.  The potential of virtual laboratories for distance education science teaching: reflections from the development and evaluation of a virtual chemistry laboratory , 2012 .

[13]  Jorge Trindade,et al.  Science learning in virtual environments: a descriptive study , 2002, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[14]  Pilar Martínez-Jiménez,et al.  Learning in Chemistry with Virtual Laboratories , 2003 .

[15]  L. Pogačnik,et al.  How to Motivate Students to Study before They Enter the Lab. , 2006 .

[16]  Robert B. Kozma,et al.  Use of Simultaneous-Synchronized Macroscopic, Microscopic, and Symbolic Representations To Enhance the Teaching and Learning of Chemical Concepts , 1997 .

[17]  Dietmar Kennepohl,et al.  Teaching Chemistry at Canada's Open University , 2000 .

[18]  M. Prensky Do They Really Think Differently , 2001 .

[19]  John H. Bailey,et al.  Virtual spaces and real world places: transfer of route knowledge , 1996, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[20]  Roy A. Ruddle,et al.  Navigating Large-Scale Virtual Environments: What Differences Occur Between Helmet-Mounted and Desk-Top Displays? , 1999, Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments.

[21]  M. Prensky Digital Natives, Digital Immigrants , 2001 .

[22]  Julia Diederen,et al.  Evaluation of computer-based learning material for food chemistry education , 2005 .

[23]  Gregory L. Waddoups,et al.  The "Virtual ChemLab" Project: A Realistic and Sophisticated Simulation of Organic Synthesis and Organic Qualitative Analysis , 2005 .

[24]  M. Prensky Digital Natives, Digital Immigrants Part 1 , 2001 .

[25]  M. Humphreys,et al.  Personality, motivation, and performance: a theory of the relationship between individual differences and information processing. , 1984, Psychological review.