Osseous invasion by soft-tissue sarcoma: assessment with MR imaging.

PURPOSE To assess magnetic resonance (MR) imaging signs and overall accuracy of MR imaging for detection of osseous invasion by soft-tissue sarcoma, with histopathologic correlation as the reference standard. MATERIALS AND METHODS Preoperative MR images (1.5 T, transverse and longitudinal planes, T1 and T2 weighted) of 56 osseous sites in 51 patients who underwent bone resection at surgery for soft-tissue sarcoma were assessed retrospectively for signs of osseous invasion, by consensus of two readers who were blinded to clinical and histopathologic findings. Delay between MR imaging and surgery averaged 34 days (range, 2-112 days). MR signs assessed included osseous abutment by tumor, maximal diameter of osseous abutment, extent of circumferential abutment of long bones (<25%, 25%-50%, >50%), cortical destruction, and cortical and medullary signal intensity change on T1- and T2-weighted images. Imaging findings were correlated with histopathologic findings. Sensitivities, specificities, positive and negative predictive values (PPV, NPV), and P values were calculated. RESULTS Eleven sites (20%) showed osseous invasion histologically (two, cortical; nine, both cortical and medullary). Tumor abutted bone at 44 lesion sites (sensitivity, 100%; specificity, 27%). Maximal diameter of osseous abutment and extent of circumferential abutment did not significantly affect osseous invasion (P =.09 and.11, respectively). On T1- and T2-weighted images, 13 lesion sites showed cortical signal intensity change (sensitivity, 100%; specificity, 96%) and 10 showed cortical destruction (sensitivity, 82%; specificity, 98%). Eleven sites showed decreased medullary T1 signal intensity (sensitivity, 100%; specificity, 96%), and 12 showed increased medullary T2 signal intensity (sensitivity, 100%; specificity, 94%). MR imaging overall had a sensitivity of 100%, specificity of 93%, PPV of 79%, and NPV of 100% for detection of osseous invasion on the basis of any finding of cortical destruction or cortical or medullary signal intensity change on T1- or T2-weighted images (P <.001). CONCLUSION On T1- and T2-weighted MR images, findings of cortical and medullary signal intensity change and cortical destruction were sensitive and specific for detection of osseous invasion by soft-tissue sarcoma.

[1]  K. Watanabe,et al.  Multiple Fractionated and Single-Dose Irradiation of Bone Marrow , 1998, Acta radiologica.

[2]  D. Panicek,et al.  Soft-tissue sarcoma involving bone or neurovascular structures: MR imaging prognostic factors. , 1997, Radiology.

[3]  D Resnick,et al.  Measurements of cortical thickness in experimentally created endosteal bone lesions: a comparison of radiography, CT, MR imaging, and anatomic sections. , 1997, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[4]  B. McNeil,et al.  CT and MR imaging in the local staging of primary malignant musculoskeletal neoplasms: Report of the Radiology Diagnostic Oncology Group. , 1997, Radiology.

[5]  M. Kransdorf,et al.  The use of gadolinium in the MR evaluation of soft tissue tumors. , 1997, Seminars in ultrasound, CT, and MR.

[6]  E Onikul,et al.  Accuracy of MR imaging for estimating intraosseous extent of osteosarcoma. , 1996, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[7]  E. Conrad,et al.  MR characterization of post-irradiation soft tissue edema , 1996, Skeletal Radiology.

[8]  M. Kransdorf.  Malignant soft-tissue tumors in a large referral population: distribution of diagnoses by age, sex, and location. , 1995, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[9]  H. Imhof,et al.  Preoperative staging of osteosarcoma: efficacy of MR imaging in detecting joint involvement. , 1994, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[10]  R. Gilles,et al.  MR imaging in the follow-up of malignant and aggressive soft-tissue tumors: results of 511 examinations. , 1994, Radiology.

[11]  C. Catton,et al.  Outcome and prognostic factors in soft tissue sarcoma in the adult. , 1993, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[12]  T. Peabody,et al.  Principles of Staging of Soft‐Tissue Sarcomas , 1993, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[13]  E. Conrad,et al.  Comparison of STIR and spin-echo MR imaging at 1.5 T in 45 suspected extremity tumors: lesion conspicuity and extent. , 1991, Radiology.

[14]  I. Kaplan,et al.  Early and late bone-marrow changes after irradiation: MR evaluation. , 1990, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[15]  D. Sartoris,et al.  Osseous invasion by soft-tissue sarcoma seen better on MR than on CT. , 1989, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[16]  G. Westbury,et al.  Pre‐operative assessment of soft tissue sarcomas by computed tomography , 1987, The British journal of surgery.

[17]  W. Enneking,et al.  A System for the Surgical Staging of Musculoskeletal Sarcoma , 1980, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[18]  E. Levinsohn,et al.  Computed tomography in the evaluation of sarcomatous tumors of the thigh. , 1978, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.