Acoustic sensor networks for woodpecker localization

Sensor network technology can revolutionize the study of animal ecology by providing a means of non-intrusive, simultaneous monitoring of interaction among multiple animals. In this paper, we investigate design, analysis, and testing of acoustic arrays for localizing acorn woodpeckers using their vocalizations. Each acoustic array consists of four microphones arranged in a square. All four audio channels within the same acoustic array are finely synchronized within a few micro seconds. We apply the approximate maximum likelihood (AML) method to synchronized audio channels of each acoustic array for estimating the direction-of-arrival (DOA) of woodpecker vocalizations. The woodpecker location is estimated by applying least square (LS) methods to DOA bearing crossings of multiple acoustic arrays. We have revealed the critical relation between microphone spacing of acoustic arrays and robustness of beamforming of woodpecker vocalizations. Woodpecker localization experiments using robust array element spacing in different types of environments are conducted and compared. Practical issues about calibration of acoustic array orientation are also discussed.

[1]  L. Freitag,et al.  Passive acoustic localization of the Atlantic bottlenose dolphin using whistles and echolocation clicks. , 1993, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[2]  Ralph Otto Schmidt,et al.  A signal subspace approach to multiple emitter location and spectral estimation , 1981 .

[3]  R. E. Hudson,et al.  Numerical Implementation of AML algorithm for Wideband DOA Estimation,â , 2003 .

[4]  Kung Yao,et al.  Maximum-likelihood source localization and unknown sensor location estimation for wideband signals in the near-field , 2002, IEEE Trans. Signal Process..

[5]  Peter K. McGregor,et al.  Accuracy of a passive acoustic location system: empirical studies in terrestrial habitats , 1997 .

[6]  Scott C. Burleigh,et al.  Environmental Studies with the Sensor Web: Principles and Practice , 2005, Sensors (Basel, Switzerland).

[7]  Kung Yao,et al.  Numerical implemention of the AML algorithm for wideband DOA estimation , 2003, SPIE Optics + Photonics.

[8]  Vincent M. Stanford,et al.  An Automated Acoustic System to Monitor and Classify Birds , 2006, EURASIP J. Adv. Signal Process..

[9]  Deborah Estrin,et al.  Target classification and localization in habitat monitoring , 2003, 2003 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing, 2003. Proceedings. (ICASSP '03)..

[10]  Sanjay Jha,et al.  The design and evaluation of a hybrid sensor network for cane-toad monitoring , 2005, IPSN 2005. Fourth International Symposium on Information Processing in Sensor Networks, 2005..

[11]  Mani Srivastava,et al.  Overview of sensor networks , 2004 .

[12]  Ralph E. Hudson,et al.  Source localization and time delay estimation using constrained least-squares and best-path smoothing , 1999, Optics & Photonics.

[13]  Ilan Ziskind,et al.  Maximum likelihood localization of multiple sources by alternating projection , 1988, IEEE Trans. Acoust. Speech Signal Process..

[14]  Mark G. Terwilliger,et al.  Overview of Sensor Networks , 2004 .

[15]  Ian F. Akyildiz,et al.  Wireless sensor networks: a survey , 2002, Comput. Networks.