A generic approach to analyze the impact of a future aircraft design on the boarding process

The turnaround process constitutes an important part of the air transportation system. Airports often represent bottlenecks in air traffic management (ATM), thus operations related to the preparation of the aircraft for the next flight leg have to be executed smoothly and in a timely manner. The ATM significantly depends on a reliable turnaround process. Future paradigm changes with respect to airplane energy sources, aircraft design or propulsion concepts will also influence the airport layout. As a consequence, operational processes associated with the turnaround will be affected. Airlines aim for efficient and timely turnaround operations that are correlated with higher profits. This case study discusses an approach to investigate a new aircraft design with respect to the implications on the turnaround. The boarding process, as part of the turnaround, serves as an example to evaluate the consequences of new design concepts. This study is part of an interdisciplinary research to investigate future energy, propulsion and designs concepts and their implications on the whole ATM system. Due to these new concepts, several processes of the turnaround will be affected. For example, new energy storage concepts will influence the fueling process on the aircraft itself or might lead to a new infrastructure at the airport. This paper aims to evaluate the applied methodology in the case of a new boarding process, due to a new aircraft design, by means of a generic example. An agent-based boarding simulation is applied to assess passenger behavior during boarding, particularly with regard to cabin layout and seat configuration. The results of the generic boarding simulation are integrated into a simplified, deterministic and generic simulation of the turnaround process. This was done to assess the proposed framework for future investigations which on the one hand address the ATM system holistically and on the other, incorporate additional or adapted processes of the turnaround.

[1]  Michael Schmidt,et al.  Novel Aircraft Ground Operation Concepts Based on Clustering of Interfaces , 2015 .

[2]  M. Schultz,et al.  Managing Passenger Handling at Airport Terminals , 2011 .

[3]  Peter Horst,et al.  Exploring Vehicle Level Benefits of Revolutionary Technology Progress via Aircraft Design and Optimization , 2018 .

[4]  Michael J. North,et al.  Toward teaching agent-based simulation , 2010, Proceedings of the 2010 Winter Simulation Conference.

[5]  Raimund Rolfes,et al.  A Structural Design Concept for a Multi-Shell Blended Wing Body with Laminar Flow Control , 2018 .

[6]  Greet Vanden Berghe,et al.  Multi-Agent Based Simulation for Boarding , 2009 .

[7]  Joerg C. Fuchte,et al.  Enhancement of Aircraft Cabin Design Guidelines with Special Consideration of Aircraft Turnaround and Short Range Operations , 2014 .

[8]  R. Huston.  Principles of Biomechanics , 2008 .

[9]  Michael Schmidt,et al.  A review of aircraft turnaround operations and simulations , 2017 .

[10]  Florian Jaehn,et al.  Airplane boarding , 2015, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[11]  Wei Li,et al.  Extensible Discrete-Event Simulation framework in SimEvents , 2016, 2016 Winter Simulation Conference (WSC).

[12]  J. Rene Villalobos,et al.  The Aircraft Boarding Problem , 2003 .

[13]  Nils Beck,et al.  Drag reduction by laminar flow control , 2018 .

[14]  Michael Schultz,et al.  Boarding on the critical path of the turnaround , 2013 .

[15]  K. McFadden,et al.  A study of the airline boarding problem , 2008 .

[16]  Mirko Hornung,et al.  BOARDING PROCESS ASSESSMENT OF NOVEL AIRCRAFT CABIN CONCEPTS , 2016 .

[17]  Economic Impact of Airplane turn times , 2022 .

[18]  Michael Schultz,et al.  Aircraft Boarding - Data, Validation, Analysis , 2017 .

[19]  Michael Schmidt,et al.  Boarding and Turnaround Process Assessment of Single- and Twin-Aisle Aircraft , 2017 .

[20]  Michael Schultz,et al.  Efficiency of Aircraft Boarding Procedures , 2008 .

[21]  Michael Schmidt,et al.  PAXelerate - An Open Source Passenger Flow Simulation Framework for Advanced Aircraft Cabin Layouts , 2016 .

[22]  Cheng-Lung Wu,et al.  Aircraft operational costs and turnaround efficiency at airports , 2000 .