Efficient methodology for seismic fragility curves estimation by active learning on Support Vector Machines

Abstract Fragility curves which express the failure probability of a structure as function of a loading intensity measure are nowadays widely used to facilitate the design and decision making of structures/infrastructures against seismic hazard (and possibly other natural hazards), with analysis procedures specified by Seismic Probabilistic Risk Assessment, Performance-Based Earthquake Engineering, and other frameworks. To avoid the use of parametric models (such as the lognormal model) to estimate fragility curves from a reduced number of numerical calculations, a methodology based on Support Vector Machines (SVMs) coupled with an active learning algorithm is proposed in this paper. In practice, input excitation is reduced to some relevant parameters and then SVMs are used for a binary classification of the structural responses relative to a limit threshold of exceedance. Since the output is not binary but a real-valued score, a probabilistic interpretation of the output is exploited to estimate very efficiently fragility curves as score functions or as functions of classical seismic intensity measures.

[1]  S. Levy,et al.  Generation of artificial time-histories, rich in all frequencies, from given response spectra , 1976 .

[2]  F. Sabetta,et al.  Estimation of response spectra and simulation of nonstationary earthquake ground motions , 1996, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America.

[4]  R. P. Kennedy,et al.  Probabilistic seismic safety study of an existing nuclear power plant , 1980 .

[5]  C. Cornell,et al.  Vector-valued Intensity Measures Incorporating Spectral Shape For Prediction of Structural Response , 2008 .

[6]  Paolo Bazzurro,et al.  Exploring Risk-Targeted Hazard Maps for Europe , 2016 .

[7]  Alexandros A. Taflanidis,et al.  Kriging metamodeling in seismic risk assessment based on stochastic ground motion models , 2015 .

[8]  Vikram Pakrashi,et al.  Fragility analysis of steel and concrete wind turbine towers , 2012 .

[9]  Anne S. Kiremidjian,et al.  Development of empirical and analytical fragility functions using kernel smoothing methods , 2015 .

[10]  A. Kiureghian,et al.  Aleatory or epistemic? Does it matter? , 2009 .

[11]  Victor E. Saouma,et al.  Probabilistic seismic demand model and optimal intensity measure for concrete dams , 2016 .

[12]  Chu V. Mai,et al.  Seismic fragility curves for structures using non-parametric representations , 2017, Frontiers of Structural and Civil Engineering.

[13]  Jian Zhang,et al.  Evaluating effectiveness and optimum design of isolation devices for highway bridges using the fragility function method , 2009 .

[14]  Armen Der Kiureghian,et al.  Simulation of synthetic ground motions for specified earthquake and site characteristics , 2010 .

[15]  Daphne Koller,et al.  Support Vector Machine Active Learning with Applications to Text Classification , 2000, J. Mach. Learn. Res..

[16]  Junwon Seo,et al.  Use of response surface metamodels to generate system level fragilities for existing curved steel bridges , 2013 .

[17]  Danijel Skocaj,et al.  Multivariate online kernel density estimation with Gaussian kernels , 2011, Pattern Recognit..

[18]  Reginald DesRoches,et al.  Selection of optimal intensity measures in probabilistic seismic demand models of highway bridge portfolios , 2008 .

[19]  Michalis F. Vassiliou,et al.  Is rocking motion predictable? , 2018 .

[20]  I. Zentner Numerical computation of fragility curves for NPP equipment , 2010 .

[21]  Nicola Pedroni,et al.  Seismic fragility analysis with artificial neural networks: Application to nuclear power plant equipment , 2018 .

[22]  Fan WANG,et al.  SEISMIC FRAGILITY CURVE ESTIMATION USING SIGNALS GENERATED WITH GMPE-CASE STUDY ON THE KASHIWAZAKI-KARIWA POWER PLANT , 2017 .

[23]  Holger Schoener,et al.  Active Learning with Neural Networks , 2007 .

[24]  Irmela Zentner,et al.  Enrichment of seismic ground motion databases using Karhunen–Loève expansion , 2012 .

[26]  Gérard Dreyfus,et al.  Towards the Optimal Design of Numerical Experiments , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks.

[27]  Sungmoon Jung,et al.  Structural performance of a parked wind turbine tower subjected to strong ground motions , 2016 .

[28]  Irmela Zentner,et al.  A general framework for the estimation of analytical fragility functions based on multivariate probability distributions , 2017 .

[29]  Kevin R. Mackie,et al.  Probabilistic Seismic Demand Model for California Highway Bridges , 2001 .

[30]  Christian Igel,et al.  Active learning with support vector machines , 2014, WIREs Data Mining Knowl. Discov..

[31]  A. Chopra,et al.  Evaluation of the exact conditional spectrum and generalized conditional intensity measure methods for ground motion selection , 2016 .

[32]  Vasant Matsagar,et al.  Uncertainty quantification and seismic fragility of base-isolated liquid storage tanks using response surface models , 2016 .

[33]  Ludovic Margerin,et al.  Nonstationary Stochastic Simulation of Strong Ground Motion Time Histories Including Natural Variability: Application to the K-Net Japanese Database , 2006 .

[34]  R. Adler The Geometry of Random Fields , 2009 .

[35]  Nicolas Luco,et al.  Structure-Specific Scalar Intensity Measures for Near-Source and Ordinary Earthquake Ground Motions , 2007 .

[36]  Alexandros A. Taflanidis,et al.  Modification of stochastic ground motion models for matching target intensity measures , 2017 .

[37]  Sanaz Rezaeian,et al.  Stochastic Modeling and Simulation of Ground Motions for Performance-Based Earthquake Engineering , 2010 .

[38]  Ahmed Ghobarah,et al.  Performance-based design in earthquake engineering: state of development , 2001 .

[39]  Fernando Lopez-Caballero,et al.  EFFECT OF THE INELASTIC DYNAMIC SOIL–STRUCTURE INTERACTION ON THE SEISMIC VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT , 2011 .

[40]  Jamie E. Padgett,et al.  Storm surge fragility assessment of above ground storage tanks , 2018 .

[41]  Luis Esteva,et al.  Comparing the adequacy of alternative ground motion intensity measures for the estimation of structural responses , 2004 .

[42]  H Y Kim,et al.  STATISTICAL ANALYSIS OF FRAGILITY CURVES , 2000 .

[43]  H. Sebastian Seung,et al.  Query by committee , 1992, COLT '92.

[44]  I. Zentner,et al.  Parametric models averaging for optimized non-parametric fragility curve estimation based on intensity measure data clustering , 2019, Structural Safety.

[45]  Bruce R. Ellingwood,et al.  Quantifying and communicating uncertainty in seismic risk assessment , 2009 .

[46]  Jack W. Baker,et al.  Efficient Analytical Fragility Function Fitting Using Dynamic Structural Analysis , 2015 .

[47]  Armen Der Kiureghian,et al.  A stochastic ground motion model with separable temporal and spectral nonstationarities , 2008 .

[48]  Joonam Park,et al.  Rapid seismic damage assessment of railway bridges using the response-surface statistical model , 2014 .

[49]  N. N. Pujari,et al.  Seismic fragility analysis of a typical Indian PHWR containment: Comparison of fragility models , 2016 .

[50]  Michalis F. Vassiliou,et al.  The three‐dimensional behavior of inverted pendulum cylindrical structures during earthquakes , 2017 .