RETRACTED ARTICLE: Delayed versus early pushing during the second stage of labour in primigravidas under epidural anaesthesia with occipitoposterior malposition: a randomised controlled study

Abstract This randomised controlled trial aimed to compare the effect of early and delayed pushing during the second stage of labour in women with occipitoposterior (OP) malposition. It included 184 nulliparous women with OP position randomised to early pushing in which women were allowed to push within one hour after full cervical dilatation or delayed pushing in which women were asked not to push for maximum of three hours or start pushing when the vertex was visible. The primary outcome was successful vaginal delivery. The rate of spontaneous vaginal delivery was significantly higher in the early pushing group (80.4 vs. 60.9%, p=.004) while the rate of instrumental vaginal delivery (30.4 vs. 15.4%) and CS (8.7 vs. 4.3%) was significantly higher in the delayed pushing group. Women in the delayed pushing group showed a significantly longer duration of the second stage (129.4 ± 7.5 vs. 61.6 ± 15.3 minutes, p<.001) and shorter duration of pushing (219.8 ± 74.8 vs. 693.9 ± 145.2 seconds, p<.001) .The rate of 2nd and 3rd degree perineal lacerations (19.6 and 13% vs. 5.4 and 8.7% respectively, p=.013) and vaginal tears (41.3 vs. 8.7%, p<.001) was significantly higher in the early pushing group. We concluded that early pushing during the second stage of labour is associated with higher rates of spontaneous vaginal delivery and vaginal and perineal lacerations. Clinical trial registration NCT03121274. Impact Statement What is already known on this subject? Occipitoposterior malposition is common during delivery especially in primigravida and is associated with higher rates of instrumental delivery and caesarean section. It can be managed through early or delayed pushing. What the results of this study add? Early pushing is associated with higher rates of spontaneous vaginal delivery, perineal and vaginal tears, shorter duration of second stage of labour, shorter duration of pushing, lower rates of both instrumental vaginal delivery and caesarean section. What the implications are of these findings for clinical practice and/or further research? Early pushing during the second stage of labour is associated with higher rates of spontaneous vaginal delivery and vaginal and perineal lacerations in women with OP malposition and should be tried and not delaying the pushing.

[1]  Kizito Omona Vaginal Delivery , 2020, Midwifery [Working Title].

[2]  K. Kwak,et al.  Neuraxial analgesia: a review of its effects on the outcome and duration of labor , 2013, Korean journal of anesthesiology.

[3]  J. Ludlow,et al.  Does occiput posterior position in the second stage of labour increase the operative delivery rate? , 2013, The Australian & New Zealand journal of obstetrics & gynaecology.

[4]  A. Samueloff,et al.  Digital rotation from occipito-posterior to occipito-anterior decreases the need for cesarean section. , 2008, European journal of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive biology.

[5]  Y. Ginosar,et al.  Changes in fetal position during labor and their association with epidural analgesia. , 2005, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[6]  W. Fraser,et al.  Effect of Fetal Position on Second-Stage Duration and Labor Outcome , 2005, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[7]  C. Roberts,et al.  Delayed versus early pushing in women with epidural analgesia: a systematic review and meta‐analysis , 2004, BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology.

[8]  A. Peaceman,et al.  Management of the Second Stage of Labor in Nulliparas With Continuous Epidural Analgesia , 2003, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[9]  D. Ellwood,et al.  Prevalence and persistence of health problems after childbirth: associations with parity and method of birth. , 2002, Birth.

[10]  B. Leighton,et al.  The effects of epidural analgesia on labor, maternal, and neonatal outcomes: a systematic review. , 2002, American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology.

[11]  S. Clark,et al.  Active Pushing Versus Passive Fetal Descent in the Second Stage of Labor: A Randomized Controlled Trial , 2002, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[12]  C. Howell Epidural versus non-epidural analgesia for pain relief in labour. , 1999, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[13]  E. Lieberman,et al.  Association of Epidural Analgesia With Cesarean Delivery in Nulliparas , 1996, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[14]  M. Pearl,et al.  Vaginal delivery from the persistent occiput posterior position. Influence on maternal and neonatal morbidity. , 1993, The Journal of reproductive medicine.

[15]  D. Moir,et al.  Extradural Analgesia: The Influence of Volume and Concentration of Bupivacaine on the Mode of Delivery, Analgesic Efficacy, and Motor Block , 1981, British journal of anaesthesia.

[16]  B LOGAN,et al.  Obstetrics and Gynecology , 1917, Edinburgh Medical Journal.