Judging the contact-times of multiple objects: Evidence for asymmetric interference.

The accuracy of time-to-contact (TTC) judgments for single approaching objects is well researched, however, close to nothing is known about our ability to make simultaneous TTC judgments for two or more objects. Such complex judgments are required in many everyday situations, for instance when crossing a multi-lane street or when engaged in multi-player ball games. We used a prediction-motion paradigm in which participants simultaneously estimated the absolute TTC of two objects, and compared the performance to a standard single-object condition. Results showed that the order of arrival of the two objects determined the accuracy of the TTC estimates: Estimation of the first-arriving object was unaffected by the added complexity compared to the one-object condition, whereas the TTC of the second-arriving object was systematically overestimated. This result has broad implications for complex everyday situations. We suggest that it is akin to effects observed in experiments on the psychological refractory period (PRP) and that the proactive interference of the first-arriving object indicates a bottleneck or capacity sharing at the central stage.

[1]  Françoise Macar,et al.  Time, Action and Cognition , 1992 .

[2]  N. Taatgen,et al.  Timing of multiple overlapping intervals: how many clocks do we have? , 2008, Acta psychologica.

[3]  Michel-Ange Amorim,et al.  Motion prediction and the velocity effect in children , 2008 .

[4]  P. Hancock,et al.  Influence of Approach Angle on Estimates of Time-To-Contact , 1996 .

[5]  Patricia R. Delucia,et al.  Judgments of relative time-to-contact of more than two approaching objects: Toward a method , 1997, Perception & psychophysics.

[6]  W Schiff,et al.  Information Used in Judging Impending Collision , 1979, Perception.

[7]  David N. Lee,et al.  A Theory of Visual Control of Braking Based on Information about Time-to-Collision , 1976, Perception.

[8]  H. Hecht,et al.  Time-to-contact , 2004 .

[9]  F. C. Bakker,et al.  Catching balls: how to get the hand to the right place at the right time. , 1994, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[10]  N Benguigui,et al.  Effects of tennis practice on the coincidence timing accuracy of adults and children. , 1998, Research quarterly for exercise and sport.

[11]  Y. Hochberg.  A sharper Bonferroni procedure for multiple tests of significance , 1988 .

[12]  Scott W. Brown.  Attentional resources in timing: Interference effects in concurrent temporal and nontemporal working memory tasks , 1997, Perception & psychophysics.

[13]  S L Zeger,et al.  Regression analysis for correlated data. , 1993, Annual review of public health.

[14]  J. Tresilian.  Hitting a moving target: Perception and action in the timing of rapid interceptions , 2005, Perception & psychophysics.

[15]  Eric Ruthruff,et al.  Attentional Limitations in Doing Two Tasks at Once , 2006 .

[16]  Pierre Jolicoeur,et al.  Testing the predictions of the central capacity sharing model. , 2005, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[17]  M. Kenward,et al.  Small sample inference for fixed effects from restricted maximum likelihood. , 1997, Biometrics.

[18]  P. Jolicoeur,et al.  A central capacity sharing model of dual-task performance. , 2003, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[19]  S. W. Brown,et al.  Multiple timing and the allocation of attention. , 1990, Acta psychologica.

[20]  P R DeLucia,et al.  Cognitive motion extrapolation and cognitive clocking in prediction motion task. , 1998, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[21]  François Maquestiaux,et al.  Can practice overcome age-related differences in the psychological refractory period effect? , 2004, Psychology and aging.

[22]  D. Rosenbaum.  Perception and extrapolation of velocity and acceleration. , 1975 .

[23]  Heiko Hecht,et al.  Effects of a moving distractor object on time-to-contact judgments. , 2008, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[24]  Russell D. Wolfinger,et al.  The Analysis of Repeated Measurements with Mixed-Model Adjusted F Tests , 2004 .

[25]  H. Pashler.  Dual-task interference in simple tasks: data and theory. , 1994, Psychological bulletin.

[26]  H Pashler,et al.  Dual-task interference and the cerebral hemispheres. , 1993, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[27]  Françoise Macar,et al.  Time, action, and cognition : towards bridging the gap , 1992 .

[28]  Claudette Fortin,et al.  Attention sharing during timing: Modulation by processing demands of an expected stimulus , 2008, Perception & psychophysics.

[29]  R. Block,et al.  The role of attention in time estimation processes , 1996 .

[30]  John Anderson,et al.  An integrated theory of prospective time interval estimation: the role of cognition, attention, and learning. , 2007, Psychological review.

[31]  P. Burton,et al.  Extending the simple linear regression model to account for correlated responses: an introduction to generalized estimating equations and multi-level mixed modelling. , 1998, Statistics in medicine.

[32]  Jennifer Linda Blume Novak,et al.  Judgments of absolute time-to-contact in multiple object displays: evaluating the role of cognitive processes in arrival-time judgements , 1997 .

[33]  C. W. Telford.  The refractory phase of voluntary and associative responses , 1931 .

[34]  Y. Stern,et al.  Evidence for Age-related Changes to Temporal Attention and Memory from the Choice Time Production Task , 2009, Neuropsychology, development, and cognition. Section B, Aging, neuropsychology and cognition.

[35]  D. Navon,et al.  Queuing or Sharing? A Critical Evaluation of the Single-Bottleneck Notion , 2002, Cognitive Psychology.

[36]  H. Huynh,et al.  Estimation of the Box Correction for Degrees of Freedom from Sample Data in Randomized Block and Split-Plot Designs , 1976 .

[37]  J. Artieda,et al.  Time, internal clocks, and movement , 1996 .

[38]  Eric Ruthruff,et al.  Bypassing the central bottleneck after single-task practice in the psychological refractory period paradigm: Evidence for task automatization and greedy resource recruitment , 2008, Memory & cognition.

[39]  J T Todd,et al.  Visual information about moving objects. , 1981, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[40]  N. Taatgen,et al.  The problem state: a cognitive bottleneck in multitasking. , 2010, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[41]  H. J. Keselman,et al.  Stepwise and Simultaneous Multiple Comparison Procedures of Repeated Measures’ Means , 1994 .

[42]  Patricia R DeLucia,et al.  Time-to-contact judgments of an approaching object that is partially concealed by an occluder. , 2004, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[43]  Scott W. Brown,et al.  Attention, Multiple Timing, and Psychophysical Scaling of Temporal Judgments , 1992 .

[44]  J. Tresilian,et al.  Systematic Variation in Performance of an Interceptive Action with Changes in the Temporal Constraints , 2005, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.