Joint Optimization of Test Node Selection and Fiber Thread Connection for Optical Communication Network

This paper proposes a method to solve the joint optimization of test node selection and fiber thread connection. The problem is modeled as an integer linear programming problem with two classes of decision variables. The first class of decision variables are composed of the number of parallel fiber threads throughout each potential testing route, the other class of decision variables are imposed just to denote whether a node is decided as a location to place testing equipment. The objective of the joint optimization is to minimize the number of nodes where fiber test equipment based on the optical time domain reflectometer are planned to locate. The objective function is just the sum of the second class of decision variables. Two types of linear constraints are needed. The first type of constraints describes the mutual relation between the two classes of variables, and the other type of constraints are formed to depict the impact of the number of fiber threads mounted within each fiber link on the first class of decision variables. Multiple examples are given to exhibit the advantage of joint optimization over heuristic method.

[1]  Gustavo C. Amaral,et al.  Multiple Fiber Fault Location With Low-Frequency Sub-Carrier Tone Sweep , 2017, IEEE Photonics Technology Letters.

[2]  Pedro Corredera,et al.  Distributed Vibration Sensing Over 125 km With Enhanced SNR Using Phi-OTDR Over a URFL Cavity , 2015, Journal of Lightwave Technology.

[3]  Xian Xiao,et al.  Flex-LIONS: A Silicon Photonic Bandwidth-Reconfigurable Optical Switch Fabric , 2020, IEICE Trans. Commun..

[4]  A. Hartog,et al.  On the theory of backscattering in single-mode optical fibers , 1984 .

[5]  Philippe Chanclou,et al.  Things You Should Know About Fronthaul , 2015, Journal of Lightwave Technology.

[6]  Alexander Schrijver,et al.  Theory of linear and integer programming , 1986, Wiley-Interscience series in discrete mathematics and optimization.

[7]  W. Marsden I and J , 2012 .

[8]  Gustavo C. Amaral,et al.  Fiber Monitoring Using a Sub-Carrier Band in a Sub-Carrier Multiplexed Radio-Over-Fiber Transmission System for Applications in Analog Mobile Fronthaul , 2016, Journal of Lightwave Technology.

[9]  Gustavo C. Amaral,et al.  A Low-Frequency Tone Sweep Method for In-Service Fault Location in Subcarrier Multiplexed Optical Fiber Networks , 2017, Journal of Lightwave Technology.

[10]  Z. N. Wang,et al.  Ultra-long phase-sensitive OTDR with hybrid distributed amplification. , 2014, Optics letters.

[11]  R. Tibshirani Regression Shrinkage and Selection via the Lasso , 1996 .

[12]  E. L. Lawler,et al.  Branch-and-Bound Methods: A Survey , 1966, Oper. Res..

[13]  Jun Zhang,et al.  Photon Counting OTDR: Advantages and Limitations , 2010, Journal of Lightwave Technology.

[14]  Fei Peng,et al.  128km fully-distributed high-sensitivity fiber-optic intrusion sensor with 15m spatial resolution , 2014, OFC 2014.

[15]  Ivana Gasulla,et al.  Field-programmable photonic arrays. , 2018, Optics express.

[16]  José Capmany,et al.  Auto-routing algorithm for field-programmable photonic gate arrays. , 2020, Optics express.

[17]  J Nakayama,et al.  Optical fiber fault locator by the step frequency method. , 1987, Applied optics.

[18]  Scott A. Hamilton,et al.  Optical network switch for dynamically reconfigurable single- and multi-cast topologies , 2017, 2017 Conference on Lasers and Electro-Optics (CLEO).

[19]  M. D. Rourke,et al.  Optical time domain reflectometer. , 1977, Applied optics.