The LAIRAH project : log analysis of digital resources in the arts and humanities. Final report to the Arts and Humanities Research Council.

Digital Humanities is a relatively young but very productive discipline. In its short history scholars have produced thousands of digital resources which have been funded by governments, philanthropic bodies and universities. In the UK alone, over 250 digital humanities projects have been funded by the Arts and Humanities Research Council (AHRC) since 1998. Yet what happens to such resources after completion is poorly understood. Anecdotal evidence suggests that some projects become well known but others have been relatively quickly forgotten. This is regrettable since the non-use of a resource represents a waste both of the considerable intellectual effort and time expended in its production, and potentially considerable amounts of funding. No systematic survey of digital resource usage in the humanities has been undertaken, and the characteristics of a project that might predispose it for sustained use have never been studied. This report presents the results the LAIRAH (Log analysis of Internet Resources in the Arts and Humanities) project (http://www.ucl.ac.uk/slais/research/circah/lairah/) based at UCL’s School of Library Archive and Information Studies: a study to discover what influences the long-term sustainability and use of digital resources in the humanities.

[1]  John S. Gero,et al.  Situated design simulations using curious agents , 2004 .

[2]  George Buchanan,et al.  A library or just another information resource? A case study of users' mental models of traditional and digital libraries , 2007, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[3]  Sanna Talja,et al.  Reasons for the use and non-use of electronic journals and databases: A domain analytic study in four scholarly disciplines , 2003, J. Documentation.

[4]  Stephen E. Wiberley.  Names in Space and Time: The Indexing Vocabulary of the Humanities , 1988, The Library Quarterly.

[5]  WhitmireEthelene.  Disciplinary differences and undergraduates' information-seeking behavior , 2002 .

[6]  Sue Stone,et al.  Humanities scholars: Information Needs and Uses , 1982, J. Documentation.

[7]  Ben Shneiderman,et al.  Designing the User Interface: Strategies for Effective Human-Computer Interaction , 1998 .

[8]  Melissa Terras,et al.  The (In)Visibility of Digital Humanites Resources in Academic Contexts , 2006 .

[9]  Gitte Lindgaard,et al.  Attention web designers: You have 50 milliseconds to make a good first impression! , 2006, Behav. Inf. Technol..

[10]  S. Appelbaum,et al.  Overview and Conclusions , 1977 .

[11]  A. Barrett.  The information-seeking habits of graduate student researchers in the Humanities , 2005 .

[12]  C. Chu.  Literary Critics at Work and their Information Needs: A Research-Phases Model. , 1999 .

[13]  Marcia J. Bates,et al.  The Getty End-User Online Searching Project in the Humanities: Report No. 6: Overview and Conclusions , 1996 .

[14]  Dag Petersson,et al.  Time and Technology , 2005 .

[15]  Chuan Yi Tang,et al.  A 2.|E|-Bit Distributed Algorithm for the Directed Euler Trail Problem , 1993, Inf. Process. Lett..

[16]  C Warwick.  English Literature, electronic text and computer analysis: an unlikely combination? , 1999 .

[17]  Eti Herman.  End‐users in academia: meeting the information needs of university researchers in an electronic age: Part 2 Innovative information‐accessing opportunities and the researcher: user acceptance of IT‐based information resources in academia , 2001 .

[18]  J. Cherry,et al.  Historians’ Use of Archival Sources: Promises and Pitfalls of the Digital Age , 2004 .

[19]  Lesley White,et al.  Switching barriers in business‐to‐business services: a qualitative study , 2006 .

[20]  Paul Albitz,et al.  DNS and BIND , 1994 .

[21]  Claire Warwick.  The lowest canonical denominator: Electronic literary texts, and their publication, collection and preservation , 1999 .

[22]  George Buchanan,et al.  Information Seeking by Humanities Scholars , 2005, ECDL.

[23]  D. Ellis.  Modeling the Information-Seeking Patterns of Academic Researchers: A Grounded Theory Approach , 1993, The Library Quarterly.

[24]  George Buchanan,et al.  User Requirements for Humanities Digital Libraries. , 2006 .

[25]  Stephen E. Wiberley.  Subject Access in the Humanities and the Precision of the Humanist's Vocabulary , 1983, The Library Quarterly.

[26]  Marcia J. Bates,et al.  The cascade of interactions in the digital library interface , 2002, Inf. Process. Manag..

[27]  Ann Blandford,et al.  Digital Libraries in Academia: Challenges and Changes , 2002, ICADL.

[28]  M. Dalton,et al.  Historians and Their Information Sources , 2004 .

[29]  Rebecca Watson-Boone.  The Information Needs and Habits of Humanities Scholars. , 1994 .

[30]  Stephen Lehmann,et al.  Humanists and Electronic Information Services: Acceptance and Resistance. , 1991 .

[31]  Rebecca Green,et al.  Locating Sources in Humanities Scholarship: The Efficacy of following Bibliographic References , 2000, The Library Quarterly.

[32]  Edward A. Fox,et al.  Digital Libraries: People, Knowledge, and Technology , 2002, Lecture Notes in Computer Science.

[33]  David Ellis,et al.  The English literature researcher in the age of the Internet , 2005, J. Inf. Sci..