On the baseline evolution of automobile fuel economy in Europe

Abstract ‘Business as usual’ scenarios in long-term energy forecasts are crucial for scenario-based policy analyses. This article focuses on fuel economy of passenger cars and light trucks, a long-disputed issue with serious implications for worldwide energy use and CO2 emissions. The current status in Europe is explained and future developments are analysed with the aid of historical data of the last three decades from the United States and Europe. As a result of this analysis, fuel economy values are proposed for use as assumptions in baseline energy/transport scenarios in the 15 ‘old’ European Union Member States. Proposed values are given for new gasoline and diesel cars and for the years 2010, 2020 and 2030. The increasing discrepancy between vehicle fuel consumption measured under test conditions and that in the real world is also considered. One main conclusion is that the European Commission's voluntary agreement with the automobile industry should not be assumed to fully achieve its target under baseline conditions, nor should it be regarded as a major stimulus for autonomous vehicle efficiency improvements after 2010. A second conclusion is that three very recent studies enjoying authority across the EU tend to be overly optimistic as regards the technical progress for conventional and alternative vehicle propulsion technologies under ‘business as usual’ conditions.

[1]  F. Baker,et al.  First Session of WMO–UNEP Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), held in Geneva, Switzerland, during 9–11 November 1988 , 1989, Environmental Conservation.

[2]  M. Thring World Energy Outlook , 1977 .

[3]  Lester B. Lave,et al.  Evaluating automobile fuel/propulsion system technologies , 2003 .

[4]  David L. Greene,et al.  Why CAFE worked , 1997 .

[5]  John B. Heywood,et al.  ON THE ROAD IN 2020 - A LIFE-CYCLE ANALYSIS OF NEW AUTOMOBILE TECHNOLOGIES , 2000 .

[6]  David L. Greene,et al.  Energy futures for the US transport sector , 2001 .

[7]  O. Davidson,et al.  Climate change 2001 : mitigation , 2001 .

[8]  Lee Schipper,et al.  New car test and actual fuel economy: yet another gap? , 1994 .

[9]  G. Tichy Over-Optimism Among Experts in Assessment and Foresight , 2002 .

[10]  Peter A. Shulman,et al.  Analysis of US Energy Scenarios , 2003 .

[11]  Vaclav Smil,et al.  Perils of Long-Range Energy Forecasting , 2000 .

[12]  David L. Greene,et al.  Fuel Economy Rebound Effect for U.S. Household Vehicles , 1999, Controlling Automobile Air Pollution.

[13]  Kathleen Segerson,et al.  Voluntary Environmental Agreements: Good or Bad News for Environmental Protection? , 1998 .

[14]  Harold A. Linstone,et al.  Shaping the Next One Hundred Years: New Methods for Quantitative, Long-Term Policy Analysis: R.J. Lempert, S.W. Popper, and S.C. Bankes, Santa Monica, CA, The RAND Corporation, 2003 , 2004 .

[15]  Robert van den Brink,et al.  WHY HAS CAR-FLEET SPECIFIC FUEL CONSUMPTION NOT SHOWN ANY DECREASE SINCE 1990? QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS OF DUTCH PASSENGER CAR-FLEET SPECIFIC FUEL CONSUMPTION , 2001 .

[16]  Peter Walzer,et al.  Future engine technologies for passenger cars , 2003 .

[17]  D. Greene,et al.  Energy efficiency and consumption — the rebound effect — a survey , 2000 .

[18]  R Rijkeboer,et al.  An Outline of the 1994-1998 European Inspection and Maintenance Study: Part I—Design, Tests, and Results of Experimental Methods , 2001, Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association.

[19]  R. Lempert,et al.  Shaping the Next One Hundred Years: New Methods for Quantitative Long-Term Policy Analysis , 2003 .