Analyzing Dangers in Multiagent Rescue Using DEFACTO

Enabling interactions of agent-teams and humans for safe and effective Multiagent rescue is a critical area of research, with encouraging progress in the past few years. However, previous work suffers from three key limitations: (i) limited human situational awareness, reducing human effectiveness in directing agent teams, (ii) the agent team's rigid interaction strategies that jeopardize the rescue operation, and (iii) lack of formal tools to analyze the impact of such interaction strategies. This paper presents a software prototype called DEFACTO (Demonstrating Effective Flexible Agent Coordination of Teams through Omnipresence). DEFACTO is based on a software proxy architecture and 3D visualization system, which addresses the three limitations mentioned above. First, the 3D visualization interface enables human virtual omnipresence in the environment, improving human situational awareness and ability to assist agents. Second, generalizing past work on adjustable autonomy, the agent team chooses among a variety of "team-level" interaction strategies, even excluding humans from the loop in extreme circumstances. Third, analysis tools help predict the dangers of using fixed strategies for various agent teams in a future disaster response simulation scenario.

[1]  Dylan M. Jones,et al.  Navigating Buildings in "Desk-Top" Virtual Environments: Experimental Investigations Using Extended Navigational Experience , 1997 .

[2]  A. Paivio,et al.  Pictures and words in visual search , 1974, Memory & cognition.

[3]  Hiroaki Kitano,et al.  RoboCup Rescue: search and rescue in large-scale disasters as a domain for autonomous agents research , 1999, IEEE SMC'99 Conference Proceedings. 1999 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics (Cat. No.99CH37028).

[4]  Milind Tambe,et al.  Towards Adjustable Autonomy for the Real World , 2002, J. Artif. Intell. Res..

[5]  Chung Hee Hwang,et al.  The TRAINS project: a case study in building a conversational planning agent , 1994, J. Exp. Theor. Artif. Intell..

[6]  Maurice Fadel,et al.  A Predictive Control With Flying Capacitor Balancing of a Multicell Active Power Filter , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics.

[7]  David Kortenkamp,et al.  Adjustable Autonomy for Human-Centered Autonomous Systems on Mars , 1998 .

[8]  Alice M. Mulvehill,et al.  An approach to mixed-initiative management of heterogeneous software agent teams , 1999, Proceedings of the 32nd Annual Hawaii International Conference on Systems Sciences. 1999. HICSS-32. Abstracts and CD-ROM of Full Papers.

[9]  Milind Tambe,et al.  An Automated Teamwork Infrastructure for Heterogeneous Software Agents and Humans , 2003, Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems.

[10]  Terrence Fong,et al.  Multi-robot remote driving with collaborative control , 2003, IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron..

[11]  Randall W. Hill,et al.  Virtual Humans in the Mission Rehearsal Exercise System , 2003, Künstliche Intell..

[12]  Michael A. Goodrich,et al.  Towards predicting robot team performance , 2003, SMC'03 Conference Proceedings. 2003 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics. Conference Theme - System Security and Assurance (Cat. No.03CH37483).

[13]  Eric Horvitz,et al.  Principles of mixed-initiative user interfaces , 1999, CHI '99.

[14]  Suya You,et al.  Urban Site Modeling from LiDAR , 2003, ICCSA.

[15]  Anthony E. Richardson,et al.  Spatial knowledge acquisition from maps and from navigation in real and virtual environments , 1999, Memory & cognition.

[16]  Milind Tambe,et al.  A prototype infrastructure for distributed robot-agent-person teams , 2003, AAMAS '03.