The electronic classroom on fire: why it happens, and how to put out the flames

Research has shown that group support systems can improve the classroom experience. However, some teachers are reluctant to adopt the technology due to student flaming. We define flaming as the launching of vitriolic personal attacks, often anonymously and often with the use of profane or obscene language. The paper posits a theoretical causal model for flaming based on deindividuation and extended cognitive learning theory. It then presents a longitudinal experiment, the results of which support our model of flaming. The paper describes three cases from the field where student flaming occurred in new electronic classroom installations, and discusses five successful strategies from these cases for eliminating flaming without losing the benefits of student anonymity. The paper concludes with implications for researchers and practitioners on how to limit flaming in the electronic classroom.

[1]  Sara Kiesler,et al.  Social psychological aspects of computer-mediated communication , 1984 .

[2]  Jay F. Nunamaker,et al.  Facilitating Group Creativity: Experience with a Group Decision Support System , 1987, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[3]  Eric A. Weiss.  The XXII self-assessment: the ethics of computing , 1990, CACM.

[4]  Bruce A. Reinig,et al.  Managing user perceptions of email privacy , 1995, CACM.

[5]  S. Kiesler,et al.  Group processes in computer-mediated communication☆ , 1986 .

[6]  Bruce Anthony Reinig.  An empirical examination of the use of group support systems in the classroom , 1996 .

[7]  Sheila A. Brandt,et al.  Technology-supported cooperative learning in secondary education , 1996, Proceedings of HICSS-29: 29th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[8]  James Jaccard,et al.  Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences , 1983 .

[9]  L. Festinger,et al.  Some consequences of de-individuation in a group , 1952 .

[10]  Thomas A. Finholt,et al.  Electronic Groups at Work. , 1990 .

[11]  E. Diener.  Deindividuation, self-awareness, and disinhibition. , 1979 .

[12]  P. Zimbardo.  The human choice: Individuation, reason, and order versus deindividuation, impulse, and chaos. , 1969 .

[13]  Jay F. Nunamaker,et al.  An experimental investigation of the effects of group size in an electronic meeting environment , 1990, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern..

[14]  S. Kiesler.  The hidden messages in computer networks , 1986 .

[15]  J. Valacich,et al.  Effects of anonymity and evaluative tone on idea generation in computer-mediated groups , 1990 .

[16]  Maryam Alavi,et al.  Computer-Mediated Collaborative Learning: An Empirical Evaluation , 1994, MIS Q..

[17]  R. W. Rogers,et al.  Effects of deindividuating situational cues and aggressive models on subjective deindividuation and aggression. , 1980, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[18]  M. Warschauer.  Computer-Mediated Collaborative Learning: Theory and Practice. , 1997 .

[19]  Mark A. Fuller,et al.  Improving student processing and assimilation of conceptual information: GSS-supported collaborative learning vs. individual constructive learning , 1996, Proceedings of HICSS-29: 29th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[20]  Jay F. Nunamaker,et al.  Implementing Electronic Meeting Systems at IBM: Lessons Learned and Success Factors , 1990, MIS Q..

[21]  Jay F. Nunamaker,et al.  A Study of Collaborative Group Work With and Without Computer-Based Support , 1990, Inf. Syst. Res..

[22]  Robert O. Briggs,et al.  Learning with GSS: a case study , 1996, Proceedings of HICSS-29: 29th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[23]  Robert O. Briggs,et al.  Exploring the use of EMS in the classroom: two field studies , 1995, Proceedings of the Twenty-Eighth Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[24]  Jay F. Nunamaker,et al.  Information technology for negotiating groups: generating options for mutual gain , 1991 .

[25]  Donald R. Cooper,et al.  Business Research Methods , 1980 .