Dedicated breast CT: geometric design considerations to maximize posterior breast coverage

An Institutional Review Board-approved protocol was used to quantify breast tissue inclusion in 52 women, under conditions simulating both craniocaudal (CC) and mediolateral oblique (MLO) views in mammography, dedicated breast CT in the upright subject position, and dedicated breast CT in the prone subject position. Using skin as a surrogate for the underlying breast tissue, the posterior aspect of the breast that is aligned with the chest-wall edge of the breast support in a screen-film mammography system was marked with the study participants positioned for CC and MLO views. The union of skin marks with the study participants positioned for CC and MLO views was considered to represent chest-wall tissue available for imaging with mammography and served as the reference standard. For breast CT, a prone stereotactic breast biopsy unit and a custom-fabricated barrier were used to simulate conditions during prone and upright breast CT, respectively. For the same breast marked on the mammography system, skin marks were made along the breast periphery that was just anterior to the apertures of the prone biopsy unit and the upright barrier. The differences in skin marks between subject positioning simulating breast CT (prone, upright) and mammography were quantified at six anatomic locations. For each location, at least one study participant had a skin mark from breast CT (prone, upright) posterior to mammography. However for all study participants, there was at least one anatomic location where the skin mark from mammography was posterior to that from breast CT (prone, upright) positioning. The maximum amount by which the skin mark from mammography was posterior to breast CT (prone and upright) over all six locations was quantified for each study participant and pair-wise comparison did not exhibit statistically significant difference between prone and upright breast CT (paired t- test, p = 0.4). Quantitatively, for 95% of the study participants the skin mark from mammography was posterior to breast CT (prone or upright) by at the most 9 mm over all six locations. Based on the study observations, geometric design considerations targeting chest-wall coverage with breast CT equivalent to mammography, wherein part of the x-ray beam images through the swale during breast CT are provided. Assuming subjects can extend their chest in to a swale, the optimal swale-depth required to achieve equivalent coverage with breast CT images as mammograms for 95% of the subjects varies in the range of ~30-50 mm for clinical prototypes and was dependent on the system geometry.

[1]  N. Lanconelli,et al.  Cone-beam breast computed tomography with a displaced flat panel detector array. , 2012, Medical physics.

[2]  Simon R. Cherry,et al.  Initial Characterization of a Dedicated Breast PET/CT Scanner During Human Imaging , 2009, Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[3]  Luigi Rigon,et al.  Breast tomography with synchrotron radiation: preliminary results , 2004, Physics in medicine and biology.

[4]  Srinivasan Vedantham,et al.  Technical note: Skin thickness measurements using high-resolution flat-panel cone-beam dedicated breast CT. , 2013, Medical physics.

[5]  Ioannis Sechopoulos,et al.  Dosimetric characterization of a dedicated breast computed tomography clinical prototype. , 2010, Medical physics.

[6]  Srinivasan Vedantham,et al.  Investigation of optimal kVp settings for CT mammography using a flat-panel imager , 2002, SPIE Medical Imaging.

[7]  John M. Boone,et al.  Development and spatial resolution characterization of a dedicated pulsed x-ray, cone-beam breast CT system , 2013, Medical Imaging.

[8]  Guang-Hong Chen,et al.  How to determine detection performance of a DPC-CT system from a conventional cone beam CT system? , 2013, Medical Imaging.

[9]  P. Shikhaliev,et al.  Photon counting spectral CT versus conventional CT: comparative evaluation for breast imaging application , 2011, Physics in medicine and biology.

[10]  Srinivasan Vedantham,et al.  Scaling-law for the energy dependence of anatomic power spectrum in dedicated breast CT. , 2013, Medical physics.

[11]  John M Boone,et al.  Contrast-enhanced dedicated breast CT: initial clinical experience. , 2010, Radiology.

[12]  C. D'Orsi,et al.  High resolution CT mammography of surgical biopsy specimens. , 1996, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[13]  M. Tornai,et al.  Evaluation of tilted cone-beam CT orbits in the development of a dedicated hybrid mammotomograph , 2009, Physics in medicine and biology.

[14]  J. Boone,et al.  Dedicated breast CT: radiation dose and image quality evaluation. , 2001, Radiology.

[15]  Lingyun Chen,et al.  Visibility of microcalcification in cone beam breast CT: effects of X-ray tube voltage and radiation dose. , 2007, Medical physics.

[16]  Ruola Ning,et al.  Cone-beam CT for breast imaging: Radiation dose, breast coverage, and image quality. , 2010, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[17]  P. V. van Waes,et al.  Computed tomography of breast lesions: comparison with x-ray mammography. , 1983, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[18]  Giovanni Mettivier,et al.  Dedicated scanner for laboratory investigations on cone-beam CT/SPECT imaging of the breast , 2011 .

[19]  Paola Coan,et al.  X-ray phase-contrast imaging: from pre-clinical applications towards clinics , 2013, Physics in medicine and biology.

[20]  A. Lauria,et al.  X-ray cone-beam breast computed tomography: Phantom studies , 2008, 2008 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record.

[21]  Daniel B Kopans,et al.  Basic physics and doubts about relationship between mammographically determined tissue density and breast cancer risk. , 2008, Radiology.

[22]  J. Boone,et al.  Dedicated breast CT: initial clinical experience. , 2008, Radiology.

[23]  T R Nelson,et al.  A comprehensive analysis of DgN(CT) coefficients for pendant-geometry cone-beam breast computed tomography. , 2004, Medical physics.

[24]  J. Boone,et al.  Association between power law coefficients of the anatomical noise power spectrum and lesion detectability in breast imaging modalities. , 2013, Physics in medicine and biology.

[25]  Srinivasan Vedantham,et al.  Dedicated breast CT: radiation dose for circle-plus-line trajectory. , 2012, Medical physics.

[26]  Michaela C. C. Weigel,et al.  High-resolution spiral CT of the breast at very low dose: concept and feasibility considerations , 2011, European Radiology.

[27]  Stephen J Glick,et al.  Normalized glandular dose (DgN) coefficients for flat-panel CT breast imaging. , 2004, Physics in medicine and biology.

[28]  John M Boone,et al.  Experimentally determined spectral optimization for dedicated breast computed tomography. , 2011, Medical physics.

[29]  Srinivasan Vedantham,et al.  Dedicated breast CT: fibroglandular volume measurements in a diagnostic population. , 2012, Medical physics.

[30]  S J Dwyer,et al.  Specific value of computed tomographic breast scanner (CT/M) in diagnosis of breast diseases. , 1979, Radiology.

[31]  R. Edward Hendrick,et al.  Mammography quality control manual , 1999 .

[32]  Kai Yang,et al.  The characterization of breast anatomical metrics using dedicated breast CT. , 2011, Medical physics.

[33]  J E Bowsher,et al.  Performance of dedicated emission mammotomography for various breast shapes and sizes , 2006, Physics in medicine and biology.

[34]  Andrew D. A. Maidment,et al.  Quality control for digital mammography in the ACRIN DMIST trial: part I. , 2006, Medical physics.

[35]  Hengyong Yu,et al.  Cone-beam mammo-computed tomography from data along two tilting arcs. , 2006, Medical physics.