Reduced-order modeling of turbulent reacting flows with application to ramjets and scramjets

DOI: 10.2514/1.50272 A new engine model has been developed for applications requiring run times shorter than a few seconds, such as design optimization or control evaluation. A reduced-order model for mixing and combustion has been developed that is based on nondimensional scaling of turbulent jets in crossflow and tabulated presumed probability distribution function flamelet chemistry. The three-dimensional information from these models is then integrated across cross-sectional planes so that a one-dimensional profile of the reaction rate of each species can be established. Finally, the one-dimensional conservation equations are integrated along the downstream axial direction and the longitudinal evolution of the flow can be computed. The reduced-order model accurately simulates real-gas effects such as dissociation, recombination, and finite rate chemistry for geometries for which the main flow is nearly onedimensional. Thus, this approach may be applied to any flowpath in which this is the case; ramjets, scramjets, and rockets are good candidates. Comparisons to computational fluid dynamics solutions and experimental data were conducted to determine the validity of this approach. I. Introduction T HIS work addresses the need for an improved control-oriented model of a dual-mode ramjet/scramjet propulsion system. Improvements are needed to include more realistic estimates of the losses of the propulsion efficiency due to shock wave interactions in the inlet, as well as due to gas dissociation and incomplete combustion in the combustor section. One problem is that previous lowerorder propulsion models [1–3] do not include the losses due to multiple shock interactions, gas dissociation, and incomplete combustioncausedby finiteratechemistry.Thisisaseriousproblem, because the main advantage of ascramjet engine over a ramjet isthat the scramjet reduces losses due to internal shock waves and gas dissociation [4]. That is, the scramjet eliminates the need for strong internalshockwavestodeceleratethegastosubsonicconditionsand maintains lower static temperatures than a ramjet, which reduces the dissociation losses. The present effort addresses previous shortcomings by including both of these types of losses into a code called MASIV. MASIV consists of several reduced-order models (ROMs). One is an inlet ROM that computes losses due to multiple shock/ expansion wave interactions; this ROM is described elsewhere [5]. The other is a fuel/air mixing/combustion ROM that is the focus of the present paper. MASIV has been incorporated into a larger hypersonic vehicle (HSV) code, which is available without charge and without International Traffic in Arms Regulations restrictions. Sincecomputational fluiddynamics(CFD)codestakemanyhours to reach solutions for reacting flows, they are difficult to apply to problems in which a large number of solutions are required. A tool that can solve these configurations in a short time to acceptable accuracyishighlydesirableforcontrolanddesignapplications,such

[1]  Norbert Peters Die Struktur turbulenter Freistrahl-Diffusionsflammen , 1983 .

[2]  M. Mungal,et al.  Mixing, structure and scaling of the jet in crossflow , 1998, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[3]  N. Peters Laminar diffusion flamelet models in non-premixed turbulent combustion , 1984 .

[4]  William H. Heiser,et al.  Hypersonic Airbreathing Propulsion , 1994 .

[5]  Sanford Gordon,et al.  Computer program for calculation of complex chemical equilibrium compositions , 1972 .

[6]  Jeffrey P. Thomas,et al.  Proper Orthogonal Decomposition Technique for Transonic Unsteady Aerodynamic Flows , 2000 .

[7]  Forman A. Williams,et al.  Descriptions of Nonpremixed Turbulent Combustion , 2006 .

[8]  Y. Hardalupas,et al.  Local measurements of the time-dependent heat release rate and equivalence ratio using chemiluminescent emission from a flame , 2004 .

[9]  Matthew Fotia,et al.  Preliminary Design Methodology for Hypersonic Engine Flowpaths , 2009 .

[10]  David B. Doman,et al.  A Scramjet Engine Model Including Effects of Precombustion Shocks and Dissociation , 2008 .

[11]  Campbell D. Carter,et al.  Raman Scattering Measurements of Gaseous Ethylene Jets in a Mach 2 Supersonic Crossflow , 2010 .

[12]  J. Driscoll,et al.  Combustion characteristics of a dual-mode scramjet combustor with cavity flameholder , 2009 .

[13]  Norbert Peters,et al.  Scalar dissipation rates in turbulent jets and jet diffusion flames , 1989 .

[14]  David B. Doman,et al.  Nonlinear Longitudinal Dynamical Model of an Air-Breathing Hypersonic Vehicle , 2007 .

[15]  Matthias Ihme,et al.  LES flamelet modeling of a three-stream MILD combustor: Analysis of flame sensitivity to scalar inflow conditions , 2011 .

[16]  Matthias Ihme,et al.  Prediction of autoignition in a lifted methane/air flame using an unsteady flamelet/progress variable model , 2010 .

[17]  Michael A. Bolender,et al.  Effects of Improved Propulsion Modelling on the Flight Dynamics of Hypersonic Vehicles , 2008 .

[18]  Sean M. Torrez,et al.  Heat Release Distribution in a Dual-Mode Scramjet Combustor - Measurements and Modeling , 2009 .

[19]  H. Schlichting Boundary Layer Theory , 1955 .

[20]  H. Pitsch,et al.  Modeling of radiation and nitric oxide formation in turbulent nonpremixed flames using a flamelet/progress variable formulation , 2008 .

[21]  Con J. Doolan,et al.  Comparison of Hydrogen and Hydrocarbon-Fueled Scramjet Engines for Orbital Insertion , 2007 .

[22]  A. Shapiro The dynamics and thermodynamics of compressible fluid flow. , 1953 .

[23]  Ernest F. Hasselbrink,et al.  Transverse jets and jet flames. Part 1. Scaling laws for strong transverse jets , 2001, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[24]  Matthew Fotia,et al.  Reduced-Order Modeling of Two-Dimensional Supersonic Flows with Applications to Scramjet Inlets , 2010 .

[25]  Michael A. Bolender,et al.  Hypersonic Vehicle Thrust Sensitivity to Angle of Attack and Mach Number , 2009 .

[26]  Ryan P. Starkey,et al.  Quasi-One-Dimensional High-Speed Engine Model with Finite-Rate Chemistry , 2001 .

[27]  Sean M. Torrez,et al.  Scramjet Engine Model MASIV: Role of Mixing, Chemistry and Wave Interaction , 2009 .

[28]  Christopher Tarpley,et al.  Stability derivatives for a hypersonic caret-wing waverider , 1995 .

[29]  Ernest F. Hasselbrink,et al.  Transverse jets and jet flames. Part 2. Velocity and OH field imaging , 2001, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[30]  F. S. Billig,et al.  Design Techniques for Dual Mode Ram Scramjet Combustors , 1990 .

[31]  David K. Schmidt,et al.  Analytical aeropropulsive-aeroelastic hypersonic-vehicle model with dynamic analysis , 1994 .