VoteLab: A Modular and Adaptive Experimentation Platform for Online Collective Decision Making

Digital democracy and new forms for direct digital participation in policy making gain unprecedented momentum. This is particularly the case for preferential voting methods and decision-support systems designed to promote fairer, more inclusive and legitimate collective decision-making processes in citizens assemblies, participatory budgeting and elections. However, a systematic human experimentation with different voting methods is cumbersome and costly. This paper introduces VoteLab, an open-source and thoroughly-documented platform for modular and adaptive design of voting experiments. It supports to visually and interactively build reusable campaigns with a choice of different voting methods, while voters can easily respond to subscribed voting questions on a smartphone. A proof-of-concept with four voting methods and questions on COVID-19 in an online lab experiment have been used to study the consistency of voting outcomes. It demonstrates the capability of VoteLab to support rigorous experimentation of complex voting scenarios.

[1]  Thomas P. Wellings,et al.  Improving City Life via Legitimate and Participatory Policy-making: A Data-driven Approach in Switzerland , 2023, DG.O.

[2]  Javier Argota Sánchez-Vaquerizo,et al.  Democracy by Design: Perspectives for Digitally Assisted, Participatory Upgrades of Society , 2023, J. Comput. Sci..

[3]  Gerdus Benade,et al.  Participatory Budgeting Design for the Real World , 2023, ArXiv.

[4]  Sachit Mahajan.  Design and development of an open-source framework for citizen-centric environmental monitoring and data analysis , 2022, Scientific Reports.

[5]  Evangelos Pournaras,et al.  Crowd Sensing and Living Lab Outdoor Experimentation Made Easy , 2021, IEEE Pervasive Computing.

[6]  C. Hausladen.  The Impact of Consensus-Orientation on Legitimacy Ratings , 2021, AEA Randomized Controlled Trials.

[7]  Marcus M. Dapp,et al.  Finance 4.0—Towards a Socio-Ecological Finance System a Participatory Framework to Promote Sustainability , 2021 .

[8]  P. Emerson.  Majority Voting as a Catalyst of Populism , 2019 .

[9]  Evangelos Pournaras,et al.  Proof of Witness Presence: Blockchain Consensus for Augmented Democracy in Smart Cities , 2019, J. Parallel Distributed Comput..

[10]  Ali Kassem,et al.  Decentralized Voting Platform Based on Ethereum Blockchain , 2018, 2018 IEEE International Multidisciplinary Conference on Engineering Technology (IMCET).

[11]  Ariel D. Procaccia,et al.  Preference Elicitation For Participatory Budgeting , 2017, AAAI.

[12]  S. Pavithra,et al.  Secure voting system through SMS and using smart phone application , 2017, 2017 International Conference on Algorithms, Methodology, Models and Applications in Emerging Technologies (ICAMMAET).

[13]  E. Posner,et al.  Quadratic Voting as Efficient Corporate Governance , 2013 .

[14]  Andre Charland,et al.  Mobile application development , 2011, Commun. ACM.

[15]  Marco Battaglini,et al.  Efficiency, Equity, and Timing of Voting Mechanisms , 2005, American Political Science Review.

[16]  Benjamin Reilly,et al.  The global spread of preferential voting: Australian institutional imperialism? , 2004 .

[17]  L. A. Goodman,et al.  Social Choice and Individual Values , 1951 .

[18]  K. Gehrkens.  Efficiency , 1935, Industry, Innovation and Infrastructure.

[19]  D. Helbing,et al.  On the Legitimacy of Voting Methods , 2023, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[20]  W. Hager,et al.  and s , 2019, Shallow Water Hydraulics.

[21]  Evangelos Pournaras,et al.  Sensing and Mining Urban Qualities in Smart Cities , 2017, 2017 IEEE 31st International Conference on Advanced Information Networking and Applications (AINA).

[22]  M. Hanumanthappa,et al.  Secure Mobile Based Voting System , 2008 .