Role of dioxygenase α-DOX2 and SA in basal response and in hexanoic acid-induced resistance of tomato (Solanum lycopersicum) plants against Botrytis cinerea.

Resistance of tomato (Solanum Lycopersicum) to the fungal pathogen Botrytis cinerea requires complex interplay between hormonal signalling. In this study, we explored the involvement of new oxylipins in the tomato basal and induced response to this necrotroph through the functional analysis of the tomato α-dioxygenase2 (α-DOX2)-deficient mutant divaricata. We also investigated the role of SA in the defence response against this necrotrophic fungus using SA-deficient tomato nahG plants. The plants lacking dioxigenase α-DOX2, which catalyses oxylipins production from fatty acids, were more susceptible to Botrytis, and hexanoic acid-induced resistance (Hx-IR) was impaired; hence α-DOX2 is required for both tomato defence and the enhanced protection conferred by natural inducer hexanoic acid (Hx) against B. cinerea. The divaricata plants accumulated less pathogen-induced callose and presented lower levels of jasmonic acid (JA) and 12-oxo-phytodienoic acid (OPDA) upon infection if compared to the wild type. Glutathion-S-transferase (GST) gene expression decreased and ROS production significantly increased in Botrytis-infected divaricata plants. These results indicate that absence of α-DOX2 influences the hormonal changes, oxidative burst and callose deposition that occur upon Botrytis infection in tomato. The study of SA-deficient nahG tomato plants showed that the plants with low SA levels displayed increased resistance to Botrytis, but were unable to display Hx-IR. This supports the involvement of SA in Hx-IR. NaghG plants displayed reduced callose and ROS accumulation upon infection and an increased GST expression. This reflects a positive relationship between SA and these defensive mechanisms in tomato. Finally, Hx boosted the pathogen-induced callose in nahG plants, suggesting that this priming mechanism is SA-independent. Our results support the involvement of the oxylipins pathway and SA in tomato response to Botrytis, probably through complex crosstalk of the hormonal balance with callose and ROS accumulation, and reinforce the role of the oxidative stress in the outcome of the plant-Botrytis interaction.

[1]  A. Osbourn.  Preformed Antimicrobial Compounds and Plant Defense against Fungal Attack. , 1996, The Plant cell.

[2]  Murray Grant,et al.  Hormone crosstalk in plant disease and defense: more than just jasmonate-salicylate antagonism. , 2011, Annual review of phytopathology.

[3]  U. Conrath,et al.  Priming for stress resistance: from the lab to the field. , 2007, Current opinion in plant biology.

[4]  H. Yoshioka,et al.  Role of nitric oxide and reactive oxygen species in disease resistance to necrotrophic pathogens , 2010 .

[5]  B. Vicedo,et al.  Hexanoic acid protects tomato plants against Botrytis cinerea by priming defence responses and reducing oxidative stress. , 2014, Molecular plant pathology.

[6]  M. Grant,et al.  Arabidopsis systemic immunity uses conserved defense signaling pathways and is mediated by jasmonates , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[7]  C. Wasternack,et al.  The Outcomes of Concentration-Specific Interactions between Salicylate and Jasmonate Signaling Include Synergy, Antagonism, and Oxidative Stress Leading to Cell Death , 2005, Plant Physiology.

[8]  I. Baldwin,et al.  The two α-dox genes of Nicotiana attenuata: overlapping but distinct functions in development and stress responses , 2010, BMC Plant Biology.

[9]  S. Spoel,et al.  Fine-Tuning Plant Defence Signalling: Salicylate versus Jasmonate. , 2006, Plant biology.

[10]  Jonathan D. G. Jones,et al.  Salicylic acid is not required for Cf-2- and Cf-9-dependent resistance of tomato to Cladosporium fulvum. , 2000, The Plant journal : for cell and molecular biology.

[11]  P. Tudzynski,et al.  Reactive oxygen species in phytopathogenic fungi: signaling, development, and disease. , 2011, Annual review of phytopathology.

[12]  M. Hamberg,et al.  Involvement of the Arabidopsis alpha-DOX1 fatty acid dioxygenase in protection against oxidative stress and cell death. , 2002, The Plant journal : for cell and molecular biology.

[13]  V. Flors,et al.  Priming for JA-dependent defenses using hexanoic acid is an effective mechanism to protect Arabidopsis against B. cinerea. , 2011, Journal of plant physiology.

[14]  B. Hohn,et al.  Descendants of Primed Arabidopsis Plants Exhibit Resistance to Biotic Stress1[W][OA] , 2011, Plant Physiology.

[15]  U. Conrath.  Molecular aspects of defence priming. , 2011, Trends in plant science.

[16]  F. Takken,et al.  Does chromatin remodeling mark systemic acquired resistance? , 2009, Trends in plant science.

[17]  E. A. Biezen,et al.  University of Groningen Identification and isolation of the FEEBLY gene from tomato by transposon tagging , 2005 .

[18]  P. Tudzynski,et al.  Does botrytis cinerea Ignore H(2)O(2)-induced oxidative stress during infection? Characterization of botrytis activator protein 1. , 2009, Molecular plant-microbe interactions : MPMI.

[19]  T. Aung,et al.  Stress-responsive α-dioxygenase expression in tomato roots , 2005 .

[20]  Victor Flors,et al.  Callose deposition: a multifaceted plant defense response. , 2011, Molecular plant-microbe interactions : MPMI.

[21]  A. Levine,et al.  Infection of Arabidopsis with a necrotrophic pathogen, Botrytis cinerea, elicits various defense responses but does not induce systemic acquired resistance (SAR) , 2002, Plant Molecular Biology.

[22]  L. Dolan,et al.  A RhoGDP dissociation inhibitor spatially regulates growth in root hair cells , 2005, Nature.

[23]  V. Flors,et al.  Preventive and post‐infection control of Botrytis cinerea in tomato plants by hexanoic acid , 2008 .

[24]  F. Daayf,et al.  Botrytis cinerea Manipulates the Antagonistic Effects between Immune Pathways to Promote Disease Development in Tomato[C][W][OA] , 2011, Plant Cell.

[25]  R. Bostock.  Signal crosstalk and induced resistance: straddling the line between cost and benefit. , 2005, Annual review of phytopathology.

[26]  J. Glazebrook.  Contrasting mechanisms of defense against biotrophic and necrotrophic pathogens. , 2005, Annual review of phytopathology.

[27]  B. Asselbergh,et al.  Resistance to Botrytis cinerea in sitiens, an Abscisic Acid-Deficient Tomato Mutant, Involves Timely Production of Hydrogen Peroxide and Cell Wall Modifications in the Epidermis1[C][W][OA] , 2007, Plant Physiology.

[28]  A. Bennett,et al.  Absence of the endo-beta-1,4-glucanases Cel1 and Cel2 reduces susceptibility to Botrytis cinerea in tomato. , 2007, The Plant journal : for cell and molecular biology.

[29]  J. V. van Kan,et al.  The Role of Ethylene and Wound Signaling in Resistance of Tomato to Botrytis cinerea 1 , 2002, Plant Physiology.

[30]  F. Goggin,et al.  Expression of α-DIOXYGENASE 1 in tomato and Arabidopsis contributes to plant defenses against aphids. , 2013, Molecular plant-microbe interactions : MPMI.

[31]  M. Hamberg,et al.  Functional Analysis of α-DOX2, an Active α-Dioxygenase Critical for Normal Development in Tomato Plants1[W] , 2009, Plant Physiology.

[32]  M. Hamberg,et al.  Emerging Complexity in Reactive Oxygen Species Production and Signaling during the Response of Plants to Pathogens1 , 2010, Plant Physiology.

[33]  M. Grant,et al.  Functional analysis of endo-1,4-β-glucanases in response to Botrytis cinerea and Pseudomonas syringae reveals their involvement in plant-pathogen interactions. , 2013, Plant biology.

[34]  M. Hamberg,et al.  Role of 9-lipoxygenase and α-dioxygenase oxylipin pathways as modulators of local and systemic defense. , 2012, Molecular plant.

[35]  R. Dixon,et al.  THE OXIDATIVE BURST IN PLANT DISEASE RESISTANCE. , 1997, Annual review of plant physiology and plant molecular biology.

[36]  M. Hamberg,et al.  Oxylipins Produced by the 9-Lipoxygenase Pathway in Arabidopsis Regulate Lateral Root Development and Defense Responses through a Specific Signaling Cascade[W] , 2007, The Plant Cell Online.

[37]  C. Ryan,et al.  Hydrogen peroxide is generated systemically in plant leaves by wounding and systemin via the octadecanoid pathway. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[38]  Frederick M Ausubel,et al.  Arabidopsis local resistance to Botrytis cinerea involves salicylic acid and camalexin and requires EDS4 and PAD2, but not SID2, EDS5 or PAD4. , 2003, The Plant journal : for cell and molecular biology.

[39]  J. Kangasjärvi,et al.  Reactive oxygen species and hormonal control of cell death. , 2003, Trends in plant science.

[40]  Xinnian Dong,et al.  Systemic acquired resistance. , 2003, Annual review of phytopathology.

[41]  Monica Stein,et al.  Loss of a Callose Synthase Results in Salicylic Acid-Dependent Disease Resistance , 2003, Science.