Robustness study of a reversed-phase liquid chromatographic method for the analysis of carboxylic acids in industrial reaction mixtures.

The robustness study of the reversed-phase liquid chromatographic method developed for the quantitative analysis of carboxylic acids is a real asset to prepare method transfer because it provides an indication of its reliability during routine use. Indeed, it was possible to predict the consequences of small variations in operating conditions on the responses. The design of experiments approach was applied to model the effects and interactions of a high number of factors varying simultaneously with a limited number of runs. First we identified the factors which potentially affect the chromatographic responses used for carboxylic acids quantitation: detection wavelength (lambda), column temperature (T), acetonitrile ratio in mobile phase (Me), duration of the plateau before the gradient (L) and gradient slope (S). Then we estimated the order of magnitude of realistic variations to assign factor levels. Finally a central composite design was carried out around the nominal conditions defined during method optimization. The statistical treatment of responses (retention factors, and concentrations) showed that the column temperature, the acetonitrile ratio in the mobile phase, the duration of the plateau before the gradient and the gradient slope were the most influent factors. The building of the robust domain from response-surfaces allowed us to give tolerance limits for the factors (216 nm< lambda <222 nm, 49.3 degrees C < T < 51.4 degrees C, 4.90% < Me < 5.18%, v/v, 4.5 min < L < 5.4 min, 9%< S <11%) for which the performances of the method were maintained.

[1]  Y. Heyden,et al.  Uncertainty assessment from robustness testing applied on an LC assay for R-timolol and other related substances in S-timolol maleate , 2005 .

[2]  M. Hennion,et al.  Development and validation of a reversed-phase liquid chromatography method for the quantitative determination of carboxylic acids in industrial reaction mixtures. , 2005, Journal of chromatography. A.

[3]  Lee Creighton,et al.  JMP Start Statistics , 2000 .

[4]  Johanna Smeyers-Verbeke,et al.  Handbook of Chemometrics and Qualimetrics: Part A , 1997 .

[5]  Massart,et al.  Supersaturated designs for robustness testing , 2000, Analytical chemistry.

[6]  D. Massart,et al.  Validation of an HPLC method on short columns to assay ketoconazole and formaldehyde in shampoo. , 2003, Journal of pharmaceutical and biomedical analysis.

[7]  Age K. Smilde,et al.  Robustness of analytical chemical methods and pharmaceutical technological products. , 1996 .

[8]  J. Vial,et al.  Reversed-phase liquid chromatography column testing: robustness study of the test. , 2004, Journal of chromatography. A.

[9]  Vial,et al.  Taking into account both preparation and injection in high-performance liquid chromatography linearity studies , 2000, Journal of chromatographic science.

[10]  A. Jardy,et al.  Utilisation des plans d'expériences pour évaluer la robustesse d'une méthode d'analyse quantitative par Chromatographie en Phase Liquide , 1998 .

[11]  L. Nagy,et al.  Retention behaviours and separation of carboxylic acids by ion-exchange chromatography. , 1998, Journal of chromatography. B, Biomedical sciences and applications.

[12]  Bieke Dejaegher,et al.  The variance of screening and supersaturated design results as a measure for method robustness , 2005 .

[13]  J. Vial,et al.  Reversed-phase liquid chromatography testing. Role of organic solvent through an extended set of columns. , 2005, Journal of chromatography. A.