Imaging Time After Gd-DTPA Injection Is Critical in Using Delayed Enhancement to Determine Infarct Size Accurately With Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Background—In patients with acute myocardial infarction (MI), delayed enhancement is seen in MRI 5 to 7 minutes after gadolinium–diethylenetriamine pentaacetic acid (Gd-DTPA) injection, and the enhancement occurs in regions that later show recovery of function. However, in a canine model of acute MI, delayed enhancement 20 to 30 minutes after injection only occurs in necrotic regions and not in surrounding, reversibly injured myocardium. The objective of the present study was to determine (1) if the size of the enhanced region varies with time after Gd-DTPA injection and (2) if and when the size of the enhanced region corresponds to the true infarct size. Methods and Results—The left coronary artery was occluded in 15 Lewis rats for 30 minutes (n=9) or 2 hours (n=6); this was followed by reperfusion. MRI scans were performed 48±2 hours after-MI. Midventricular short-axis images were obtained continuously for 40 minutes after Gd-DTPA injection (0.3 mmol/kg). The sizes of enhanced regions at each time were determined by threshold analysis and compared with triphenyltetrazolium chloride–stained sections of the excised rat heart. In all animals, the enhanced region overestimated infarct size (28±5%) immediately after the injection of Gd-DTPA, although it then gradually receded to match the size of the infarct. The time required for enhancement to accurately determine infarct size was significantly different between 2-hour infarcts (16±2 minutes) and 30-minute (26±4 minutes) infarcts (P <0.05). Conclusions—In reperfused acute MI, accurate determination of infarct size by delayed enhancement MRI requires imaging at specific times after Gd-DTPA injection, and this time varies with the duration of occlusion.

[1]  D. Duncker,et al.  Animal models in the study of myocardial ischaemia and ischaemic syndromes. , 1998, Cardiovascular research.

[2]  O. Simonetti,et al.  An improved MR imaging technique for the visualization of myocardial infarction. , 2001, Radiology.

[3]  O. Simonetti,et al.  Relationship of MRI delayed contrast enhancement to irreversible injury, infarct age, and contractile function. , 1999, Circulation.

[4]  G. Chatzimavroudis,et al.  MRI techniques for cardiovascular imaging , 1999, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[5]  S. Kaul,et al.  Myocardial viability on echocardiography predicts long-term survival after revascularization in patients with ischemic congestive heart failure. , 1999, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[6]  O. Simonetti,et al.  The use of contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging to identify reversible myocardial dysfunction. , 2000, The New England journal of medicine.

[7]  R. Kim,et al.  Early Assessment of Myocardial Salvage by Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging , 2000, Circulation.

[8]  C. Kramer,et al.  Early contrast-enhanced MRI predicts late functional recovery after reperfused myocardial infarction. , 1999, Circulation.

[9]  C. Higgins,et al.  Reperfused myocardial infarction as seen with use of necrosis-specific versus standard extracellular MR contrast media in rats. , 1999, Radiology.

[10]  C. Chatfield Probability and statistics in engineering and management science , 1973 .

[11]  C M Kramer,et al.  Contractile reserve and contrast uptake pattern by magnetic resonance imaging and functional recovery after reperfused myocardial infarction. , 2000, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[12]  J. Townend,et al.  Coronary revascularisation for postischaemic heart failure: how myocardial viability affects survival , 1999, Heart.

[13]  E R McVeigh,et al.  Magnitude and time course of microvascular obstruction and tissue injury after acute myocardial infarction. , 1998, Circulation.

[14]  R. Kim,et al.  Contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of myocardium at risk: distinction between reversible and irreversible injury throughout infarct healing. , 2000, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[15]  R. Kim,et al.  Myocardial Gd-DTPA kinetics determine MRI contrast enhancement and reflect the extent and severity of myocardial injury after acute reperfused infarction. , 1996, Circulation.

[16]  R. Peshock,et al.  Gadolinium-DTPA-enhanced nuclear magnetic resonance imaging of reperfused myocardium: identification of the myocardial bed at risk. , 1988, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[17]  George E Taffet,et al.  Myocardial infarction and remodeling in mice: effect of reperfusion. , 1999, American journal of physiology. Heart and circulatory physiology.

[18]  D Hahn,et al.  Analysis of first-pass and delayed contrast-enhancement patterns of dysfunctional myocardium on MR imaging: use in the prediction of myocardial viability. , 2000, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.