Feedforward Coordinate Control of a Robotic Cell Injection Catheter

Remote and robotically actuated catheters are the stepping-stones toward autonomous catheters, where complex intravascular procedures may be performed with minimal intervention from a physician. This article proposes a concept for the positional, feedforward control of a robotically actuated cell injection catheter used for the injection of myogenic or undifferentiated stem cells into the myocardial infarct boundary zones of the left ventricle. The prototype for the catheter system was built upon a needle-based catheter with a single degree of deflection, a 3-D printed handle combined with actuators, and the Arduino microcontroller platform. A bench setup was used to mimic a left ventricle catheter procedure starting from the femoral artery. Using Matlab and the open-source video modeling tool Tracker, the planar coordinates (y, z) of the catheter position were analyzed, and a feedforward control system was developed based on empirical models. Using the Student’s t test with a sample size of 26, it was determined that for both the y- and z-axes, the mean discrepancy between the calibrated and theoretical coordinate values had no significant difference compared to the hypothetical value of µ = 0. The root mean square error of the calibrated coordinates also showed an 88% improvement in the z-axis and 31% improvement in the y-axis compared to the unmodified trial run. This proof of concept investigation leads to the possibility of further developing a feedfoward control system in vivo using catheters with omnidirectional deflection. Feedforward positional control allows for more flexibility in the design of an automated catheter system where problems such as systemic time delay may be a hindrance in instances requiring an immediate reaction.

[1]  Ziad F. Issa,et al.  Chapter 6 – Advanced Mapping and Navigation Modalities , 2012 .

[2]  Juan F Granada,et al.  Safety and feasibility of robotic percutaneous coronary intervention: PRECISE (Percutaneous Robotically-Enhanced Coronary Intervention) Study. , 2013, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[3]  Sze-Piaw Chin,et al.  Delivery of Biologics for Angiogenesis and Myogenesis , 2009 .

[4]  Leah Muller,et al.  Remote control catheter navigation: options for guidance under MRI , 2012, Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance.

[5]  E. Sim,et al.  Myoblast Genome Therapy and the Regenerative Heart , 2003 .

[6]  Magnetic and robotic catheter navigation , 2015 .

[7]  Douglas P. Zipes,et al.  Clinical Arrhythmology and Electrophysiology: A Companion to Braunwald's Heart Disease , 2012 .

[8]  E. Gerstenfeld Contact force-sensing catheters: evolution or revolution in catheter ablation technology? , 2014, Circulation. Arrhythmia and electrophysiology.

[9]  Yili Fu,et al.  Steerable catheters in minimally invasive vascular surgery , 2009, The international journal of medical robotics + computer assisted surgery : MRCAS.

[10]  Nicholas S. Peters,et al.  Experience of robotic catheter ablation in humans using a novel remotely steerable catheter sheath , 2008, Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology.

[11]  P. Fitzgerald,et al.  Intracardiac echocardiography during radiofrequency catheter ablation of cardiac arrhythmias in humans. , 1994, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[12]  J. Petrů,et al.  Robot-assisted navigation in atrial fibrillation ablation—Of any benefits? , 2012 .

[13]  Nicolas Derval,et al.  Non Invasive ECG Mapping To Guide Catheter Ablation. , 2014, Journal of atrial fibrillation.

[14]  Robert D. Howe,et al.  Position Control of Motion Compensation Cardiac Catheters , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Robotics.

[15]  Kurt S. Hoffmayer,et al.  Contact force-sensing catheters , 2015, Current opinion in cardiology.

[16]  Jürgen Biermann,et al.  Intracardiac Echocardiography during Catheter-Based Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation , 2012, Cardiology research and practice.

[17]  F. Fernández‐Avilés,et al.  Comparison of the safety and feasibility of arrhythmia ablation using the Amigo Robotic Remote Catheter System versus manual ablation. , 2014, The American journal of cardiology.

[18]  J. Ruskin,et al.  Pulmonary vein isolation for atrial fibrillation. , 2002, Reviews in cardiovascular medicine.

[19]  Paul A Friedman,et al.  Novel mapping techniques for cardiac electrophysiology , 2002, Heart.

[20]  Shuxiang Guo,et al.  Evaluating performance of a novel developed robotic catheter manipulating system , 2013 .

[21]  William A. Phillips,et al.  Myoblast transfer as a platform technology of gene therapy , 1998 .

[22]  V. Santinelli,et al.  Robotic magnetic navigation for atrial fibrillation ablation. , 2006, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[23]  Neville Dastur,et al.  Use of a remotely steerable "robotic" catheter in a branched endovascular aortic graft. , 2012, Journal of vascular surgery.

[24]  G. Weisz,et al.  Robotic-Assisted Coronary Intervention , 2014 .

[25]  K. Rhode,et al.  Real-time x-ray fluoroscopy-based catheter detection and tracking for cardiac electrophysiology interventions. , 2013, Medical physics.

[26]  Weyland Cheng,et al.  Conceptual Design and Procedure for an Autonomous Intramyocardial Injection Catheter , 2017, Cell transplantation.

[27]  Mark D. Huffman,et al.  Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics—2016 Update: A Report From the American Heart Association , 2016, Circulation.

[28]  M. Leon,et al.  First-in-human evaluation of a novel robotic-assisted coronary angioplasty system. , 2011, JACC. Cardiovascular interventions.