Welcome to Wonderland: The Influence of the Size and Shape of a Virtual Hand On the Perceived Size and Shape of Virtual Objects

The notion of body-based scaling suggests that our body and its action capabilities are used to scale the spatial layout of the environment. Here we present four studies supporting this perspective by showing that the hand acts as a metric which individuals use to scale the apparent sizes of objects in the environment. However to test this, one must be able to manipulate the size and/or dimensions of the perceiver’s hand which is difficult in the real world due to impliability of hand dimensions. To overcome this limitation, we used virtual reality to manipulate dimensions of participants’ fully-tracked, virtual hands to investigate its influence on the perceived size and shape of virtual objects. In a series of experiments, using several measures, we show that individuals’ estimations of the sizes of virtual objects differ depending on the size of their virtual hand in the direction consistent with the body-based scaling hypothesis. Additionally, we found that these effects were specific to participants’ virtual hands rather than another avatar’s hands or a salient familiar-sized object. While these studies provide support for a body-based approach to the scaling of the spatial layout, they also demonstrate the influence of virtual bodies on perception of virtual environments.

[1]  M. Slater,et al.  Multisensory Stimulation Can Induce an Illusion of Larger Belly Size in Immersive Virtual Reality , 2011, PloS one.

[2]  D. Proffitt,et al.  Action-specific influences on distance perception: a role for motor simulation. , 2008, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[3]  D R Proffitt,et al.  Mapping the Zone of Eye-Height Utility for Seated and Standing Observers , 2000, Perception.

[4]  Jeanine K. Stefanucci,et al.  The effects of handedness and reachability on perceived distance. , 2009, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[5]  W. Davis The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception , 2012 .

[6]  Maria V. Sanchez-Vives,et al.  Extending Body Space in Immersive Virtual Reality: A Very Long Arm Illusion , 2012, PloS one.

[7]  Z. Pylyshyn Is vision continuous with cognition? The case for cognitive impenetrability of visual perception. , 1999, The Behavioral and brain sciences.

[8]  M. Jeannerod Neural Simulation of Action: A Unifying Mechanism for Motor Cognition , 2001, NeuroImage.

[9]  M. Wraga Using eye height in different postures to scale the heights of objects. , 1999, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[10]  Jack M. Loomis,et al.  Does Energy Expenditure Affect the Perception of Egocentric Distance? A Failure to Replicate Experiment 1 of Proffitt, Stefanucci, Banton, and Epstein (2003) , 2006, The Spanish Journal of Psychology.

[11]  Maria V. Sanchez-Vives,et al.  First Person Experience of Body Transfer in Virtual Reality , 2010, PloS one.

[12]  Jack M. Loomis,et al.  Measuring Spatial Perception with Spatial Updating and Action , 2008 .

[13]  D R Proffitt,et al.  Seeing Big Things: Overestimation of Heights is Greater for Real Objects Than for Objects in Pictures , 1999, Perception.

[14]  Jeanine K. Stefanucci,et al.  Big People, Little World: The Body Influences Size Perception , 2009, Perception.

[15]  W. Epstein,et al.  Tool use affects perceived distance, but only when you intend to use it. , 2005, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[16]  J. Gibson The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception , 1979 .

[17]  Wolfgang Prinz,et al.  Action science: Foundations of an emerging discipline , 2013 .

[18]  Uwe Kloos,et al.  Egocentric distance judgments in a large screen display immersive virtual environment , 2010, APGV '10.

[19]  Jack M Loomis,et al.  Does energy expenditure affect the perception of egocentric distance? A failure to replicate experiment 1 of Proffitt, Stefanucci, Banton, and Epstein (2003). , 2010, The Spanish journal of psychology.

[20]  L. Carroll,et al.  Alice's Adventures in Wonderland: Princeton University Press , 2015 .

[21]  H. Henrik Ehrsson,et al.  Human Neuroscience , 2022 .

[22]  Maria V. Sanchez-Vives,et al.  Virtual Hand Illusion Induced by Visuomotor Correlations , 2010, PloS one.

[23]  Sally A. Linkenauger,et al.  Taking a hands-on approach: apparent grasping ability scales the perception of object size. , 2011, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[24]  H. Henrik Ehrsson,et al.  Being Barbie: The Size of One’s Own Body Determines the Perceived Size of the World , 2011, PloS one.

[25]  Maria V. Sanchez-Vives,et al.  Inducing Illusory Ownership of a Virtual Body , 2009, Front. Neurosci..

[26]  Verónica C. Ramenzoni,et al.  Illusory Shrinkage and Growth , 2010, Psychological science.

[27]  Jodie A. Baird,et al.  Who is being deceived? The experimental demands of wearing a backpack , 2009, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[28]  W. Epstein The known-size-apparent-distance hypothesis. , 1961, The American journal of psychology.

[29]  J. Witt Tool use influences perceived shape and perceived parallelism, which serve as indirect measures of perceived distance. , 2011, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[30]  T OBONAI,et al.  Induction effects in estimates of extent. , 1954, Journal of experimental psychology.

[31]  M. Masson,et al.  Using confidence intervals in within-subject designs , 1994, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[32]  Uwe Kloos,et al.  The influence of eye height and avatars on egocentric distance estimates in immersive virtual environments , 2011, APGV '11.

[33]  H. Barlow Vision: A computational investigation into the human representation and processing of visual information: David Marr. San Francisco: W. H. Freeman, 1982. pp. xvi + 397 , 1983 .

[34]  Jonathan R. Zadra,et al.  Direct Evidence for the Economy of Action: Glucose and the Perception of Geographical Slant , 2010, Perception.

[35]  Massimiliano Di Luca New Method to Measure End-to-End Delay of Virtual Reality , 2010, PRESENCE: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments.

[36]  Donald D Hoffman,et al.  Natural selection and veridical perceptions. , 2010, Journal of theoretical biology.

[37]  J. Philbeck,et al.  Comparison of two indicators of perceived egocentric distance under full-cue and reduced-cue conditions. , 1997, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[38]  Sally A. Linkenauger,et al.  Look before You Leap: Jumping Ability Affects Distance Perception , 2009, Perception.

[39]  Jeanine K. Stefanucci,et al.  Asymmetrical Body Perception , 2009, Psychological science.