Comparison of alternative techniques for evaluating the marginal outage costs of generating systems

Quantitative evaluation of the marginal outage costs associated with generating systems involves, among other things, the construction of a model of the system capacity outages. This model is inherently discrete and application of the well-known and basic recursive technique requires lengthy computations when applied to large power systems. Alternatively, continuous distributions and fast Fourier transforms can be used to approximate the generating system capacity model. These techniques can in some cases introduce inaccuracies in the results, which depend on the system under consideration. Several authors have used these approximate techniques in the calculation of capacity outage probabilities, the study of parameter uncertainty in generating capacity reliability evaluation, the calculation of the expected energy production costs and the maintenance scheduling of generating facilities. This paper discusses the potential application of the approximate techniques in the evaluation of the marginal outage costs of a power system. The results of the approximate techniques are illustrated by comparison with those produced by the exact recursive technique for the IEEE-Reliability Test System. >

[1]  J. Stremel,et al.  Production Costing Using the Cumulant Method of Representing the Equivalent Load Curve , 1980, IEEE Transactions on Power Apparatus and Systems.

[2]  Roy Billinton,et al.  An Approximate and Practical Approach to Including Uncertainty Concepts in Generating Capacity Reliability Evaluation , 1981 .

[3]  Edward Kahn,et al.  Accuracy of the Edgeworth Approximation for Lolp Calculations in Small Power Systems , 1982, IEEE Transactions on Power Apparatus and Systems.

[4]  D. Gaver,et al.  A Comparison of Algorithms for Computing Power Generating System Reliability Indices , 1984, IEEE Transactions on Power Apparatus and Systems.

[5]  Roy Billinton,et al.  Generating Unit Maintenance Scheduling for Single and Two Interconnected Systems , 1984, IEEE Power Engineering Review.

[6]  Arun P. Sanghvi,et al.  Flexible Strategies for Load/Demand Management Using Dynamic Pricing , 1989, IEEE Power Engineering Review.

[7]  R. Billinton,et al.  Comparison of Two Alternate Methods to Establish an Interrupted Energy Assessment Rate , 1987, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[8]  E. V. Garcia,et al.  The Utility Perspective of Spot Pricing , 1985, IEEE Power Engineering Review.

[9]  Probability Subcommittee,et al.  IEEE Reliability Test System , 1979, IEEE Transactions on Power Apparatus and Systems.

[10]  Roy Billinton,et al.  Reliability evaluation of power systems , 1984 .

[11]  O. Bunke Feller, F.: An Introduction to Probability Theory and its Applications, Vol. II, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York‐London‐Sydney, 1966. XVIII + 626 S., 3 Abb., 2 Tab., Preis $ 12,00 , 1969 .

[12]  R. Burchett,et al.  Discrete Convolution in Power System Reliability , 1981, IEEE Transactions on Reliability.

[13]  Roy Billinton,et al.  Evaluation of interrupted energy assessment rates in composite systems , 1990 .

[14]  F. Schweppe Spot Pricing of Electricity , 1988 .

[15]  Donald P. Gaver,et al.  On the Computation of Power-Generating System Reliability Indexes , 1984 .