Improved hidden Markov models for molecular motors, part 2: extensions and application to experimental data.

Unbiased interpretation of noisy single molecular motor recordings remains a challenging task. To address this issue, we have developed robust algorithms based on hidden Markov models (HMMs) of motor proteins. The basic algorithm, called variable-stepsize HMM (VS-HMM), was introduced in the previous article. It improves on currently available Markov-model based techniques by allowing for arbitrary distributions of step sizes, and shows excellent convergence properties for the characterization of staircase motor timecourses in the presence of large measurement noise. In this article, we extend the VS-HMM framework for better performance with experimental data. The extended algorithm, variable-stepsize integrating-detector HMM (VSI-HMM) better models the data-acquisition process, and accounts for random baseline drifts. Further, as an extension, maximum a posteriori estimation is provided. When used as a blind step detector, the VSI-HMM outperforms conventional step detectors. The fidelity of the VSI-HMM is tested with simulations and is applied to in vitro myosin V data where a small 10 nm population of steps is identified. It is also applied to an in vivo recording of melanosome motion, where strong evidence is found for repeated, bidirectional steps smaller than 8 nm in size, implying that multiple motors simultaneously carry the cargo.

[1]  Frederick Sachs,et al.  Maximum likelihood estimation of molecular motor kinetics from staircase dwell-time sequences. , 2006, Biophysical journal.

[2]  Paul R Selvin,et al.  Fluorescence imaging with one nanometer accuracy: application to molecular motors. , 2005, Accounts of chemical research.

[3]  Michael Vershinin,et al.  A comparison of step-detection methods: how well can you do? , 2008, Biophysical journal.

[4]  R. Cross,et al.  Mechanics of the kinesin step , 2005, Nature.

[5]  D. Gillespie Exact Stochastic Simulation of Coupled Chemical Reactions , 1977 .

[6]  Fiona E Müllner,et al.  Improved hidden Markov models for molecular motors, part 1: basic theory. , 2010, Biophysical journal.

[7]  Samara L. Reck-Peterson,et al.  Single-Molecule Analysis of Dynein Processivity and Stepping Behavior , 2006, Cell.

[8]  Mark J. Schnitzer,et al.  Kinesin hydrolyses one ATP per 8-nm step , 1997, Nature.

[9]  A. Mehta,et al.  Myosin-V stepping kinetics: a molecular model for processivity. , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[10]  S. Gross,et al.  Cargo Transport: Two Motors Are Sometimes Better Than One , 2007, Current Biology.

[11]  P. Selvin,et al.  Adaptability of myosin V studied by simultaneous detection of position and orientation , 2006, The EMBO journal.

[12]  Frederick Sachs,et al.  Extracting dwell time sequences from processive molecular motor data. , 2006, Biophysical journal.

[13]  F J Sigworth,et al.  Applying hidden Markov models to the analysis of single ion channel activity. , 2002, Biophysical journal.

[14]  G. Holzwarth,et al.  Fast vesicle transport in PC12 neurites: velocities and forces , 2004, European Biophysics Journal.

[15]  Xiaolin Nan,et al.  Observation of individual microtubule motor steps in living cells with endocytosed quantum dots. , 2005, The journal of physical chemistry. B.

[16]  Paul R. Selvin,et al.  Tracking melanosomes inside a cell to study molecular motors and their interaction , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[17]  Paul R. Selvin,et al.  Kinesin and Dynein Move a Peroxisome in Vivo: A Tug-of-War or Coordinated Movement? , 2005, Science.

[18]  Liedewij Laan,et al.  Assembly dynamics of microtubules at molecular resolution , 2006, Nature.

[19]  Jonathon Howard,et al.  Detection of fractional steps in cargo movement by the collective operation of kinesin-1 motors , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.