Ki‐67 proliferative index predicts clinical outcome in patients with atypical or anaplastic meningioma

Meningiomas represent the second most common central nervous system neoplasms in adults and account for 26% of all primary brain tumors. Although most are benign, between 5% and 15% of meningiomas are atypical (grade II) whereas 1–2% are anaplastic meningiomas (grade III). Although histological grade is the most relevant prognostic factor, there are some unusual cases in which establishing a diagnosis of high‐grade meningioma following 2000 World Health Organization (WHO) histological criteria is extremely difficult. Therefore, the aim of the present study was to evaluate the predictive value of Ki‐67 labeling index and its contribution to current WHO classification in predicting tumor recurrence and overall survival in patients with high‐grade meningiomas. A total of 28 patients (with 16 atypical meningiomas and 12 anaplastic meningiomas) were evaluated for demographic, clinical, radiological and therapeutic variables, and for Ki‐67 immunohistochemistry. Median Ki‐67 labeling index in the whole series was 7.0 (0.5–31.5) with no differences with respect to the histological grade (P = 0.87). In the univariate analysis, Ki‐67 labeling index and postoperative Karnofsky performance status were identified as significant prognostic factors of tumor recurrence and overall survival. The multivariate analysis demonstrated that Ki‐67 labeling index is the only independent predictor of both tumor recurrence and overall survival. More importantly, this predictive value was maintained in both patients with atypical and patients with anaplastic meningioma.

[1]  B. Scheithauer,et al.  "Malignancy" in meningiomas: a clinicopathologic study of 116 patients, with grading implications. , 1999, Cancer.

[2]  B. Scheithauer,et al.  Meningioma grading: an analysis of histologic parameters. , 1997, The American journal of surgical pathology.

[3]  M. Samii,et al.  The Ki-67 proliferation antigen in meningiomas. Experience in 600 cases , 2004, Acta Neurochirurgica.

[4]  J M Buatti,et al.  Benign meningiomas: primary treatment selection affects survival. , 1997, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[5]  E R Laws,et al.  Factors associated with survival in patients with meningioma. , 1997, Journal of neurosurgery.

[6]  A. Mahmood,et al.  Atypical and Malignant Meningiomas , 1993 .

[7]  I. Whittle,et al.  The accuracy of meningioma grading: a 10‐year retrospective audit , 2005, Neuropathology and applied neurobiology.

[8]  J. Acebes,et al.  Prognostic implication of clinical, radiologic, and pathologic features in patients with anaplastic gliomas , 2003, Cancer.

[9]  F. Kayaselçuk,et al.  The Expression of Survivin and Ki-67 in Meningiomas: Correlation with Grade and Clinical Outcome , 2004, Journal of Neuro-Oncology.

[10]  M. Khan,et al.  The recurrence of intracranial meningiomas after surgical treatment. , 1983, Journal of neurosurgery.

[11]  G. Reifenberger,et al.  The WHO Classification of Tumors of the Nervous System , 2002, Journal of neuropathology and experimental neurology.

[12]  R. Prayson,et al.  MIB-1 labeling indices in benign, aggressive, and malignant meningiomas: a study of 90 tumors. , 1998, Human pathology.

[13]  E. Berg,et al.  World Health Organization Classification of Tumours , 2002 .

[14]  Y. Takeshima,et al.  Immunohistochemical study of Ki-67 (MIB-1), p53 protein, p21WAF1, and p27KIP1 expression in benign, atypical, and anaplastic meningiomas. , 2001, Human pathology.

[15]  A. Mahmood,et al.  Atypical and malignant meningiomas: a clinicopathological review. , 1993 .

[16]  B. Scheithauer,et al.  The prognostic significance of MIB‐1, p53, and DNA flow cytometry in completely resected primary meningiomas , 1998, Cancer.

[17]  N. Hashimoto,et al.  The combination of mitotic and Ki-67 indices as a useful method for predicting short-term recurrence of meningiomas. , 2004, Surgical neurology.

[18]  G. Malik,et al.  Intracranial meningiomas: Analysis of recurrence after surgical treatment , 2005, Acta Neurochirurgica.

[19]  A. Asai,et al.  Postoperative residual tumor growth of meningioma can be predicted by MIB‐1 immunohistochemistry , 1999, Cancer.

[20]  L. Palma,et al.  Long-term prognosis for atypical and malignant meningiomas: a study of 71 surgical cases. , 1997, Journal of neurosurgery.

[21]  M. Møller,et al.  No prediction of recurrence of meningiomas by PCNA and Ki-67 immunohistochemistry , 1997, Journal of Neuro-Oncology.