Computationally efficient wavefront reconstructor for simulation of multiconjugate adaptive optics on giant telescopes

Multi-conjugate adaptive optical (MCAO) systems with from 10,000 to 100,000 degrees of freedom have been proposed for future giant telescopes. Using standard matrix methods to compute, optimize, and implement wavefront reconstruction algorithms for these systems is impractical, since the number of calculations required to compute (apply) the reconstruction matrix scales as the cube (square) of the number of AO degrees of freedom. Significant improvements in computational efficiency are possible by exploiting the sparse and/or periodic structure of the deformable mirror influence matrices and the atmospheric turbulence covariance matrices appearing in these calculations. In this paper, we review recent progress in developing an iterative sparse matrix implementation of minimum variance wavefront reconstruction for MCAO. The basic method is preconditioned conjugate gradients, using a multigrid preconditioner incorporating a layer-oriented, iterative smoothing operator. We outline the key elements of this approach, including special considerations for laser guide star (LGS) MCAO systems with tilt-removed LGS wavefront measurements and auxiliary full aperture tip/tilt measurements from natural guide stars. Performance predictions for sample natural guide star (NGS) and LGS MCAO systems on 8 and 16 meter class telescopes are also presented.

[1]  B. Ellerbroek First-order performance evaluation of adaptive optics systems for atmospheric turbulence compensatio , 1994 .

[2]  Curtis R Vogel,et al.  Multigrid preconditioned conjugate-gradient method for large-scale wave-front reconstruction. , 2002, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[3]  Brent L. Ellerbroek,et al.  Wave optics propagation code for multiconjugate adaptive optics , 2002, SPIE Optics + Photonics.

[4]  E. P. Wallner Optimal wave-front correction using slope measurements , 1983 .

[5]  Byron M. Welsh,et al.  Analysis of Multiconjugate Adaptive Optics , 1992, Adaptive Optics for Large Telescopes.

[6]  Roberto Ragazzoni,et al.  Adaptive optics for 100-m-class telescopes: new challenges require new solutions , 2000, Astronomical Telescopes and Instrumentation.

[7]  L Poyneer,et al.  Fast Wavefront Reconstruction in Large Adaptive Optics Systems Using the Fourier Transform , 2002 .

[8]  Luc Gilles,et al.  Layer-oriented multigrid wavefront reconstruction algorithms for multiconjugate adaptive optics , 2003, SPIE Astronomical Telescopes + Instrumentation.

[9]  Wai-Mee Ching,et al.  Sparse matrix technology tools in APL , 1990 .

[10]  L M Mugnier,et al.  Optimal wave-front reconstruction strategies for multiconjugate adaptive optics. , 2001, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[11]  Brent L Ellerbroek,et al.  Efficient computation of minimum-variance wave-front reconstructors with sparse matrix techniques. , 2002, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.