River rehabilitation for the delivery of multiple ecosystem services at the river network scale.

This paper presents a conceptual framework and methodology to assist with optimising the outcomes of river rehabilitation in terms of delivery of multiple ecosystem services and the benefits they represent for humans at the river network scale. The approach is applicable globally, but was initially devised in the context of a project critically examining opportunities and constraints on delivery of river rehabilitation in Scotland. The spatial-temporal approach highlighted is river rehabilitation measure, rehabilitation scale, location on the stream network, ecosystem service and timescale specific and could be used as initial scoping in the process of planning rehabilitation at the river network scale. The levels of service delivered are based on an expert-derived scoring system based on understanding how the rehabilitation measure assists in reinstating important geomorphological, hydrological and ecological processes and hence intermediate or primary ecosystem function. The framework permits a "total long-term (>25 years) ecosystem service score" to be calculated which is the cumulative result of the combined effect of the number of and level of ecosystem services delivered over time. Trajectories over time for attaining the long-term ecosystem service score for each river rehabilitation measures are also given. Scores could also be weighted according to societal values and economic valuation. These scores could assist decision making in relation to river rehabilitation at the catchment scale in terms of directing resources towards alternative scenarios. A case study is presented of applying the methodology to the Eddleston Water in Scotland using proposed river rehabilitation options for the catchment to demonstrate the value of the approach. Our overall assertion is that unless sound conceptual frameworks are developed that permit the river network scale ecosystem services of river rehabilitation to be evaluated as part of the process of river basin planning and management, the total benefit of river rehabilitation may well be reduced. River rehabilitation together with a 'vision' and framework within which it can be developed, is fundamental to future success in river basin management.

[1]  G. Katul,et al.  Soil moisture and vegetation controls on evapotranspiration in a heterogeneous Mediterranean ecosystem on Sardinia, Italy , 2006 .

[2]  Lisa A. Wainger,et al.  Can the concept of ecosystem services be practically applied to improve natural resource management decisions , 2010 .

[3]  R. Norgaard.  Ecosystem services: From eye-opening metaphor to complexity blinder , 2010 .

[4]  R. O'Neill,et al.  The value of the world's ecosystem services and natural capital , 1997, Nature.

[5]  Katie A. Barnas,et al.  Synthesizing U.S. River Restoration Efforts , 2005, Science.

[6]  P. Warren,et al.  A framework for assessing ecological quality based on ecosystem services , 2010 .

[7]  D. Gilvear.  Patterns of channel adjustment to impoundment of the upper River Spey, Scotland (1942–2000) , 2004 .

[8]  M. Bonell,et al.  Integrated catchment management: from rhetoric to reality in a Scottish HELP basin , 2010 .

[9]  G. Kondolf,et al.  Assessing Salmonid Spawning Gravel Quality , 2000 .

[10]  B. Cook,et al.  Ecosystem services and integrated water resource management: different paths to the same end? , 2012, Journal of environmental management.

[11]  Geoffrey E. Petts,et al.  Long-term Consequences of Upstream Impoundment , 1980, Environmental Conservation.

[12]  Gretchen C Daily,et al.  Conservation Planning for Ecosystem Services , 2006, PLoS biology.

[13]  S. Levin,et al.  Towards a theoretical basis for ecosystem conservation , 2001, Ecological Research.

[14]  J. Meyer,et al.  Restoring Rivers One Reach at a Time: Results from a Survey of U.S. River Restoration Practitioners , 2007 .

[15]  F. Hauer,et al.  The shifting habitat mosaic of river ecosystems , 2005 .

[16]  S. Ormerod.  A golden age of river restoration science , 2004 .

[17]  D. Gilvear,et al.  Trends and issues in delivery of integrated catchment scale river restoration: Lessons learned from a national river restoration survey within Scotland , 2012 .

[18]  S. Hamilton.  Biogeochemical time lags may delay responses of streams to ecological restoration , 2012 .

[19]  G. Pess,et al.  A Review of Stream Restoration Techniques and a Hierarchical Strategy for Prioritizing Restoration in Pacific Northwest Watersheds , 2002 .

[20]  J. Farley,et al.  The economics of valuing ecosystem services and biodiversity , 2010 .

[21]  Tim Hess,et al.  A framework for the assessment of ecosystem goods and services; a case study on lowland floodplains in England , 2010 .

[22]  Guillermo R. Giannico,et al.  Setting River Restoration Priorities: A Review of Approaches and a General Protocol for Identifying and Prioritizing Actions , 2008 .

[23]  Alice Holt Lodge,et al.  ASSESSING THE POTENTIAL OF WOODLAND SERVICES FOR MEETING WATER FRAMEWORK DIRECTIVE OBJECTIVES , 2012 .

[24]  A. Buijs,et al.  Public support for river restoration. A mixed-method study into local residents' support for and framing of river management and ecological restoration in the Dutch floodplains. , 2009, Journal of environmental management.

[25]  S. Arthur,et al.  Natural Flood Management (NFM) Knowledge System: Part 2 - The Effect of NFM Features on the Desynchronising of Flood Peaks at a Catchment Scale , 2012 .

[26]  B. Bryan,et al.  Quantifying and Exploring Strategic Regional Priorities for Managing Natural Capital and Ecosystem Services Given Multiple Stakeholder Perspectives , 2010, Ecosystems.

[27]  A. Arthington,et al.  Flow restoration and protection in Australian rivers , 2003 .

[28]  A. Troy,et al.  Valuing ecosystem services , 2010, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[29]  G. Brierley,et al.  A critical review of catchment-scale stream rehabilitation programmes , 2005 .

[30]  M. Palmer,et al.  Hydroecology and river restoration: Ripe for research and synthesis , 2006 .

[31]  B. C. Patten,et al.  Effects of Watershed Perturbation on Stream Potassium and Calcium Dynamics , 1979 .

[32]  Geoffrey E. Petts,et al.  Impounded Rivers: Perspectives for Ecological Management , 1984 .

[33]  U. Pascual,et al.  Exploring the links between equity and efficiency in payments for environmental services: A conceptual approach , 2010 .

[34]  S. Dury,et al.  Trade-off in ecosystem services of the Somerset Levels and Moors wetlands , 2011 .

[35]  C. Findlay,et al.  The Rauischholzhausen Agenda for Road Ecology , 2007 .

[36]  Robert J. Naiman,et al.  Guest Editorial, part of a Special Feature on Restoring Riverine Landscapes Restoring Riverine Landscapes: The Challenge of Identifying Priorities, Reference States, and Techniques , 2007 .

[37]  S. Running,et al.  Multiscale geomorphic drivers of groundwater flow paths: subsurface hydrologic dynamics and hyporheic habitat diversity , 2006, Journal of the North American Benthological Society.

[38]  A. Casper,et al.  Linking Ecosystem Services, Rehabilitation, and River Hydrogeomorphology , 2010 .

[39]  R. Haines-Young,et al.  Ecosystem Ecology: The links between biodiversity, ecosystem services and human well-being , 2010 .

[40]  M. Ruckelshaus,et al.  Restoring Rivers in the Twenty-First Century: Science Challenges in a Management Context , 2009 .

[41]  N. LeRoy Poff,et al.  MEETING ECOLOGICAL AND SOCIETAL NEEDS FOR FRESHWATER , 2002 .

[42]  Mathieu Rouget,et al.  Integrating ecosystem services into conservation assessments: a review. , 2007 .

[43]  W. Junk.  The flood pulse concept in river-floodplain systems , 1989 .

[44]  Margaret A. Palmer,et al.  Restoration of Ecosystem Services for Environmental Markets , 2009, Science.

[45]  D. Teuscher,et al.  Relative Return to Creel of Triploid and Diploid Rainbow Trout Stocked in Eighteen Idaho Streams , 2000 .

[46]  Angela H. Arthington,et al.  Preserving the biodiversity and ecological services of rivers: new challenges and research opportunities: Preserving the biodiversity and ecological services of rivers , 2010 .

[47]  T. Beechie,et al.  Global Review of the Physical and Biological Effectiveness of Stream Habitat Rehabilitation Techniques , 2008 .

[48]  G. Minshall,et al.  The River Continuum Concept , 1980 .

[49]  Stephen R. Carpenter,et al.  Freshwater ecosystem services. , 1997 .

[50]  Mark E. Borsuk,et al.  Concepts of decision support for river rehabilitation , 2007, Environ. Model. Softw..

[51]  G. Daily,et al.  Modeling multiple ecosystem services, biodiversity conservation, commodity production, and tradeoffs at landscape scales , 2009 .

[52]  M. Delong,et al.  The riverine ecosystem synthesis: biocomplexity in river networks across space and time , 2006 .

[53]  E. Tabacchi,et al.  Development, maintenance and role of riparian vegetation in the river landscape , 1998 .

[54]  S. Dufour,et al.  From the myth of a lost paradise to targeted river restoration: forget natural references and focus on human benefits , 2009 .

[55]  N. Holmes,et al.  Embedding a strategic approach to river restoration in operational management processes — experiences in England , 2010 .

[56]  Garry D. Peterson,et al.  Understanding relationships among multiple ecosystem services. , 2009, Ecology letters.

[57]  R. R. Goetz.  A Post-Project Assessment of the Provo River Restoration Project: Channel Design, Reconfiguration, and the Re-Establishment of Critical Physical Processes , 2008 .

[58]  D. Gilvear,et al.  Valley floor landscape change following almost 100 years of flood embankment abandonment on a wandering gravel‐bed river , 2002 .