Incorporating equity as part of the wider impacts in transport infrastructure assessment: an application of the SUMINI approach

The state of the art in appraisal of transport infrastructure (particularly for developed countries) is moving towards inclusivity of a set of wider impacts than has traditionally been the case. In appraisal frameworks generally Multi-Criteria Analysis (MCA), features as either an alternative to, or complementary with, Cost Benefit Analysis (CBA) particularly when assessing a wider set of distributional and other impacts. In that respect it goes some way towards addressing an identified weakness in conventional CBA. This paper proposes a new method to incorporate the wider impacts into the appraisal framework (SUMINI) based upon a composite indicator and MCA. The method is illustrated for a particular example of the wider set of impacts, i.e. equity, through the ex-post assessment of two large EU transport infrastructure (TEN-T) case studies. The results suggest that SUMINI assesses equity impacts well and the case studies highlight the flexibility of the approach in reflecting different policy or project objectives. The research concludes that this method should not be viewed as being in competition with traditional CBA, but that it could be an easily adopted and complementary approach. The value in the research is in providing a new and significant methodological advance to the historically difficult question of how to evaluate equity and other wider impacts. The research is of strong international significance due to the publication of the TEN-Ts review by the European Commission, as well as the transnational nature of large scale interurban transport schemes, the involvement of national and transnational stakeholder groups in the approval and funding of those schemes, the large numbers of population potentially subject to equity and other wider impacts and the degree of variation in the regional objectives and priorities for transport decision makers.

[1]  Luis Enrique Sánchez,et al.  Tiering strategic environmental assessment and project environmental impact assessment in highway planning in São Paulo, Brazil , 2008 .

[2]  Saltelli Andrea,et al.  Well-being stories , 2009 .

[3]  S. Proost,et al.  When are subsidies to trans-European network projects justified? , 2011 .

[4]  Andres Monzon,et al.  Evaluating the European added value of TEN-T projects: a methodological proposal based on spatial spillovers, accessibility and GIS , 2011 .

[5]  Gian-Claudia Sciara,et al.  Unraveling Equity in HOT Lane Planning , 2006 .

[6]  Tom Worsley The Evolution of London's Crossrail Scheme and the Development of the Department for Transport's Economic Appraisal Methods , 2011 .

[7]  C. D. Gamper,et al.  A conceptual approach to the use of Cost Benefit and Multi Criteria Analysis in natural hazard management , 2006 .

[8]  G. D. Rus Interurban Passenger Transport: Economic Assessment of Major Infrastructure Projects , 2009 .

[9]  P S Sriraj,et al.  Approach of Environmental Justice to Evaluate the Equitable Distribution of a Transit Capital Improvement Program , 2005 .

[10]  H Nakamura The economic evaluation of transport infrastructure: needs for international comparisons , 2000 .

[11]  Christopher J. Wolfe The Analytical Hierarch Process – An Aid To Decision Making , 1986 .

[12]  O. Johansson-Stenman,et al.  The Importance of Ethics in Environmental Economics with a Focus on Existence Values , 1998 .

[13]  H. Morisugi Evaluation methodologies of transportation projects in Japan , 2000 .

[14]  J. Gowdy The Revolution in Welfare Economics and Its Implications for Environmental Valuation and Policy , 2004, Land Economics.

[15]  Jennifer S. Shang,et al.  A unified framework for multicriteria evaluation of transportation projects , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management.

[16]  Mario R. Partidário Does SEA Change Outcomes , 2009 .

[17]  SPECIAL REPORT 303: EQUITY OF EVOLVING TRANSPORTATION FINANCE MECHANISMS: Remediating Inequity in Transportation Finance , 2009 .

[18]  Paul Timms,et al.  Transport models, philosophy and language , 2008 .

[19]  L. Phillips,et al.  Multi-criteria analysis: a manual , 2009 .

[20]  R. Camagni Territorial Impact Assessment for European regions: A methodological proposal and an application to EU transport policy. , 2009, Evaluation and program planning.

[21]  Stef Proost,et al.  Do the Selected Trans European Transport Investments Pass the Cost Benefit Test? , 2010 .

[22]  F. Schweigert The priority of justice: a framework approach to ethics in program evaluation. , 2007, Evaluation and program planning.

[23]  P Rietveld,et al.  WINNERS AND LOSERS IN TRANSPORT POLICY: ON EFFICIENCY, EQUITY, AND COMPENSATION. IN: HANDBOOK OF TRANSPORT AND THE ENVIRONMENT , 2003 .

[24]  N. Solomons International perspectives. , 2002, Journal of human nutrition and dietetics : the official journal of the British Dietetic Association.

[25]  G. Currie,et al.  Using Lorenz Curves to Assess Public Transit Equity , 2011 .

[26]  Patrick S. W. Fong,et al.  Value management for sustainable decision making , 2010 .

[27]  Terje Aven,et al.  Risk informed decision-making and its ethical basis , 2008, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[28]  M. Lewis,et al.  Public Private Partnerships: The Worldwide Revolution in Infrastructure Provision and Project Finance , 2004 .

[29]  Thomas Müller-Bohn,et al.  Cost-Benefit Analysis , 2015 .

[30]  Bert Van Wee,et al.  Evaluating Transport Infrastructure Investments: The Dutch Experience with a Standardized Approach , 2007 .

[31]  Andrew D Oxman,et al.  SUPPORT Tools for evidence-informed health Policymaking (STP) 10: Taking equity into consideration when assessing the findings of a systematic review , 2009, Health research policy and systems.

[32]  Helen Todd,et al.  Justice for the Environment: Developing a Set of Indicators of Environmental Justice for Scotland , 2005, Environmental Values.

[33]  B W Wiegmans The economics of a new rail freight line: the case of the Betuweline in the Netherlands , 2008 .

[34]  Qiang Wang,et al.  Transport infrastructure and regional economic growth: evidence from China , 2011 .

[35]  Humberto López,et al.  The Social Discount Rate: Estimates for Nine Latin American Countries , 2008 .

[36]  J. Baron Thinking and deciding, 3rd ed. , 2000 .

[37]  P. Mackie,et al.  Review of economic assessment in rural transport appraisal , 2009 .

[38]  Roger Vickerman,et al.  Cost — Benefit Analysis and Large-Scale Infrastructure Projects: State of the Art and Challenges , 2007 .

[39]  S. Phang Strategic Development of Airport and Rail Infrastructure: The Case of Singapore , 2003 .

[40]  Franklin Farell Roadmap to a Single European Transport Area: Towards a competitive and resource efficient transport system , 2014 .

[41]  Michel Beuthe Methods of Transport Project Evaluation: From cost-benefit to multiciteria and the decision framework , 2002 .

[42]  Stefan Hajkowicz,et al.  A comparison of multiple criteria analysis and unaided approaches to environmental decision making , 2007 .

[43]  Andrew C. Kadak,et al.  Intergenerational Considerations Affecting the Future of Nuclear Power: Equity as a Framework for Assessing Fuel Cycles , 2010, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[44]  A. Sen,et al.  Collective Choice and Social Welfare , 2017 .

[45]  Graham Currie,et al.  New Perspectives and Methods in Transport and Social Exclusion Research , 2011 .

[46]  S Grant-Muller,et al.  Incorporating equity considerations in transport infrastructure evaluation: Current practice and a proposed methodology. , 2009, Evaluation and program planning.

[47]  K. Zhou,et al.  EIA application in China's expressway infrastructure: clarifying the decision-making hierarchy. , 2011, Journal of environmental management.

[48]  M. Drummond,et al.  Explicit incorporation of equity considerations into economic evaluation of public health interventions , 2009, Health Economics, Policy and Law.

[49]  Werner Rothengatter Evaluation of infrastructure investments in Germany , 2000 .

[50]  Rodney Turner,et al.  Limits to CBA in UK and European environmental policy: retrospects and future prospects , 2007 .

[51]  Susan Grant-Muller,et al.  Economic appraisal of European transport projects: The state-of-the-art revisited , 2001 .

[52]  Harry Geerlings,et al.  Exposing weaknesses in interactive planning: the remarkable return of comprehensive policy analysis in The Netherlands , 2003 .

[53]  B K Olson THE TRANSPORTATION EQUITY ACT FOR THE 21ST CENTURY: THE FAILURE OF METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATIONS TO REFORM FEDERAL TRANSPORTATION POLICY IN METROPOLITAN AREAS , 2000 .

[54]  Steen Leleur,et al.  Composite decision support by combining cost-benefit and multi-criteria decision analysis , 2011, Decis. Support Syst..

[55]  C J Khisty,et al.  Operationalizing Concepts of Equity for Public Project Investments , 1996 .

[56]  Elizabeth Deakin,et al.  Sustainable Development & Sustainable Transportation: Strategies for Economic Prosperity, Environmental Quality, and Equity , 2001 .

[57]  David Anthoff,et al.  On International Equity Weights and National Decision Making on Climate Change , 2007, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[58]  Dimitrios A Tsamboulas,et al.  Use of Multicriteria Methods for Assessment of Transport Projects , 1999 .

[59]  H Dimitriou,et al.  Transportation Megaprojects, Globalization, and Place-Making in Hong Kong and South China , 2005 .

[60]  I. Wing,et al.  The Broader Benefits of Transportation Infrastructure , 2007 .

[61]  Rafael Saitua Some Considerations on Social Cost-Benefit Analysis as a Tool for Decision-Making , 2007 .

[62]  Eran Feitelson,et al.  Introducing environmental equity dimensions into the sustainable transport discourse: issues and pitfalls , 2002 .

[63]  J. Rawls,et al.  Some Reasons for the Maximin Criterion , 1974 .

[64]  D. Graham Agglomeration Economies and Transport Investment , 2007 .

[65]  Stef Proost,et al.  What Sustainable Road Transport Future?: Trends and Policy Options , 2010 .

[66]  B. Flyvbjerg Five Misunderstandings About Case-Study Research , 2006, 1304.1186.

[67]  P. Mackie,et al.  Planning for Transport in the Wake of Stern and Eddington , 2010 .

[68]  O. Bina,et al.  Theorising strategic environmental assessment: fresh perspectives and future challenges , 2007 .

[69]  E. Elder Sustainable development strategy , 2010 .

[70]  R. Carter,et al.  International Journal for Equity in Health Open Access a Cost-based Equity Weight for Use in the Economic Evaluation of Primary Health Care Interventions: Case Study of the Australian Indigenous Population , 2022 .

[71]  A. Muula,et al.  International Journal for Equity in Health Open Access Association between Maternal Use of Traditional Healer Services and Child Vaccination Coverage in Pont-sonde, Haiti , 2022 .

[72]  M. Florio Cost–benefit analysis and the European union cohesion fund: On the social cost of capital and labour , 2006 .

[73]  S. Mourato,et al.  Cost-Benefit Analysis and the Environment: Recent Developments , 2006 .

[74]  The Theory and Practice of Evaluation , 2000 .

[75]  P Mackie,et al.  COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS IN TRANSPORT. IN: HANDBOOK OF TRANSPORT SYSTEMS AND TRAFFIC CONTROL , 2001 .

[76]  Maria Berrittella,et al.  An Analytic Hierarchy Process for the Evaluation of Transport Policies to Reduce Climate Change Impacts , 2007 .

[77]  Jeffrey P. Cohen Economic Benefits of Investments in Transport Infrastructure , 2007 .

[78]  J. M. Bell,et al.  Philosophy and Medical Welfare , 1989 .

[79]  Rodrigo Jiliberto Herrera,et al.  The Contribution of Strategic Environmental Assessment to Transport Policy Governance , 2009 .

[80]  J. Sturm,et al.  IS PUBLIC-EXPENDITURE REALLY PRODUCTIVE - NEW EVIDENCE FOR THE USA AND THE NETHERLANDS , 1995 .

[81]  Bert van Wee Transport and Ethics. Ethics and the Evaluation of Transport Policies and Projects , 2011 .

[82]  David Alan Aschauer,et al.  IS PUBLIC EXPENDITURE PRODUCTIVE , 1989 .

[83]  Emile Quinet,et al.  The Practice of Cost-Benefit Analysis in Transport: The Case of France , 2010 .

[84]  Stefano Tarantola,et al.  Handbook on Constructing Composite Indicators: Methodology and User Guide , 2005 .

[85]  P Buchanan,et al.  Agglomeration benefits of Crossrail , 2006 .

[86]  Giles Atkinson,et al.  Balancing Competing Principles of Environmental Equity , 2000 .

[87]  P. Rogers,et al.  An Introduction to Sustainable Development , 2007 .

[88]  Alejandro Tudela,et al.  Comparing the output of cost benefit and multi-criteria analysis: An application to urban transport investments , 2006 .

[89]  B. Wee How suitable is CBA for the ex-ante evaluation of transport projects and policies? A discussion from the perspective of ethics , 2012 .

[90]  David A. Hensher,et al.  Handbook of Transport Modelling , 2000 .

[91]  Yoshihiko Hayashi,et al.  International comparison of background concept and methodology of transportation project appraisal , 2000 .

[92]  Union européenne,et al.  Handbook on Constructing Composite Indicators: Methodology and User Guide , 2008 .

[93]  Karst Teunis Geurs,et al.  Discussing Equity and Social Exclusion in Accessibility Evaluations , 2011, European Journal of Transport and Infrastructure Research.

[94]  Michael B. Lowry Online public deliberation for a regional transportation improvement decision , 2010 .

[95]  Yoram Shiftan,et al.  Transport Project Appraisal in Israel , 2008 .

[96]  Jean Hartley,et al.  Case study research , 2004 .

[97]  Glen Weisbrod,et al.  Extending monetary values to broader performance and impact measures: Transportation applications and lessons for other fields. , 2009, Evaluation and program planning.

[98]  Philip Allmendinger,et al.  Planning Futures: New Directions for Planning Theory , 2002 .

[99]  James Laird,et al.  Current Practice in Project Appraisal in Europe , 2005 .

[100]  Thomas L. and Beltran Miguel H. Saaty,et al.  Architectural Design by the Analytic Hierarchy Process , 1980 .

[101]  Emile Quinet,et al.  Evaluation methodologies of transportation projects in France , 2000 .

[102]  N. Wallerstein,et al.  Community-based participatory research contributions to intervention research: the intersection of science and practice to improve health equity. , 2010, American journal of public health.

[103]  Johannes Bröcker,et al.  Assessing Spatial Equity and Efficiency Impacts of Transport Infrastructure Projects , 2010 .

[104]  Eda Beyazit,et al.  Evaluating Social Justice in Transport: Lessons to be Learned from the Capability Approach , 2011 .

[105]  David A. Hensher,et al.  Handbook of Transport Strategy, Policy and Institutions , 2005 .

[106]  John Harris,et al.  More and Better Justice , 1988, Royal Institute of Philosophy Lecture Series.

[107]  Miguel Ángel Martínez,et al.  A model for assessing habitat fragmentation caused by new infrastructures in extensive territories - evaluation of the impact of the Spanish strategic infrastructure and transport plan. , 2010, Journal of environmental management.

[108]  Liisa Ecola,et al.  Making Congestion Pricing Equitable , 2010 .

[109]  David A. King Remediating Inequity in Transportation Finance , 2011 .

[110]  Karen Lucas,et al.  Transport, the Environment and Social Exclusion , 2001 .

[111]  Piet Rietveld,et al.  Winners and losers in Transport Policy: on Efficiency, Equity, and Compensation , 2003 .

[112]  Sotirios Thanos,et al.  Valuing Aircraft Noise: Stated Choice Experiments Reflecting Inter-Temporal Noise Changes from Airport Relocation , 2011 .

[113]  Bent Flyvbjerg,et al.  Planning and Foucault: In Search of the Dark Side of Planning Theory , 2001 .

[114]  H. Peyton Young,et al.  Equity - in theory and practice , 1994 .

[115]  Elvira Haezendonck,et al.  Transport Project Evaluation: Extending the Social Cost Benefit Approach , 2008 .

[116]  Thomas L. Saaty,et al.  Decision Making for Leaders: The Analytical Hierarchy Process for Decisions in a Complex World , 1982 .

[117]  Adrien J. Veron Brazil - Improving the appraisal framework for road transport infrastructure investments : elements for consideration , 2010 .