Category-based attentional guidance can operate in parallel for multiple target objects

The question whether the control of attention during visual search is always feature-based or can also be based on the category of objects remains unresolved. Here, we employed the N2pc component as an on-line marker for target selection processes to compare the efficiency of feature-based and category-based attentional guidance. Two successive displays containing pairs of real-world objects (line drawings of kitchen or clothing items) were separated by a 10 ms SOA. In Experiment 1, target objects were defined by their category. In Experiment 2, one specific visual object served as target (exemplar-based search). On different trials, targets appeared either in one or in both displays, and participants had to report the number of targets (one or two). Target N2pc components were larger and emerged earlier during exemplar-based search than during category-based search, demonstrating the superior efficiency of feature-based attentional guidance. On trials where target objects appeared in both displays, both targets elicited N2pc components that overlapped in time, suggesting that attention was allocated in parallel to these target objects. Critically, this was the case not only in the exemplar-based task, but also when targets were defined by their category. These results demonstrate that attention can be guided by object categories, and that this type of category-based attentional control can operate concurrently for multiple target objects.

[1]  Jeff Miller,et al.  Using the jackknife-based scoring method for measuring LRP onset effects in factorial designs. , 2001, Psychophysiology.

[2]  Martin Eimer,et al.  What top-down task sets do for us: an ERP study on the benefits of advance preparation in visual search. , 2011, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[3]  Geoffrey F. Woodman,et al.  Electrophysiological measurement of rapid shifts of attention during visual search , 1999, Nature.

[4]  Martin Eimer,et al.  Target objects defined by a conjunction of colour and shape can be selected independently and in parallel , 2017, Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics.

[5]  Antje S. Meyer,et al.  Electrophysiological Evidence of Semantic Interference in Visual Search , 2010, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[6]  Martin Eimer,et al.  Rapid attentional selection processes operate independently and in parallel for multiple targets , 2016, Biological Psychology.

[7]  Martin Eimer,et al.  Spatial Attention Can Be Allocated Rapidly and in Parallel to New Visual Objects , 2014, Current Biology.

[8]  Gregory J. Zelinsky,et al.  Visual search is guided to categorically-defined targets , 2009, Vision Research.

[9]  Martin Eimer,et al.  Rapid parallel attentional target selection in single-color and multiple-color visual search. , 2015, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[10]  M. Brodeur,et al.  The Bank of Standardized Stimuli (BOSS), a New Set of 480 Normative Photos of Objects to Be Used as Visual Stimuli in Cognitive Research , 2010, PloS one.

[11]  Dwight J. Kravitz,et al.  The ventral visual pathway: an expanded neural framework for the processing of object quality , 2013, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[12]  Vincent Di Lollo,et al.  Electrophysiological Indices of Target and Distractor Processing in Visual Search , 2009, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[13]  Martin Eimer,et al.  Rapid Parallel Attentional Selection Can Be Controlled by Shape and Alphanumerical Category , 2016, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[14]  George L. Malcolm,et al.  The effects of target template specificity on visual search in real-world scenes: evidence from eye movements. , 2009, Journal of vision.

[15]  P. Roelfsema,et al.  Different States in Visual Working Memory: When It Guides Attention and When It Does Not , 2022 .

[16]  Jan Theeuwes,et al.  Electrophysiological Evidence of the Capture of Visual Attention , 2013, J. Cogn. Neurosci..

[17]  L. Chelazzi,et al.  Associative knowledge controls deployment of visual selective attention , 2003, Nature Neuroscience.

[18]  J. Duncan The locus of interference in the perception of simultaneous stimuli. , 1980, Psychological review.

[19]  J. Wolfe,et al.  Guided Search 2.0 A revised model of visual search , 1994, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[20]  S J Luck,et al.  Spatial filtering during visual search: evidence from human electrophysiology. , 1994, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[21]  J. Duncan,et al.  Beyond the search surface: visual search and attentional engagement. , 1992, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[22]  P. Lachenbruch Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (2nd ed.) , 1989 .

[23]  M. Eimer The N2pc component as an indicator of attentional selectivity. , 1996, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[24]  Howard E. Egeth,et al.  Parallel processing of multielement displays , 1972 .

[25]  A. Treisman,et al.  A feature-integration theory of attention , 1980, Cognitive Psychology.

[26]  Martin Eimer,et al.  Item and category-based attentional control during search for real-world objects: Can you find the pants among the pans? , 2014, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[27]  P. Dixon,et al.  Conceptual and physical differences in the category effect , 1987, Perception & psychophysics.

[28]  J. Wolfe,et al.  What attributes guide the deployment of visual attention and how do they do it? , 2004, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[29]  Geoffrey F Woodman,et al.  Serial deployment of attention during visual search. , 2003, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[30]  S. Luck,et al.  Neural sources of focused attention in visual search. , 2000, Cerebral cortex.

[31]  Jeff Miller,et al.  Jackknife-based method for measuring LRP onset latency differences. , 1998, Psychophysiology.

[32]  David J. Freedman,et al.  Neural correlates of categories and concepts , 2003, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[33]  R. Desimone,et al.  Neural mechanisms of selective visual attention. , 1995, Annual review of neuroscience.

[34]  Jeremy M. Wolfe,et al.  Guided Search 4.0: Current Progress With a Model of Visual Search , 2007, Integrated Models of Cognitive Systems.

[35]  M. Eimer The neural basis of attentional control in visual search , 2014, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[36]  Eva Belke,et al.  Top-down effects of semantic knowledge in visual search are modulated by cognitive but not perceptual load , 2008, Perception & psychophysics.

[37]  Jacob Cohen Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences , 1969, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.