The Operational Infrastructure of Secondary-Level CTE: Definition, Validation, and Application.

The profession of career and technical education (CTE) at the secondary level has become increasingly complicated. The need or requirement of CTE agencies (local, state, and university) to measure progress, synthesize responsibilities, and integrate disciplines has never been more prominent, nor emphasized. State and local CTE agencies are required in the form of new legislation, regulations, and procedures to take on this administrative burden with, in many instances, dwindling budgets. This has led to the uncomfortable, but all too common, practice of decreasing or eliminating support for basic operational criteria such as the ones defined and validated in this piece of research. For example, the CTE state-level administration in one of the researcher's state has eliminated certain teacher education grants in order to help fund accountability measures put forth by Perkins IV. These teacher education grants were generally used to help improve and maintain CTE teacher education programs and/or recruit quality CTE teacher candidates. As Dr. Richard Lynch, CTE teacher educator, once stated, "...without good teachers, you cannot have good instruction nor good programs. The studies on the education and re-education of good teachers...indicate that effective teacher education takes time and it takes money" (NCRVE, 1991, p. 23). Yet, as state and local budgets decrease, some programs and/or initiatives must take the brunt of fiscal belt tightening. Of course, these programs and/or initiatives are generally not the ones that new federal and state guidelines or regulations are requiring state and/or local CTE agencies to increase or emphasize. What effect does this have on the general operation of secondary-level CTE? While no new legislation or accountability measure can account for all of the factors, what does such a change do to the objectives, tasks, programs, and/or initiatives not included in the new legislation or measure?

[1]  R. A. Manley The Decentralization of Perkins: History, Impact, and Recommendations for Future CTE Legislation. , 2011 .

[2]  R. A. Manley The intended and unintended consequences of the 1990 Carl D. Perkins Vocational and Applied Technology Act Within-state Funding Formula Change: A Modified Policy Delphi Study , 2010 .

[3]  K. Plinske,et al.  Trustees’ Perceptions of the Desired Qualifications for the Next Generation of Community College Presidents , 2010 .

[4]  Steven M. Welch,et al.  An Examination of Leadership Issues Facing Pennsylvania Career and Technical Administrators. , 2010 .

[5]  Eric Tuxworth,et al.  Competence based education and training: background and origins , 2005 .

[6]  Mary Kay Rayens,et al.  Building Consensus Using the Policy Delphi Method , 2000 .

[7]  Ralph C. Wenrich,et al.  Administration of Vocational Education , 1988 .

[8]  R. Norton,et al.  Administrator Competency Study: A National Identification and Verification of the Competencies Important to Secondary and Postsecondary Administrators of Vocational and Technical Education. , 1987 .

[9]  W. Stevenson An Assessment of the Governance and Administration of Vocational-Technical Education in Utah. , 1982 .

[10]  R. D. Ruff A Study of State Level Administration of Vocational Education. , 1981 .

[11]  Robert E. Norton,et al.  The Development of Competency-Based Instructional Materials for the Preparation of Local Administrators of Secondary and Post-Secondary Vocational Education. Final Report: Development of Competency-Based Instructional Materials for Local Vocational Education Administrators--Part II. Research and Dev , 1977 .

[12]  Bill W. Stevenson The Role of Vocational-Technical Education in the University. , 1963 .