The Barrow Randomized Operating Room Traffic (BRITE) Trial: An Observational Study on the Effect of Operating Room Traffic on Infection Rates.

S urgical site infections (SSIs) account for 14% to 20% of all nosocomial infections. They have been shown to increase a patient’s risk of death 2to 11-fold, and they cost our nation an estimated $3.5 to $10 billion annually. Neurosurgical SSIs are of particular concern, because the potential consequences of SSIs in the central nervous system are dire. SSIs are known to be multifactorial, with a large number of both fixed and modifiable risk factors present in the preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative periods. Among the modifiable intraoperative risk factors, cleanliness of the operating room (OR) environment is often targeted in SSI prevention strategies. Observational studies have shown that OR bacterial air counts are directly related to OR activity. As such, several national organizations, including the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), the Joint Commission, and the Association of Operative Registered Nurses, have published recommendations for reducing SSIs that include calls to restrict OR traffic to essential personnel only. In the 15 years since publication of these recommendations, numerous studies have been published that attempt to correlate OR traffic with SSI risk. The level of evidence in these studies is low, with major methodological flaws and heterogeneous methods making it difficult to interpret what effect, if any, reducing OR traffic has on SSI rate. The purpose of this study was to provide high-quality evidence regarding the effect of OR traffic on SSI risk.

[1]  Philippe Saliou,et al.  Influence of Staff Behavior on Infectious Risk in Operating Rooms: What Is the Evidence? , 2015, Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology.

[2]  L. Spruce Back to basics: preventing surgical site infections. , 2014, AORN journal.

[3]  Claude Deschamps,et al.  Chasing Zero: The Drive to Eliminate Surgical Site Infections , 2011, Annals of surgery.

[4]  R G Newcombe,et al.  Four country healthcare associated infection prevalence survey 2006: overview of the results. , 2008, The Journal of hospital infection.

[5]  W E Wilkinson,et al.  The Impact of Surgical-Site Infections in the 1990s: Attributable Mortality, Excess Length of Hospitalization, And Extra Costs , 1999, Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology.

[6]  Teresa C. Horan,et al.  Guideline for Prevention of Surgical Site Infection, 1999 , 1999, Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology.

[7]  T. Horan,et al.  Guideline for prevention of surgical site infection. , 2000, Bulletin of the American College of Surgeons.

[8]  M. Gilchrist Recommendations for Preventing the Spread of Vancomycin Resistance , 1995, Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology.

[9]  G. Ayliffe,et al.  Role of the environment of the operating suite in surgical wound infection. , 1991, Reviews of infectious diseases.