Adolescent development of inhibition as a function of SES and gender: Converging evidence from behavior and fMRI

The ability to adaptively inhibit responses to tempting/distracting stimuli in the pursuit of goals is an essential set of skills necessary for adult competence and wellbeing. These inhibitory capacities develop throughout childhood, with growing evidence of important maturational changes occurring in adolescence. There also has been intense interest in the role of social adversity on the development of executive function, including inhibitory control. We hypothesized that the onset of adolescence could be a time of particular opportunity/vulnerability in the development of inhibition due to the large degree of maturational changes in neural systems involved in regulatory control. We investigated this hypothesis in a longitudinal study of adolescents by examining the impact of socioeconomic status (SES) on the maturation of inhibition and concurrent brain function. Furthermore, we examined gender as a potential moderator of this relationship, given evidence of gender‐specificity in the developmental pathways of inhibition as well as sex differences in adolescent development. Results reveal that lower SES is associated with worse behavioral inhibition over time and a concurrent increase in anterior cingulate (ACC) activation, but only in girls. We also found that lower SES girls exhibited decreased ACC ↔ dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (dlPFC) coupling over time. Our findings suggest that female adolescents with lower SES appear to develop less efficient inhibitory processing in dlPFC, requiring greater and relatively unsuccessful compensatory recruitment of ACC. In summary, the present study provides a novel window into the neural mechanisms by which the influence of SES on inhibition may be transmitted during adolescence. Hum Brain Mapp 36:3194–3203, 2015. © 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

[1]  M. Hagger,et al.  Ego depletion and the strength model of self-control: a meta-analysis. , 2010, Psychological bulletin.

[2]  V. Mcloyd,et al.  Socioeconomic disadvantage and child development. , 1998, The American psychologist.

[3]  M. Farah,et al.  Childhood poverty: Specific associations with neurocognitive development , 2006, Brain Research.

[4]  Ernest Lo,et al.  Impulsivity and socio-economic status interact to increase the risk of gambling onset among youth. , 2010, Addiction.

[5]  R. Bradley,et al.  Socioeconomic status and child development. , 2002, Annual review of psychology.

[6]  Ulrich Müller,et al.  The development of executive function in early childhood. , 1991, Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development.

[7]  N. Lazar,et al.  Maturation of cognitive processes from late childhood to adulthood. , 2004, Child development.

[8]  A. Baum,et al.  Socioeconomic Status and Chronic Stress: Does Stress Account for SES Effects on Health? , 1999, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[9]  J. Heckman,et al.  A gradient of childhood self-control predicts health, wealth, and public safety , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[10]  R D Conger,et al.  Coming of age too early: pubertal influences on girls' vulnerability to psychological distress. , 1996, Child development.

[11]  E. Crone,et al.  Understanding adolescence as a period of social–affective engagement and goal flexibility , 2012, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[12]  Laure Zago,et al.  Shifting from the Perceptual Brain to the Logical Brain: The Neural Impact of Cognitive Inhibition Training , 2000, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[13]  D. Bjorklund,et al.  Parental investment theory and gender differences in the evolution of inhibition mechanisms. , 1996, Psychological bulletin.

[14]  Leon Feinstein,et al.  Inequality in the Early Cognitive Development of British Children in the 1970 Cohort , 2003 .

[15]  R. Kessler,et al.  Mood disorders in children and adolescents: an epidemiologic perspective , 2001, Biological Psychiatry.

[16]  D. Clark,et al.  Childhood risk categories for adolescent substance involvement: a general liability typology. , 2005, Drug and alcohol dependence.

[17]  Monique Ernst,et al.  Early-life stress is associated with impairment in cognitive control in adolescence: An fMRI study , 2010, Neuropsychologia.

[18]  J. Zubieta,et al.  Sex differences in anterior cingulate cortex activation during impulse inhibition and behavioral correlates , 2012, Psychiatry Research: Neuroimaging.

[19]  R. Elliott,et al.  Response inhibition and impulsivity: an fMRI study , 2003, Neuropsychologia.

[20]  Vivian Zayas,et al.  Predicting Cognitive Control From Preschool to Late Adolescence and Young Adulthood , 2006, Psychological science.

[21]  M. Fox,et al.  The global signal and observed anticorrelated resting state brain networks. , 2009, Journal of neurophysiology.

[22]  John J. Foxe,et al.  Prefrontal‐subcortical dissociations underlying inhibitory control revealed by event‐related fMRI , 2004, The European journal of neuroscience.

[23]  S. Bunge,et al.  Neurodevelopmental changes in working memory and cognitive control , 2007, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[24]  T. Robbins,et al.  Inhibition and the right inferior frontal cortex , 2004, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[25]  D. Amso,et al.  Development of cognitive control and executive functions from 4 to 13 years: Evidence from manipulations of memory, inhibition, and task switching , 2006, Neuropsychologia.

[26]  M. Beydoun,et al.  The obesity epidemic in the United States--gender, age, socioeconomic, racial/ethnic, and geographic characteristics: a systematic review and meta-regression analysis. , 2007, Epidemiologic reviews.

[27]  T. James-Todd,et al.  The impact of socioeconomic status across early life on age at menarche among a racially diverse population of girls. , 2010, Annals of epidemiology.

[28]  M. Rushworth,et al.  Behavioral / Systems / Cognitive Connectivity-Based Parcellation of Human Cingulate Cortex and Its Relation to Functional Specialization , 2008 .

[29]  A. B. Hollingshead,et al.  Four factor index of social status , 1975 .

[30]  Eric Stice,et al.  Body mass correlates inversely with inhibitory control in response to food among adolescent girls: An fMRI study , 2010, NeuroImage.

[31]  Ronald E. Dahl,et al.  Pubertal development and behavior: Hormonal activation of social and motivational tendencies , 2010, Brain and Cognition.