The use of digital imaging for colour matching and communication in restorative dentistry

Objective To develop a shade matching method based on digital imaging and to compare observers' ability using this method with the conventional one set against a spectrophotometric 'gold standard'.Methods Two Vita Lumin shade guides were used in this study, nine shades being selected from the first Vita Lumin shade guide, A2, A3, A3.5, B2, B3, B4, C1, C2 and C3. A second shade guide was used to match the selected shades. A Nikon Coolpix 990 digital camera with Nikon SB21B ring flash was used to record the digital images of the shade tabs of the two shade guides and the images were processed using Adobe Photoshop software. A total of 27 samples (three replicates of each shade of the nine tabs selected) were matched with a digital shade guide prepared from the digital images of the second shade guide by 10 observers on a computer screen (computerised matching method). The 10 observers also matched the same shade tabs using the conventional matching method simulated in a phantom head. In addition, colour values were obtained from the digital images using Adobe Photoshop and quantified according to an internationally recognised scale as CIELAB colour values, L*,a*,b*. The relationship of the digitally derived CIELAB values to the CIELAB values obtained using a reflectance spectrophotometer was investigated.Results The cross tabulation statistical analysis showed a statistically significant difference (p<0.001) between the conventional method and the computer method with a 43% and 61.1% correct match respectively. There was also a statistically significant difference between observers in both methods (p<0.001 and p<0.04 for the conventional and computer methods respectively). A statistically significant high correlation of the CIELAB colour values were found between both colour measurement methods (p<0.001).Conclusion The observers' shade matching performance was significantly better with the computer method compared with the conventional one. There was a large variation in the observers' matching ability. The digital camera can be used as a means of colour measurements in the dental clinic.

[1]  Michael Pointer,et al.  Measurement of appearance , 2002, Other Conferences.

[2]  R. C. Sproull,et al.  Color matching in dentistry. Part II. Practical applications of the organization of color. 1973. , 1973, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[3]  D J Horn,et al.  Sphere spectrophotometer versus human evaluation of tooth shade. , 1998, Journal of endodontics.

[4]  M. Kinirons,et al.  Use of a common shade guide to test the perception of differences in the shades and value by members of the dental team. , 1999, Primary dental care : journal of the Faculty of General Dental Practitioners.

[5]  Smith Pw,et al.  Shade selection for single-unit anterior metal ceramic crowns: a 5-year retrospective study of 2,500 cases. , 1998 .

[6]  B. Potter,et al.  Assessing dentin color changes from nightguard vital bleaching. , 1999, Journal of the American Dental Association.

[7]  Rolf G. Kuehni,et al.  An Experiment in Visual Scaling of Small Color Differences* , 1979, Color Research &amp; Application.

[8]  C Bentley,et al.  Quantitation of vital bleaching by computer analysis of photographic images. , 1999, Journal of the American Dental Association.

[9]  W M Johnston,et al.  Assessment of Appearance Match by Visual Observation and Clinical Colorimetry , 1989, Journal of dental research.

[10]  S. Rinke,et al.  Colorimetric analysis as a means of quality control for dental ceramic materials. , 1996, The European journal of prosthodontics and restorative dentistry.

[11]  W M Johnston,et al.  Spectrophotometric analysis of color differences between porcelain systems. , 1986, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[12]  D. B. Judd,et al.  Final Report of the O.S.A. Subcommittee on the Spacing of the Munsell Colors , 1943 .

[13]  J D Preston,et al.  Current status of shade selection and color matching. , 1985, Quintessence international.

[14]  W D Culpepper,et al.  A comparative study of shade-matching procedures. , 1970, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[15]  R D Douglas,et al.  Predicting porcelain thickness required for dental shade matches. , 1999, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[16]  D. L. Macadam,et al.  The measurement of appearance , 1975 .

[17]  C. Groh,et al.  Sources of color variation on firing porcelain. , 1991, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.

[18]  R S Schwartz,et al.  Evaluation of a custom porcelain-fused-to-metal shade guide. , 1986, Quintessence international.