Measuring blood volume and vascular transfer constant from dynamic, T  2* ‐weighted contrast‐enhanced MRI

Dynamic, contrast‐enhanced MRI (deMRI) is increasingly being used to evaluate cerebral microcirculation. There are two different approaches for analyzing deMRI data. Intravascular indicator dilution theory has been used to estimate blood volume (and perfusion), usually from T2‐ or T  2* ‐weighted images of the first pass of the bolus. However, the theory assumes that the tracer (i.e., contrast agent) remains intravascular, which is often not the case when the blood–brain barrier (BBB) is damaged. Furthermore, the method provides no information on the vascular transfer constant. Pharmacokinetic modeling analyses of T1‐weighted images after first pass do give values of the vascular transfer constant and the volume of the extravascular, extracellular space (EES), but they generally are unable to give estimates of blood volume. In this study we apply pharmacokinetic modeling to dynamic T  2* ‐weighted imaging of the first pass of a tracer bolus. This method, which we call first‐pass pharmacokinetic modeling (FPPM), gives an estimate of the blood volume, vascular transfer constant, and EES volume. The method was applied to a group of 26 patients with surgically proven tumors (10 glioblastomas multiforme (GBMs), six lymphomas, and 10 meningiomas). The measurements of the blood volume and transfer constant were consistent with the known physiology of these tumors. Magn Reson Med 51:961–968, 2004. © 2004 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.

[1]  W. J. Lorenz,et al.  Quantification of regional cerebral blood flow and volume with dynamic susceptibility contrast-enhanced MR imaging. , 1994, Radiology.

[2]  J Sau,et al.  A model of the dual effect of gadopentetate dimeglumine on dynamic brain MR images , 1999, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[3]  Glyn Johnson,et al.  Dynamic, contrast‐enhanced perfusion MRI in mouse gliomas: Correlation with histopathology , 2003, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[4]  B. Rosen,et al.  High resolution measurement of cerebral blood flow using intravascular tracer bolus passages. Part I: Mathematical approach and statistical analysis , 1996, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[5]  P. Tofts Optimal detection of blood-brain barrier defects with Gd-DTPA MRI-the influences of delayed imaging and optimised repetition time. , 1996, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[6]  B. Rosen,et al.  Perfusion imaging with NMR contrast agents , 1990, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[7]  G. Johnson,et al.  Dynamic susceptibility contrast MR imaging: Correlation of signal intensity changes with cerebral blood volume measurements , 2000, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[8]  W. Rooney,et al.  Determination of the MRI contrast agent concentration time course in vivo following bolus injection: Effect of equilibrium transcytolemmal water exchange , 2000, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[9]  K. Plate,et al.  Angiogenesis in malignant gliomas , 1995, Glia.

[10]  A. Jackson,et al.  Simultaneous mapping of blood volume and endothelial permeability surface area product in gliomas using iterative analysis of first-pass dynamic contrast enhanced MRI data. , 2003, The British journal of radiology.

[11]  J C Waterton,et al.  Quantification of endothelial permeability, leakage space, and blood volume in brain tumors using combined T1 and T2* contrast‐enhanced dynamic MR imaging , 2000, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[12]  M. Knopp,et al.  Estimating kinetic parameters from dynamic contrast‐enhanced t1‐weighted MRI of a diffusable tracer: Standardized quantities and symbols , 1999, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[13]  D. Gadian,et al.  Delay and dispersion effects in dynamic susceptibility contrast MRI: Simulations using singular value decomposition , 2000, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[14]  G Johnson,et al.  Dynamic contrast-enhanced T2-weighted MR imaging of recurrent malignant gliomas treated with thalidomide and carboplatin. , 2000, AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology.

[15]  Richard S. J. Frackowiak,et al.  Cerebral blood flow, blood volume and oxygen utilization. Normal values and effect of age. , 1990, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[16]  G Johnson,et al.  Glial neoplasms: dynamic contrast-enhanced T2*-weighted MR imaging. , 1999, Radiology.

[17]  M A Viergever,et al.  Simultaneous quantitative cerebral perfusion and Gd‐DTPA extravasation measurement with dual‐echo dynamic susceptibility contrast MRI , 2000, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[18]  A R Padhani,et al.  Probing tumor microvascularity by measurement, analysis and display of contrast agent uptake kinetics , 1997, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[19]  A P Pathak,et al.  Utility of simultaneously acquired gradient‐echo and spin‐echo cerebral blood volume and morphology maps in brain tumor patients , 2000, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[20]  L. Axel Cerebral blood flow determination by rapid-sequence computed tomography: theoretical analysis. , 1980, Radiology.

[21]  P. Robinson,et al.  MEASUREMENT OF BLOOD‐BRAIN BARRIER PERMEABILITY , 1990, Clinical and experimental pharmacology & physiology.

[22]  Gary H. Glover,et al.  Assessment of Hemodynamic Response during Focal Neural Activity in Human Using Bolus Tracking, Arterial Spin Labeling and BOLD Techniques , 2000, NeuroImage.

[23]  P. Tofts Modeling tracer kinetics in dynamic Gd‐DTPA MR imaging , 1997, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[24]  P. Tofts,et al.  Measurement of the blood‐brain barrier permeability and leakage space using dynamic MR imaging. 1. Fundamental concepts , 1991, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[25]  K. Plate,et al.  Vascular morphology and angiogenesis in glial tumors. , 1995, Experimental and toxicologic pathology : official journal of the Gesellschaft fur Toxikologische Pathologie.

[26]  E F Halpern,et al.  Cerebral blood volume maps of gliomas: comparison with tumor grade and histologic findings. , 1994, Radiology.

[27]  W P Dillon,et al.  Quantitative measurement of microvascular permeability in human brain tumors achieved using dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging: correlation with histologic grade. , 2000, AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology.

[28]  K. Scheffler,et al.  Dynamic susceptibility contrast MR imaging of plaque development in multiple sclerosis: Application of an extended blood‐brain barrier leakage correction , 2000, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[29]  B R Rosen,et al.  Echo-planar MR determination of relative cerebral blood volume in human brain tumors: T1 versus T2 weighting. , 1996, AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology.

[30]  F. A. Seiler,et al.  Numerical Recipes in C: The Art of Scientific Computing , 1989 .

[31]  P. Wen,et al.  Malignant gliomas , 2004, Current neurology and neuroscience reports.