New Wine in Different Bottles: Negotiating and Selling the CAP post-2013 Reform

This article investigates the policy discourses at European level and in France, Germany and the UK during the debate on the CAP (Common Agricultural Policy) post-2013 reform. The neoliberal discourse that has provided the intellectual justification for reform during the last decade is now increasingly combined with a ‘public goods’ discourse related to the multifunctionalist discourse of the 1990s. Innovating on earlier discursive analyses of the CAP debate, this article distinguishes between discourses used during the uploading (negotiations) and the downloading (implementation) phases. In doing so it uncovers the effects of domestic-international interactions on the application of different competing discourses. The member states' domestic legitimating discourses applied to ‘sell’ the eventual CAP agreement tend to align with existing domestic policy paradigms rather than with dominant discourses at the EU level, indicating that discourses are prone to strategic usage.

[1]  S. Surminski.  Submission to the inquiry on 'Future flood prevention' by the House of Commons Select Committee on Environment, Food and Rural Affairs , 2016 .

[2]  V. Schmidt,et al.  The clash of Titans: France, Germany and the discursive double game of EMU reform , 2014 .

[3]  V. Schmidt.  Speaking to the Markets or to the People? A Discursive Institutionalist Analysis of the EU's Sovereign Debt Crisis , 2014 .

[4]  C. Termeer,et al.  Framing scale increase in Dutch agricultural policy 1950–2012 , 2013 .

[5]  J. Dwyer,et al.  More New Wine in the same Old Bottles? The evolving nature of the CAP reform debate in Europe, 2010-11, and prospects for the future. , 2014 .

[6]  S. Tellmann.  The constrained influence of discourses: the case of Norwegian climate policy , 2012 .

[7]  C. Daugbjerg,et al.  Ideational Change in the WTO and its Impacts on EU Agricultural Policy Institutions and the CAP , 2009 .

[8]  E. Erjavec,et al.  Changing EU agricultural policy discourses? The discourse analysis of Commissioner's speeches 2000-2007 , 2009 .

[9]  E. Erjavec,et al.  New Wine in Old Bottles : Critical Discourse Analysis of the Current Common EU Agricultural Policy Reform Agenda , 2009 .

[10]  V. Schmidt.  Discursive Institutionalism: The Explanatory Power of Ideas and Discourse , 2008 .

[11]  C. Potter,et al.  Agricultural multifunctionality, environmental sustainability and the WTO: Resistance or accommodation to the neoliberal project for agriculture? , 2007 .

[12]  I. Garzon.  Reforming the Common Agricultural Policy , 2006 .

[13]  C. Potter,et al.  Agricultural policy discourses in the European post-Fordist transition: neoliberalism, neomercantilism and multifunctionality , 2005 .

[14]  Eve Fouilleux.  CAP Reforms and Multilateral Trade Negotiations: Another View on Discourse Efficiency , 2004 .

[15]  W. Coleman.  From protected development to market liberalism: paradigm change in agriculture , 1998 .

[16]  W. Grant,et al.  Policy convergence and policy feedback: Agricultural finance policies in a globalizing era , 1998 .

[17]  G. Skogstad.  Ideas, Paradigms and Institutions: Agricultural Exceptionalism in the European Union and the United States , 1998 .

[18]  P. Hall.  Policy paradigms, social learning, and the state: the case of economic policymaking in Britain , 1993 .