Improved Strategies of Multi-objective Differential Evolution (MODE) for Multi-objective Optimization

Multi-objective optimization using an evolutionary computation technique is used extensively for solving conflicting multi-objective optimization problems. In this work, an improved strategy of multi-objective differential evolution (MODE) where the mutation strategy is changed to a trigonometric mutation approach is proposed. The proposed strategy along with other well known strategies of MODE is used to compare the performance metrics (such as convergence and divergence) with other evolutionary algorithms from the literature. The Pareto optimal solutions are obtained for benchmark test functions and are compared using several strategies of MODE. Improved strategies of MODE show a competitive performance when compared with other evolutionary multi-objective optimization algorithms (EMOAs).

[1]  C. Poloni,et al.  Hybridization of a multi-objective genetic algorithm, a neural network and a classical optimizer for a complex design problem in fluid dynamics , 2000 .

[2]  B. V. Babu,et al.  Elitist - Multi-objective Differential Evolution (E-MODE) Algorithm for Multi-objective Optimization , 2007, IICAI.

[3]  J. D. Schaffer,et al.  Some experiments in machine learning using vector evaluated genetic algorithms (artificial intelligence, optimization, adaptation, pattern recognition) , 1984 .

[4]  Pallavi G. Chakole,et al.  Multiobjective Optimization Using Differential Evolution , 2005 .

[5]  R. K. Ursem Multi-objective Optimization using Evolutionary Algorithms , 2009 .

[6]  Santosh K. Gupta,et al.  Multi-objective optimization of an industrial fluidized-bed catalytic cracking unit (FCCU) using genetic algorithm (GA) with the jumping genes operator , 2003, Comput. Chem. Eng..

[7]  B. Babu,et al.  Strategies of Multi-Objective Differential Evolution (MODE) for Optimization of Adiabatic Styrene Reactor , 2007 .

[8]  Godfrey C. Onwubolu,et al.  New optimization techniques in engineering , 2004, Studies in Fuzziness and Soft Computing.

[9]  Rainer Storn,et al.  Differential Evolution-A simple evolution strategy for fast optimization , 1997 .

[10]  B. V. Babu,et al.  Hybrid multi-objective differential evolution (H-MODE) for optimisation of polyethylene terephthalate (PET) reactor , 2010, Int. J. Bio Inspired Comput..

[11]  T. T. Binh MOBES : A multiobjective evolution strategy for constrained optimization problems , 1997 .

[12]  B. V. Babu,et al.  Multiobjective differential evolution (MODE) for optimization of adiabatic styrene reactor , 2005 .

[13]  Santosh K. Gupta,et al.  Multi-objective optimization of an industrial fluidized-bed catalytic cracking unit (FCCU) using two jumping gene adaptations of simulated annealing , 2007, Comput. Chem. Eng..

[14]  Kalyanmoy Deb,et al.  A Fast Elitist Non-dominated Sorting Genetic Algorithm for Multi-objective Optimisation: NSGA-II , 2000, PPSN.

[15]  B. V. Babu,et al.  Multi-objective differential evolution (MODE) for optimization of supply chain planning and management , 2007, 2007 IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation.

[16]  Ashish M. Gujarathi,et al.  Improved Multiobjective Differential Evolution (MODE) Approach for Purified Terephthalic Acid (PTA) Oxidation Process , 2009 .

[17]  Jouni Lampinen,et al.  A Trigonometric Mutation Operation to Differential Evolution , 2003, J. Glob. Optim..

[18]  B. Babu,et al.  Differential evolution for multi-objective optimization , 2003, The 2003 Congress on Evolutionary Computation, 2003. CEC '03..