Blind image restoration with eigen-face subspace

Performance of conventional image restoration methods is sensitive to signal-to-noise ratios. For heavily blurred and noisy human facial images, information contained in the eigen-face subspace can be used to compensate for the lost details. The blurred image is decomposed into the eigen-face subspace and then restored with a regularized total constrained least square method. With Generalized cross-validation, a cost function is deduced to include two unknown parameters: the regularization factor and one parameter relevant to point spread function. It is shown that, in minimizing the cost function, the cost function dependence of any one unknown parameter can be separated from the other one, which means the cost function can be considered roughly, depending on single variable in an iterative algorithm. With realistic constraints on the regularized factor, a global minimum for the cost function is achieved to determine the unknown parameters. Experiments are presented to demonstrate the effectiveness and robustness of the new method.

[1]  Nikolas P. Galatsanos,et al.  Regularized constrained total least-squares image restoration , 1994, Other Conferences.

[2]  Gene H. Golub,et al.  Generalized cross-validation as a method for choosing a good ridge parameter , 1979, Milestones in Matrix Computation.

[3]  D S Biggs,et al.  Acceleration of iterative image restoration algorithms. , 1997, Applied optics.

[4]  Wufan Chen,et al.  Adaptively regularized constrained total least-squares image restoration , 2000, IEEE Trans. Image Process..

[5]  B. R. Hunt,et al.  The Application of Constrained Least Squares Estimation to Image Restoration by Digital Computer , 1973, IEEE Transactions on Computers.

[6]  Russell M. Mersereau,et al.  Blur identification by the method of generalized cross-validation , 1992, IEEE Trans. Image Process..

[7]  Deepa Kundur,et al.  Blind Image Deconvolution , 2001 .

[8]  Yves Goussard,et al.  GCV and ML Methods of Determining Parameters in Image Restoration by Regularization: Fast Computation in the Spatial Domain and Experimental Comparison , 1993, J. Vis. Commun. Image Represent..

[9]  Reginald L. Lagendijk,et al.  Identification and restoration of noisy blurred images using the expectation-maximization algorithm , 1990, IEEE Trans. Acoust. Speech Signal Process..

[10]  Deepa Kundur,et al.  A novel blind deconvolution scheme for image restoration using recursive filtering , 1998, IEEE Trans. Signal Process..

[11]  D. M. Titterington,et al.  A Study of Methods of Choosing the Smoothing Parameter in Image Restoration by Regularization , 1991, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[12]  Nikolas P. Galatsanos,et al.  Methods for choosing the regularization parameter and estimating the noise variance in image restoration and their relation , 1992, IEEE Trans. Image Process..

[13]  M. Turk,et al.  Eigenfaces for Recognition , 1991, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[14]  Peyman Milanfar,et al.  A computationally efficient superresolution image reconstruction algorithm , 2001, IEEE Trans. Image Process..

[15]  A. Murat Tekalp,et al.  Blur identification using the bispectrum , 1991, IEEE Trans. Signal Process..

[16]  Aggelos K. Katsaggelos,et al.  Maximum likelihood blur identification and image restoration using the EM algorithm , 1991, IEEE Trans. Signal Process..

[17]  Peyman Milanfar,et al.  Efficient generalized cross-validation with applications to parametric image restoration and resolution enhancement , 2001, IEEE Trans. Image Process..

[18]  B. C. McCallum Blind deconvolution by simulated annealing , 1990 .