Analysis of Irish third‐level college applications data

Summary.  The Irish college admissions system involves prospective students listing up to 10 courses in order of preference on their application. Places in third‐level educational institutions are subsequently offered to the applicants on the basis of both their preferences and their final second‐level examination results. The college applications system is a large area of public debate in Ireland. Detractors suggest that the process creates artificial demand for ‘high profile’ courses, causing applicants to ignore their vocational callings. Supporters argue that the system is impartial and transparent. The Irish college degree applications data from the year 2000 are analysed by using mixture models based on ranked data models to investigate the types of application behaviour that are exhibited by college applicants. The results of this analysis show that applicants form groups according to both the discipline and the geographical location of their course choices. In addition, there is evidence of the suggested ‘points race’ for high profile courses. Finally, gender emerges as an influential factor when studying course choice behaviour.

[1]  O. William.  Journal Of The American Statistical Association V-28 , 1932 .

[2]  R. Plackett.  The Analysis of Permutations , 1975 .

[3]  D. Rubin,et al.  Maximum likelihood from incomplete data via the EM - algorithm plus discussions on the paper , 1977 .

[4]  G. Schwarz.  Estimating the Dimension of a Model , 1978 .

[5]  Murray Aitkin,et al.  Statistical Modelling of Data on Teaching Styles , 1981 .

[6]  D. Critchlow.  Metric Methods for Analyzing Partially Ranked Data , 1986 .

[7]  A. F. Smith,et al.  Statistical analysis of finite mixture distributions , 1986 .

[8]  P. Diaconis.  Group representations in probability and statistics , 1988 .

[9]  B. Leroux.  Consistent estimation of a mixing distribution , 1992 .

[10]  A. Raftery,et al.  Model-based Gaussian and non-Gaussian clustering , 1993 .

[11]  J. Marden.  Analyzing and Modeling Rank Data , 1996 .

[12]  L. Wasserman,et al.  Computing Bayes Factors by Combining Simulation and Asymptotic Approximations , 1997 .

[13]  Adrian E. Raftery,et al.  Inference in model-based cluster analysis , 1997, Stat. Comput..

[14]  Adrian E. Raftery,et al.  How Many Clusters? Which Clustering Method? Answers Via Model-Based Cluster Analysis , 1998, Comput. J..

[15]  Christine Keribiin,et al.  Estimation consistante de l'ordre de modèles de mélange , 1998 .

[16]  Mark Murphy,et al.  Points and Performance in Higher Education: A Study of the Predictive Validity of the Points System , 1999 .

[17]  Xiao-Li Meng,et al.  [Optimization Transfer Using Surrogate Objective Functions]: Discussion , 2000 .

[18]  D. Hunter,et al.  Optimization Transfer Using Surrogate Objective Functions , 2000 .

[19]  Geoffrey J. McLachlan,et al.  Finite Mixture Models , 2019, Annual Review of Statistics and Its Application.

[20]  Patrick Clancy,et al.  College entry in focus: a fourth national survey of access to higher education. , 2001 .

[21]  Adrian E. Raftery,et al.  Model-Based Clustering, Discriminant Analysis, and Density Estimation , 2002 .

[22]  D. Hunter.  MM algorithms for generalized Bradley-Terry models , 2003 .

[23]  Thomas Brendan Murphy,et al.  Mixtures of distance-based models for ranking data , 2003, Comput. Stat. Data Anal..

[24]  Kenneth E. Train,et al.  Discrete Choice Methods with Simulation , 2016 .

[25]  D. Hunter,et al.  A Tutorial on MM Algorithms , 2004 .

[26]  Tony O’Hagan.  Bayes factors , 2006 .

[27]  P. Deb.  Finite Mixture Models , 2008 .