An adaptive robust optimization scheme for water-flooding optimization in oil reservoirs using residual analysis

Model-based dynamic optimization of the water-flooding process in oil reservoirs is a computationally complex problem and suffers from high levels of uncertainty. A traditional way of quantifying uncertainty in robust water-flooding optimization is by considering an ensemble of uncertain model realizations. These models are generally not validated with data and the resulting robust optimization strategies are mostly offline or open-loop. The main focus of this work is to develop an adaptive or online robust optimization scheme using residual analysis as a major ingredient. The models in an ensemble are confronted with data and an adapted ensemble is formed with only those models that are not invalidated. As a next step, the robust optimization is again performed (i.e., updated/adjusted) with this adapted ensemble. The adapted ensemble gives a less conservative description of uncertainty and also reduces the high computational cost involved in robust optimization. Simulation example shows that an increase in the objective function value with a reduction of uncertainty on these values is obtained with the developed adaptive robust scheme compared to an open-loop offline robust strategy with the full ensemble and an adaptive scheme using Ensemble Kalman Filter (EnKF), which is one of the most common parameter estimation methods in reservoir simulations.

[1]  D. Oliver,et al.  Recent progress on reservoir history matching: a review , 2011 .

[2]  Bjarne A. Foss,et al.  A Mean-Variance Objective for Robust Production Optimization in Uncertain Geological Scenarios , 2015 .

[3]  Jiang Xie,et al.  Selecting Representative Models From a Large Set of Models , 2013, ANSS 2013.

[4]  Jan Dirk Jansen,et al.  Dynamic Optimization of Waterflooding With Smart Wells Using Optimal Control Theory , 2004 .

[5]  Lennart Ljung,et al.  System Identification: Theory for the User , 1987 .

[6]  G. Mariéthoz,et al.  Multiple-point Geostatistics: Stochastic Modeling with Training Images , 2014 .

[7]  J. Jansen,et al.  Closed-loop reservoir management , 2005 .

[8]  Gijs van Essen,et al.  Robust Waterflooding Optimization of Multiple Geological Scenarios , 2006 .

[9]  Paul M.J. Van den Hof,et al.  Model-based control of multiphase flow in subsurface oil reservoirs , 2008 .

[10]  Bjarne A. Foss,et al.  Process control in conventional oil and gas fields—Challenges and opportunities , 2012 .

[11]  Dongxiao Zhang,et al.  Efficient Ensemble-Based Closed-Loop Production Optimization , 2009 .

[12]  Dean S. Oliver,et al.  Ensemble-Based Closed-Loop Optimization Applied to Brugge Field , 2010 .

[13]  Stein Krogstad,et al.  Open-source MATLAB implementation of consistent discretisations on complex grids , 2012, Computational Geosciences.

[14]  Jef Caers,et al.  Modeling Uncertainty in the Earth Sciences , 2011 .

[15]  van den Pmj Paul Hof,et al.  The egg model – a geological ensemble for reservoir simulation , 2014 .

[16]  Jan Dirk Jansen,et al.  Risk management in oil reservoir water-flooding under economic uncertainty , 2015, 2015 54th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control (CDC).

[17]  John Bagterp Jørgensen,et al.  Waterflooding optimization in uncertain geological scenarios , 2013, Computational Geosciences.

[18]  A. Tarantola Popper, Bayes and the inverse problem , 2006 .

[19]  G. Evensen Data Assimilation: The Ensemble Kalman Filter , 2006 .

[20]  Louis J. Durlofsky,et al.  Efficient Closed-Loop Production Optimization under Uncertainty (SPE94241) , 2005 .

[21]  Arnold Heemink,et al.  Model-based optimization and control of subsurface flow in oil reservoirs , 2013, Proceedings of the 32nd Chinese Control Conference.

[22]  Dean S. Oliver,et al.  THE ENSEMBLE KALMAN FILTER IN RESERVOIR ENGINEERING-A REVIEW , 2009 .

[23]  D. Bertsimas,et al.  Robust and Data-Driven Optimization: Modern Decision-Making Under Uncertainty , 2006 .