The principle of mutual recognition - A source of divergence ?

Governments set numerous norms to protect consumers. Two countries may achieve the same level of protection of their consumers through different specifications. The adaptation costs induced by these differences create barriers to trade. The principle of mutual recognition addresses the problem by ensuring that products lawfully manufactured in one country are acceptable without adaptation in another country. We show that by shifting the transaction costs of adapting to several norms from firms to consumers the principle of mutual recognition creates disparities across countries and is (more) beneficial to larger countries.

[1]  A. Dixit,et al.  Monopolistic competition and optimum product diversity , 1977 .

[2]  Reinhard Selten,et al.  The Distribution of Foreign Language Skills as a Game Equilibrium , 1991 .

[3]  Jeffrey Church,et al.  Bilingualism and Network Externalities , 1993 .

[4]  Anthony J. Venables,et al.  Equilibrium Locations of Vertically Linked Industries , 1996 .

[5]  Christian Gourieroux,et al.  Simulation-based econometric methods , 1996 .

[6]  R. Fischer,et al.  Standards and Protection , 1998 .

[7]  A. Venables,et al.  The Spatial Economy: Cities, Regions, and International Trade , 1999 .

[8]  Richard E. Baldwin,et al.  Regulatory Protectionism, Developing Nations, and a Two-Tier World Trade System , 2000 .

[9]  J. Huriot,et al.  Economics of Cities , 2000 .

[10]  A. Venables,et al.  The Spatial Economy: Cities, Regions, and International Trade , 2000 .

[11]  M. Vancauteren,et al.  Technical Barriers to Trade in the European Union: Importance for Accession Countries , 2001 .

[12]  Neil Gandal,et al.  Standardization Policy and International Trade , 2001 .

[13]  James Renegar,et al.  A mathematical view of interior-point methods in convex optimization , 2001, MPS-SIAM series on optimization.

[14]  Reciprocity and the Political Economy of Harmonization and Mutual Recognition of Regulatory Measures , 2002 .

[15]  Daniel Bienstock,et al.  Potential Function Methods for Approximately Solving Linear Programming Problems: Theory and Practice , 2002 .

[16]  The impact of mutual recognition--inbuilt limits and domestic responses to the single market , 2002 .

[17]  Jacques-François Thisse,et al.  Economics of Agglomeration: Cities, Industrial Location, and Regional Growth , 2002 .

[18]  MUTUAL RECOGNITION IN GOODS AND SERVICES , 2003 .

[19]  Rikard Forslid,et al.  Economic Geography and Public Policy , 2011 .

[20]  R. Amir Supermodularity and Complementarity in Economics: An Elementary Survey , 2003 .

[21]  J. Pelkmans Mutual Recognition in Goods and Services: An Economic Perspective. ENEPRI Working Paper No. 16, March 2003 , 2003 .

[22]  A. Mattoo,et al.  Regionalism in Standards: Good or Bad for Trade? , 2004 .

[23]  J. Gabszewicz La différenciation des produits , 2006 .

[24]  D. Peeters,et al.  Residential equilibrium in a multifractal metropolitan area , 2010 .

[25]  S. Schmidt,et al.  Mutual recognition ‘on trial’: the long road to services liberalization , 2007 .

[26]  Laurence A. Wolsey,et al.  Integration of AI and OR Techniques in Constraint Programming for Combinatorial Optimization Problems, 4th International Conference, CPAIOR 2007, Brussels, Belgium, May 23-26, 2007, Proceedings , 2007, CPAIOR.

[27]  S. Baller,et al.  Trade Effects of Regional Standards Liberalization: A Heterogeneous Firms Approach , 2007 .

[28]  W. Pohlmeier,et al.  High frequency financial econometrics : recent developments , 2007 .

[29]  Arnaud Costinot A comparative institutional analysis of agreements on product standards , 2008 .

[30]  Nicolas Boccard,et al.  Regulating Quality by Regulating Quantity: A Case against Minimum Quality Standards , 2008 .

[31]  Jacques-François Thisse,et al.  Economic Geography: The Integration of Regions and Nations , 2008 .

[32]  Shlomo Weber,et al.  Bilingualism and Communicative Benefits , 2008 .

[33]  Economic benefits of an Integrated European Market for Services , 2008 .

[34]  R. Luttens,et al.  Starting an R&D Project Under Uncertainty , 2009 .

[35]  Mikhail M. Klimenko,et al.  Policies and international trade agreements on technical compatibility for industries with network externalities , 2009 .

[36]  J. Rombouts,et al.  Nonparametric Copula-Based Test for Conditional Independence with Applications to Granger Causality , 2012 .

[37]  J. Gabszewicz A note on price competition in product differentiation models , 2009 .

[38]  A. Mauleon,et al.  Strongly rational sets for normal-form games , 2009 .

[39]  Alain Pholo Bala Urban concentration and economic growth: checking for specific regional effects , 2009 .

[40]  Y. Smeers,et al.  Multi-assets real options , 2009 .

[41]  K. Behrens,et al.  Transfer pricing rules, OECD guidelines, and market distortions , 2009 .

[42]  Olivier Bos,et al.  All-Pay Auctions with Endogenous Rewards , 2009 .

[43]  S. Zanaj Product differentiation and vertical integration in presence of double marginalization , 2009 .

[44]  Henry Tulkens,et al.  'Mitigation, Adaptation, Suffering': In Search of the Right Mix in the Face of Climate Change , 2009, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[45]  Claire Dujardin,et al.  Neighbourhood effects and endogeneity issues , 2009 .

[46]  Pierre Picard,et al.  On spatial equilibria in a social interaction model , 2011, J. Econ. Theory.

[47]  Laurence Jacquet,et al.  A Comparison of Optimal Tax Policies When Compensation or Responsibility Matter , 2009, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[48]  M. Marinucci Endogenous Network Formation in Patent Contests and its Role as a Barrier to Entry , 2009 .

[49]  Luc Bauwens,et al.  On Marginal Likelihood Computation in Change-Point Models , 2012, Comput. Stat. Data Anal..