Modulation of ipsilateral motor cortex in man during unimanual finger movements of different complexities

To understand the role of the ipsilateral motor cortex in the control of unimanual movements, we evaluated changes in cortical motor evoked potentials (MEP) from the left abductor pollici brevis (APB) to transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) of the right hemisphere in nine normal subjects during execution of right finger movements of different complexities. The motor tasks were (a) repetitive opposition movement (thumb tapping the 3rd finger); (b) isolated finger movements in a 'usual' sequence (thumb tapping fingers 2, 3, 4 and 5) and (c) in an 'unusual' sequence (thumb tapping fingers 3, 5, 2 and 4). Subjects were trained before the study up to disappearance of EMG synkinetic activity in the left APB. As compared to the rest condition, MEP amplitude was enhanced in all subjects during paradigm (b) and even more during (c), but remained unchanged during paradigm (a). The MEP increase disappeared in four out of the nine subjects undergoing overtraining. No significant modifications in MEP amplitude were found in the left proximal muscle (biceps, five subjects). The H reflex induced by left median nerve stimulation at the elbow (four subjects) and MEPs from the left APB to transcranial electrical stimulation (three subjects) were not significantly affected by any of the motor paradigms, indicating that the motor cortex was the site of change. These results provide evidence of an increased excitability of cortical motor outputs targeting the unmoving hand muscles during contralateral sequential finger movements which disappears with overtraining. We conclude that during motor learning there is an interhemispheric transfer of information, possibly in order to inhibit the opposite hemisphere from interfering when a fine unimanual movement is required.

[1]  A. P. Georgopoulos,et al.  Functional magnetic resonance imaging of motor cortex: hemispheric asymmetry and handedness. , 1993, Science.

[2]  M. Hallett,et al.  Complexity affects regional cerebral blood flow change during sequential finger movements , 1996, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[3]  B. Day,et al.  Interhemispheric inhibition of the human motor cortex. , 1992, The Journal of physiology.

[4]  C. Brinkman,et al.  Supplementary motor area in the monkey: activity of neurons during performance of a learned motor task. , 1979, Journal of neurophysiology.

[5]  J. Tanji,et al.  Neuronal activity in cortical motor areas related to ipsilateral, contralateral, and bilateral digit movements of the monkey. , 1988, Journal of neurophysiology.

[6]  B. Day,et al.  Stimulation of the human motor cortex through the scalp , 1991, Experimental physiology.

[7]  G. Schott,et al.  Obligatory bimanual associated movements Report of a non-familial case in an otherwise normal left-handed boy , 1977, Journal of the Neurological Sciences.

[8]  H. Asanuma,et al.  Effects of transcallosal volleys on pyramidal tract cell activity of cat. , 1962, Journal of neurophysiology.

[9]  Brian L. Day,et al.  Different sites of action of electrical and magnetic stimulation of the human brain , 1987, Neuroscience Letters.

[10]  P. Rossini,et al.  Central motor tract propagation in man: studies with non-invasive, unifocal, scalp stimulation , 1987, Brain Research.

[11]  G. Geffen,et al.  Interhemispheric control of manual motor activity , 1994, Behavioural Brain Research.

[12]  B. Meyer,et al.  Inhibitory and excitatory interhemispheric transfers between motor cortical areas in normal humans and patients with abnormalities of the corpus callosum. , 1995, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[13]  H C Hopf,et al.  Irradiation of voluntary activity to the contralateral side in movements of normal subjects and patients with central motor disturbances. , 1974, European neurology.

[14]  J. Binder,et al.  Functional magnetic resonance imaging of complex human movements , 1993, Neurology.

[15]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Functional anatomy of human procedural learning determined with regional cerebral blood flow and PET , 1992, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[16]  Jordan Grafman,et al.  Handbook of Neuropsychology , 1991 .

[17]  M. Honda,et al.  Both primary motor cortex and supplementary motor area play an important role in complex finger movement. , 1993, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[18]  C. Brinkman Supplementary motor area of the monkey's cerebral cortex: short- and long-term deficits after unilateral ablation and the effects of subsequent callosal section , 1984, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[19]  Commissurotomy studies in animals , 1990 .

[20]  M Hallett,et al.  Event-related desynchronization (ERD) in the alpha frequency during development of implicit and explicit learning. , 1997, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.