Dosimetric Models : Empirical Pharmacokinetics INHALATION REFERENCE DOSE ( RfDi): AN APPLICATION OF INTERSPECIES DOSIMETRY MODELING FOR RISK ASSESSMENT OF INSOLUBLE PARTICLES

Accurate extrapolation of animal toxicity data for human health risk assessment requires determination of the effective dose to the target tissue and the sensitivity of the target tissue to that dose. The methodology for deriving reference doses [the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) benchmark values for gauging systemic toxicity] for oral exposures has not included dosimetry modeling. Dosimetry data facilitate evaluation of concentration-response data with respect to the dose-response relationships used in quantitative risk assessment. Extension of this methodology to derivation of inhalation reference doses (RfDi) should account for the dynamics of the respiratory system as the portal of entry. Predictive physiologically based modeling of the inhalation of reactive gases has recently been demonstrated (Overton and Miller 1988). Models that describe the deposition of hygroscopic particles and account for chemical factors that affect clearance mechanisms and gas uptake are under development. This paper presents a method for calculating a dosimetric adjustment factor based on the values for the initial deposited dose of insoluble particles in an animal species and in humans. The ratio of these two values serves as a scaling factor that can be applied in the R f D methodology to account for the dosimetric differences in the inhaled deposited dose. This application for insoluble particles illustrates the feasibility of interspecies dosimetry calculations for extrapolating the toxicological results of inhaled agents to human exposure conditions for more accurate risk estimation.

[1]  M. A. Al-Bayati,et al.  Regional Deposition of Inhaled Monodisperse Coarse and Fine Aerosol Particles in Small Laboratory Animals , 1988 .

[2]  F. J. Miller,et al.  A model of the regional uptake of gaseous pollutants in the lung. II. The sensitivity of ozone uptake in laboratory animal lungs to anatomical and ventilatory parameters. , 1987, Toxicology and applied pharmacology.

[3]  F. J. Miller,et al.  Dosimetry and species sensitivity: Key factors in hazard evaluation using animal exposure data , 1986 .

[4]  J. A. Graham,et al.  Inhalation studies of Mt. St. Helens volcanic ash in animals. I. Introduction and exposure system. , 1985, Environmental research.

[5]  R. Schlesinger,et al.  Comparative deposition of inhaled aerosols in experimental animals and humans: a review. , 1985, Journal of toxicology and environmental health.

[6]  M L Dourson,et al.  Regulatory history and experimental support of uncertainty (safety) factors. , 1983, Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology : RTP.

[7]  F. J. Miller,et al.  General Considerations for Developing Pulmonary Extrapolation Models , 1983 .

[8]  O. Raabe,et al.  Anatomy of the nasal‐pharyngeal airway of experimental animals , 1981, The Anatomical record.

[9]  R. Shephard,et al.  Oronasal distribution of respiratory airflow. , 1981, Respiration physiology.

[10]  H C Yeh,et al.  Anatomic Models of the tracheobronchial and pulmonary regions of the rat , 1979, The Anatomical record.

[11]  Otto G. Raabe,et al.  Aerosol Aerodynamic Size Conventions For Inertia! Sampler Calibration , 1976 .

[12]  M Paiva,et al.  Gas transport in the human lung. , 1972, Journal of applied physiology.

[13]  C. Carrington,et al.  Morphometry of the Human Lung , 1965, The Yale Journal of Biology and Medicine.