Assessing forest productivity at local scales across a native eucalypt forest using a process model, 3PG-SPATIAL

To assess the appropriateness of a simplified process model to predict forest growth over a diverse area of forest, we used a geographic information system (GIS) implementation of the 3-PG model (3PG-SPATIAL) with spatial layers of climate and soils to predict forest growth and compare it with existing plot-based data. The study was undertaken across 50,000 ha of eucalypt forest within Bago-Maragle State Forest, Australia with stands ranging in age from 16 to 87 years. At the 16 validation plots, the accuracy of the 3PG-SPATIAL predictions varied depending on the forest variable modelled. There was a strong relationship between predicted and measured standing volume (adjusted R2=0.86, p<0.001, , n=22). The relationships between stocking and mean diameter at breast height (DBH) were less (stocking: adjusted R2=0.86, p<0.001, n=22; and mean DBH: adjusted R2=0.59, p<0.001, n=24). Although the independent validation set is small, the results indicate that 3PG-SPATIAL described the spatial variability in native forest growth in the region using relatively simple input data and parameter values based on current physiological knowledge. There is evidence to suggest that it is now possible to provide forest managers with operationally relevant information over large areas using a simplified process model within a GIS environment.

[1]  J. Beaubien,et al.  Linking ecophysiology and forest productivity: An overview of the ECOLEAP project , 1999 .

[2]  M. Raupach,et al.  Maximum conductances for evaporation from global vegetation types , 1995 .

[3]  C. Justice,et al.  Validating MODIS Terrestrial Ecology Products: Linking In Situ and Satellite Measurements , 1999 .

[4]  Richard H. Waring,et al.  Forest Ecosystems: Concepts and Management , 1985 .

[5]  Neil McKenzie,et al.  Integrating forest soils information across scales: spatial prediction of soil properties under Australian forests. , 2000 .

[6]  John C. Gallant,et al.  TAPES-G: a grid-based terrain analysis program for the environmental sciences , 1996 .

[7]  C. D. Keeling,et al.  Global net carbon exchange and intra‐annual atmospheric CO2 concentrations predicted by an ecosystem process model and three‐dimensional atmospheric transport model , 1996 .

[8]  Michael Battaglia,et al.  Modelling Site Productivity of Eucalyptus globulus in Response to Climatic and Site Factors , 1997 .

[9]  A. Specht,et al.  Canopy structure in Eucalyptus-dominated communities in Australia along climatic gradients , 1989 .

[10]  D. Baldocchi,et al.  Below-canopy and soil CO2 fluxes in a ponderosa pine forest , 1999 .

[11]  K. Hibbard,et al.  A Global Terrestrial Monitoring Network Integrating Tower Fluxes, Flask Sampling, Ecosystem Modeling and EOS Satellite Data , 1999 .

[12]  Richard H. Waring,et al.  Environmental Limits on Net Primary Production and Light‐Use Efficiency Across the Oregon Transect , 1994 .

[13]  Alan R. Ek,et al.  Process-based models for forest ecosystem management: current state of the art and challenges for practical implementation. , 2000, Tree physiology.

[14]  N. McKenzie,et al.  Spatial prediction of soil properties using environmental correlation , 1999 .

[15]  Leo Breiman,et al.  Classification and Regression Trees , 1984 .

[16]  R. Waring,et al.  A generalised model of forest productivity using simplified concepts of radiation-use efficiency, carbon balance and partitioning , 1997 .

[17]  K. Rennolls,et al.  Timber Management-A Quantitative Approach. , 1984 .

[18]  Richard H. Waring,et al.  Measurements of gross and net ecosystem productivity and water vapour exchange of a Pinus ponderosa ecosystem, and an evaluation of two generalized models , 2000 .

[19]  M. Williams,et al.  Net primary production of forests: a constant fraction of gross primary production? , 1998, Tree physiology.

[20]  Scott V. Ollinger,et al.  SIMULATING OZONE EFFECTS ON FOREST PRODUCTIVITY: INTERACTIONS AMONG LEAF‐, CANOPY‐, AND STAND‐LEVEL PROCESSES , 1997 .

[21]  Nicholas C. Coops,et al.  Assessing forest productivity in Australia and New Zealand using a physiologically-based model driven with averaged monthly weather data and satellite-derived estimates of canopy photosynthetic capacity , 1998 .

[22]  Richard H. Waring,et al.  A process model analysis of environmental limitations on the growth of Sitka spruce plantations in Great Britain , 2000 .

[23]  S. Running,et al.  Contrasting Climatic Controls on the Estimated Productivity of Global Terrestrial Biomes , 1998, Ecosystems.

[24]  S. Goward,et al.  Global Primary Production: A Remote Sensing Approach , 1995 .

[25]  Joe Landsberg,et al.  Physiological ecology of forest production , 1986 .

[26]  J. H. Smith,et al.  The potential of Weibull-type functions as flexible growth curves , 1978 .

[27]  P. Jarvis.  European Forests and Global Change , 1998 .

[28]  Henry L. Gholz,et al.  Climatic factors controlling the productivity of pine stands: a model-based analysis , 1994 .

[29]  S. Running,et al.  A general model of forest ecosystem processes for regional applications I. Hydrologic balance, canopy gas exchange and primary production processes , 1988 .

[30]  M. Hutchinson.  A new procedure for gridding elevation and stream line data with automatic removal of spurious pits , 1989 .

[31]  A. Arneth,et al.  Net ecosystem productivity, net primary productivity and ecosystem carbon sequestration in a Pinus radiata plantation subject to soil water deficit. , 1998, Tree physiology.

[32]  D. Mummery,et al.  Application of process-based models to forest management: experience with PROMOD, a simple plantation productivity model. , 2000, Tree physiology.