Validation of a job-exposure matrix for assessment of utility worker exposure to magnetic fields.

The aim of this study was to evaluate a 50-Hz electromagnetic field job-exposure matrix used in epidemiological studies of a nationwide cohort of utility workers in Denmark. We compared a job-exposure matrix that distinguished four categories of exposure to 50-Hz time-weighted average (TWA) magnetic fields: low (< 0.1 microT), medium (0.1-0.29 microT), high (0.3-0.99 microT) and very high (> 1.0 microT) of utility company employees with 196 measurements of 8-h exposure for 129 workers in this industry. The 129 workers were selected from the following five main work environments: generation facilities, transmission lines, distribution lines, substations, and other electrically and non-electrically relates jobs. This study shows that the job-exposure matrix can be expected to introduce misclassification mainly between adjacent categories of exposure. Thus, the distribution of measurements of exposure to 50-Hz magnetic fields was similar for workers in the medium and the high exposure matrix categories. But the two extreme categories satisfactorily separate low and very highly exposed workers. The study shows that epidemiological use of this job-exposure matrix might combine the two intermediate categories of exposure. If the sample size in extreme categories provides enough power, a study in which this job-exposure matrix is used should allow detection of a true association between exposure to 50-Hz magnetic field and disease.

[1]  C. Johansen.  Exposure to Electromagnetic Fields and Risk of Central Nervous System Disease in Utility Workers , 2000, Epidemiology.

[2]  C. Johansen,et al.  Multiple sclerosis among utility workers , 1999, Neurology.

[3]  C. Johansen,et al.  Mortality from amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, other chronic disorders, and electric shocks among utility workers. , 1998, American journal of epidemiology.

[4]  C. Johansen,et al.  Risk of cancer among Danish utility workers--a nationwide cohort study. , 1998, American journal of epidemiology.

[5]  Hans Kromhout,et al.  Sensitivity of the Relation between Cumulative Magnetic Field Exposure and Brain Cancer Mortality to Choice of Monitoring Data Grouping Scheme , 1997, Epidemiology.

[6]  G Thériault,et al.  Exposure to 60-Hz magnetic and electric fields at a Canadian electric utility. , 1996, Scandinavian journal of work, environment & health.

[7]  Brackenbury Td,et al.  Variability and consistency of electric and magnetic field occupational exposure measurements. , 1996 .

[8]  B. Floderus.  Is job title an adequate surrogate to measure magnetic field exposure? , 1996, Epidemiology.

[9]  N. Birkett,et al.  Effect of nondifferential misclassification on estimates of odds ratios with multiple levels of exposure. , 1992, American journal of epidemiology.

[10]  Mustafa Dosemeci,et al.  RE: “DOES NONDIFFERENTIAL MISCLASSIFICATION OF EXPOSURE ALWAYS BIAS A TRUE EFFECT TOWARD THE NULL VALUE?” , 1991 .

[11]  R. Priore,et al.  On the distortion of risk estimates in multiple exposure level case-control studies. , 1981, American journal of epidemiology.

[12]  T D Bracken,et al.  Magnetic field exposure among utility workers. , 1995, Bioelectromagnetics.

[13]  D A Savitz,et al.  Correlations among indices of electric and magnetic field exposure in electric utility workers. , 1994, Bioelectromagnetics.

[14]  V Delpizzo,et al.  Misclassification of ELF occupational exposure resulting from spatial variation of the magnetic field. , 1993, Bioelectromagnetics.

[15]  Michael R. Flynn,et al.  Validation of Expert Judgment in Assessing Occupational Exposure to Magnetic Fields in the Utility Industry , 1991 .