Problem complexity and the formulation process in planning and design

The importance of problem formulation in planning and design is well documented: Errors of the Third Kind (solving the wrong problem or a suboptimal problem) produce underdesign and system failure. This paper explores the role of problem statements in the formulation process. Using Ashby's Law of Requisite Variety as a basis, the quantitative and qualitative features of problem statements are linked to the complexity of a problematic situation. Six propositions are offered for future study.

[1]  Lena Linde,et al.  Artificial intelligence. What is domain skill? Frames in information seeking , 1986 .

[2]  Gerald Nadler,et al.  The planning and design approach , 1981 .

[3]  R. Volkema.  Problem formulation as a purposive activity , 1986 .

[4]  Marjorie A. Lyles,et al.  Organizational Problem Formulation: An Empirical Study. , 1980 .

[5]  Henry Mintzberg,et al.  The Structure of "Unstructured" Decision Processes , 1976 .

[6]  Bernard L. Hinton.  A Model for the Study of Creative Problem Solving , 1968 .

[7]  R. Volkema.  Problem Formulation in Planning and Design , 1983 .

[8]  E. Jantsch.  The design of inquiring systems,: by C. West Churchman New York, Basic Books, 1972. , 1972 .

[9]  Paul C. Nutt,et al.  PLANNING PROCESS ARCHETYPES AND THEIR EFFECTIVENESS , 1984 .

[10]  Robert G. Lord,et al.  Scripts as Determinants of Purposeful Behavior in Organizations , 1987 .

[11]  R. Flood.  Complexity: A definition by construction of a conceptual framework , 1987 .

[12]  George J. Klir,et al.  Architecture of Systems Problem Solving , 1985, Springer US.

[13]  Ian I. Mitroff,et al.  A Program for Research on Management Information Systems , 1973 .

[14]  R. L. Keeney,et al.  Decisions with Multiple Objectives: Preferences and Value Trade-Offs , 1977, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics.

[15]  Arkalgud Ramaprasad,et al.  On formulating strategic problems , 1984 .

[16]  R. Abelson.  Psychological status of the script concept. , 1981 .

[17]  Stuart L. Hart,et al.  Decision techniques and social research: A contingency framework for problem solving * , 1985 .

[18]  Surya B. Yadav,et al.  Management of Type III Error in Problem Identification , 1985 .

[19]  Herbert A. Simon,et al.  The Structure of Ill Structured Problems , 1973, Artif. Intell..

[20]  Paul C. Nutt,et al.  Decision style and strategic decisions of top executives , 1986 .

[21]  John N. Warfield,et al.  SOCIETAL SYSTEMS Planning, Policy and Complexity , 1978 .

[22]  A. Einstein,et al.  The Evolution of Physics , 1938 .

[23]  D. A. Cowan.  Developing a Process Model of Problem Recognition , 1986 .

[24]  P. C. Nutt.  Types of organizational decision processes. , 1984, Administrative science quarterly.

[25]  G. A. Miller.  THE PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW THE MAGICAL NUMBER SEVEN, PLUS OR MINUS TWO: SOME LIMITS ON OUR CAPACITY FOR PROCESSING INFORMATION 1 , 1956 .

[26]  Harvey J. Brightman.  Problem Solving: A Logical and Creative Approach , 1980 .

[27]  Marjorie A. Lyles.  Formulating strategic problems: Empirical analysis and model development , 1981 .

[28]  Neil McK. Agnew,et al.  Bounded rationality: Fallible decisions in unbounded decision space , 1986 .

[29]  H. Simon,et al.  Information Processing Models of Cognition , 1979 .

[30]  A. Tversky,et al.  Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases , 1974, Science.