‘What Ideality Tool’ (WIT) for Product Design Briefs

This paper discusses the relationship between the ‘WHAT’ and ‘HOW’ concepts in the design process through the innovative ‘What Ideality Tool’ (‘WIT’). The abstract tool draws on nature ideality principles, crossing from the traditional static flowchart model to a dynamic automation tool, promoting design procedures by focusing on the ‘WHAT’ as a creative engine, instead of skipping ahead to the ‘HOW’. Many product designers rush into a design solution without thorough analysis of a product’s intended purpose. Applying ‘WIT’ in the ideation stage to create the designer brief serves as a preemptive tool for handling cognitive obstacles; this results in the paradox wherein the more experienced a designer is, the less flexible the design approach becomes. Hence, their range of ideas essentially becomes their ‘fixed design style’. The ‘WIT’ approach enriches designers’ mindset abilities, expanding the creativity flow by exposing distant connections, and promoting sustainable attributes necessary in today’s market.

[1]  Jahau Lewis Chen,et al.  Eco-Innovation by Integrating Biomimetic with TRIZ Ideality and Evolution Rules , 2011 .

[2]  Yoram Reich,et al.  Sustainability Strategies In Nature , 2014 .

[3]  David W. Rosen,et al.  The effects of biological examples in idea generation , 2010 .

[4]  Willemien Visser,et al.  The Cognitive Artifacts of Designing , 2006 .

[5]  Ashok K. Goel,et al.  DANE: Fostering Creativity in and through Biologically Inspired Design , 2011 .

[6]  Robert L. Nagel,et al.  Function-based, biologically inspired concept generation , 2010, Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing.

[7]  Daniel A. McAdams,et al.  Evaluating Methods for Bioinspired Concept Generation , 2014 .

[8]  N. F. M. Roozenburg,et al.  Product design: Fundamentals and methods , 1996 .

[9]  J. Vincent,et al.  Biomimetics: its practice and theory , 2006, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[10]  David G. Ullman,et al.  The Mechanical Design Process , 1992 .

[11]  Janine M. Benyus,et al.  Biomimicry: Innovation Inspired by Nature , 1997 .

[12]  G. S. Alʹtshuller,et al.  The Innovation Algorithm:TRIZ, systematic innovation and technical creativity , 1999 .

[13]  Amarendra Kumar Das,et al.  THE IDEALITY "WHAT" MODEL FOR PRODUCT DESIGN , 2015 .

[14]  Marine Agogué,et al.  The impact of age and training on creativity: A design-theory approach to study fixation effects , 2014 .

[15]  Yoram Reich,et al.  INTRODUCTION OF THE IDEALITY TOOL FOR SUSTAINABLE DESIGN , 2015 .

[16]  K. Dunbar The analogical paradox: Why analogy is so easy in naturalistic settings yet so difficult in the psychological laboratory. , 2001 .