This study evaluated a program arising from the Commonwealth policy of regionalised training for general practice with regard to the outcomes for the region investing in the training program. A complete operational audit was performed of the outcomes of a training provider of the Commonwealth program, evaluating workforce contribution and retention in the region during and after training, stratified for the effects of locally contextualising, advanced skill training and origin of trainee. The local regional workforce contribution during training peaked at 130 full-time equivalents in 2015. Cumulatively, 53% of alumni remained in the region, but over 40% moved to practice in metropolitan south-east Queensland and other Australian capital cities. Local contextualising of training, completing additional advanced skills training and being an Australian graduate were associated with increased retention in the region. A regional training program is a significant local asset introducing potential general practitioners (GPs) to the region. However, this regional area has become a 'rural' training ground for GPs into metropolitan practice rather than local investment translating as comprehensively as possible into long-term local workforce. The Commonwealth program should focus on local workforce outcomes as an evaluation metric rather than the proportion of trainees in rural training.What is known about the topic?Retention in regional areas following the Australian General Practice Training (AGPT) program measured on a national basis is greater following regional-based training.What does this paper add?Local workforce return on investment for training providers in GP is substantial. Contextualised local rural training, Australian graduates and trainees completing advanced rural training improve local return on training investment. A significant proportion of this rural local training program investment provides GPs for metropolitan southeast Queensland.What are the implications for practitioners?National and regional investment in the AGPT should recognise that despite the lesser supervisory medical workforce and resources, regional training still supports metropolitan GP workforce development. Australian graduates are more likely to remain in a region following local training, as are those who have additionally completed advanced rural skill training.
[1]
D. Campbell,et al.
Vocational training of general practitioners in rural locations is critical for the Australian rural medical workforce
,
2016,
The Medical journal of Australia.
[2]
I. Couper,et al.
Education for rural practice in rural practice
,
2016,
Education for primary care : an official publication of the Association of Course Organisers, National Association of GP Tutors, World Organisation of Family Doctors.
[3]
T. Gupta,et al.
Training for general practice: How Australia's programs compare to other countries.
,
2016,
Australian family physician.
[4]
M. Robinson,et al.
Choice or chance! The influence of decentralised training on GP retention in the Bogong region of Victoria and New South Wales.
,
2013,
Rural and remote health.
[5]
Stephen Trumble.
The evolution of general practice training in Australia
,
2011,
The Medical journal of Australia.
[6]
D. Campbell,et al.
Regionalisation of general practice training — are we meeting the needs of rural Australia?
,
2011,
The Medical journal of Australia.
[7]
M. Nelson,et al.
PORRIGE - a cohort study of general practice registrars.
,
2011,
Australian family physician.
[8]
S. Wearne,et al.
Where are they now? The career paths of the Remote Vocational Training Scheme registrars.
,
2010,
Australian family physician.