Parent identity and ‘virtual’ children: why patients discard rather than donate unused embryos

BACKGROUND: Many patients prefer to donate unused embryos when surveyed. However, it is a source of frustration and curiosity that clinical audits of embryo outcomes show the majority changed their minds. In many clinics, the number of recipients continues to outweigh the number of donors. To plan effective counselling practices, it is important to understand the dynamics of decision-making for patients when determining outcomes for unused embryos. METHODS: Twelve couples and nine women (n = 33) who had discarded unused embryos were interviewed using a narrative structure and various interview techniques. Interview transcripts underwent qualitative analysis through which data were grouped thematically according to similarities. Differences were also examined. RESULTS: Participants described their initial choice to donate embryos as an idealistic plan rather than a purposeful decision. Their change of mind was due to two factors: (i) a change in their standpoint from a childless couple to parents; and (ii) a change in the symbolism of the embryo from representing a chance to become pregnant to representing a 'virtual' child in cryo-storage. The meaning of embryo donation was likened to child relinquishment. CONCLUSION: Counselling and social policy need to take account of the symbolism of the embryo and reform current practices.

[1]  R. Dickey,et al.  Couples having IVF should be asked their wishes about spare embryos before egg retrieval , 1996, BMJ.

[2]  G. Kovacs,et al.  Embryo donation at an Australian university in‐vitro fertilisation clinic: issues and outcomes , 2003, The Medical journal of Australia.

[3]  M. Kirkman Genetic connection and relationships in narratives of donor-assisted conception , 2004 .

[4]  S Cooper,et al.  The destiny of supernumerary embryos? , 1996, Fertility and sterility.

[5]  D. Jack,et al.  Learning to Listen: Interview Techniques and Analyses , 1991 .

[6]  A. Borini,et al.  Fate of stored embryos: our 10 years experience. , 2004, European journal of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive biology.

[7]  A. Leader,et al.  Research implications of embryo cryopreservation choices made by patients undergoing in vitro fertilization. , 2004, Fertility and sterility.

[8]  F. Maccallum,et al.  Disparities in parenting criteria: an exploration of the issues, focusing on adoption and embryo donation , 2002, Journal of medical ethics.

[9]  Y. Englert,et al.  Psychological study of in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer participants' attitudes toward the destiny of their supernumerary embryos. , 1995, Fertility and sterility.

[10]  A. Pinborg,et al.  Patients' attitudes towards donation of surplus cryopreserved embryos for treatment or research. , 2004, Human reproduction.

[11]  R. Siegberg,et al.  Embryo donation: outcome and attitudes among embryo donors and recipients. , 2001, Human reproduction.

[12]  C. Tennant,et al.  Embryo donation for medical research: attitudes and concerns of potential donors. , 2003, Human reproduction.

[13]  S C Klock,et al.  The disposition of unused frozen embryos. , 2001, The New England journal of medicine.

[14]  J. Morse,et al.  Verification Strategies for Establishing Reliability and Validity in Qualitative Research , 2002 .

[15]  D. Saunders,et al.  Frozen embryos: too cold to touch? The dilemma ten years on. , 1995, Human reproduction.

[16]  J. Boivin,et al.  Factors influencing the decision to use or discard cryopreserved embryos , 2001, Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica.

[17]  R. Chetkowski,et al.  Donation of frozen embryos after in vitro fertilization is uncommon. , 1996, Fertility and sterility.

[18]  N. Fairclough Discourse and social change , 1992 .

[19]  R. Weir,et al.  Establishment of a successful donor embryo program: medical, ethical, and policy issues. , 1999, Fertility and sterility.

[20]  J. Czyba,et al.  Six year follow-up of cryopreserved human embryos. , 1995, Human reproduction.