Cost Effectiveness of 18F-FET PET for Early Treatment Response Assessment in Glioma Patients After Adjuvant Temozolomide Chemotherapy
暂无分享,去创建一个
G. Fink | M. Ruge | G. Stoffels | N. Galldiks | K. Langen | A. Heinzel | C. Kabbasch | R. Goldbrunner | C. Tscherpel | M. Sabel | G. Ceccon | M. Rapp | E. Bauer | Veronika Dunkl | U. Herrlinger | J. Werner | J. Rosen | Niklas Schaefer
[1] G. Fink,et al. FET PET Radiomics for Differentiating Pseudoprogression from Early Tumor Progression in Glioma Patients Post-Chemoradiation , 2020, Cancers.
[2] G. Fink,et al. Early Treatment Response Assessment Using 18F-FET PET Compared with Contrast-Enhanced MRI in Glioma Patients After Adjuvant Temozolomide Chemotherapy , 2020, The Journal of Nuclear Medicine.
[3] I. Goethals,et al. Cost-Effectiveness of [18F] Fluoroethyl-L-Tyrosine for Temozolomide Therapy Assessment in Patients With Glioblastoma , 2019, Front. Oncol..
[4] H. Arefian,et al. Cost-effectiveness of the long-term use of temozolomide for treating newly diagnosed glioblastoma in Germany , 2018, Journal of Neuro-Oncology.
[5] M. Wiesmann,et al. O-(2-18F-fluoroethyl)-L-tyrosine PET for evaluation of brain metastasis recurrence after radiotherapy: an effectiveness and cost-effectiveness analysis , 2017, Neuro-oncology.
[6] Nadim Jon Shah,et al. Advances in neuro-oncology imaging , 2017, Nature Reviews Neurology.
[7] Ian Law,et al. The use of amino acid PET and conventional MRI for monitoring of brain tumor therapy , 2016, NeuroImage: Clinical.
[8] G. Reifenberger,et al. The 2016 World Health Organization Classification of Tumors of the Central Nervous System: a summary , 2016, Acta Neuropathologica.
[9] Gereon R. Fink,et al. Diagnosis of pseudoprogression in patients with glioblastoma using O-(2-[18F]fluoroethyl)-l-tyrosine PET , 2015, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.
[10] F. Mottaghy,et al. The Use of O-(2-18F-Fluoroethyl)-l-Tyrosine PET for Treatment Management of Bevacizumab and Irinotecan in Patients with Recurrent High-Grade Glioma: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis , 2013, The Journal of Nuclear Medicine.
[11] Karl-Josef Langen,et al. Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Amino Acid PET–Guided Surgery for Supratentorial High-Grade Gliomas , 2012, The Journal of Nuclear Medicine.
[12] K. Langen,et al. Cost-effectiveness analysis of FET PET-guided target selection for the diagnosis of gliomas , 2012, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.
[13] W. Shi,et al. Potential utility of conventional MRI signs in diagnosing pseudoprogression in glioblastoma , 2011, Neurology.
[14] P. Wen,et al. Antiangiogenic therapy for patients with glioblastoma: current challenges in imaging and future directions , 2011, Expert review of anticancer therapy.
[15] Heinrich Lanfermann,et al. Advanced MRI and PET imaging for assessment of treatment response in patients with gliomas , 2010, The Lancet Neurology.
[16] Susan M. Chang,et al. Updated response assessment criteria for high-grade gliomas: response assessment in neuro-oncology working group. , 2010, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.
[17] R. Stupp,et al. Cost–effectiveness of temozolomide for the treatment of newly diagnosed glioblastoma multiforme , 2009, Expert review of pharmacoeconomics & outcomes research.
[18] Martin J. van den Bent,et al. Radiotherapy plus concomitant and adjuvant temozolomide for glioblastoma. , 2005, The New England journal of medicine.
[19] Karl-Josef Langen,et al. O-(2-[18F]fluoroethyl)-L-tyrosine PET combined with MRI improves the diagnostic assessment of cerebral gliomas. , 2005, Brain : a journal of neurology.
[20] P Van Tassel,et al. Malignant gliomas: MR imaging spectrum of radiation therapy- and chemotherapy-induced necrosis of the brain after treatment. , 2000, Radiology.