Cost Effectiveness of 18F-FET PET for Early Treatment Response Assessment in Glioma Patients After Adjuvant Temozolomide Chemotherapy

Visual Abstract In light of increasing health-care costs, higher medical expenses should be justified socioeconomically. Therefore, we calculated the effectiveness and cost effectiveness of PET using the radiolabeled amino acid O-(2-18F-fluoroethyl)-l-tyrosine (18F-FET) compared with conventional MRI for early identification of responders to adjuvant temozolomide chemotherapy. A recently published study in isocitrate dehydrogenase wild-type glioma patients suggested that 18F-FET PET parameter changes predicted a significantly longer survival already after 2 cycles whereas MRI changes were not significant. Methods: To determine the effectiveness and cost effectiveness of serial 18F-FET PET imaging, we analyzed published clinical data and calculated the associated costs from the perspective of the German Statutory Health Insurance system. Based on a decision-tree model, the effectiveness of 18F-FET PET and MRI was calculated—that is, the probability to correctly identify a responder as defined by an overall survival of at least 15 mo. To determine the cost effectiveness, the incremental cost effectiveness ratio (ICER) was calculated—that is, the cost for each additionally identified responder by 18F-FET PET who would have remained undetected by MRI. The robustness of the results was tested by deterministic and probabilistic Monte Carlo sensitivity analyses. Results: Compared with MRI, 18F-FET PET increased the rate of correctly identified responders to chemotherapy by 26%; thus, 4 patients needed to be examined by 18F-FET PET to identify 1 additional responder. Considering the respective costs for serial 18F-FET PET and MRI, the ICER resulted in €4,396.83 for each additional correctly identified responder by 18F-FET PET. Sensitivity analyses confirmed the robustness of the results. Conclusion: In contrast to conventional MRI, the model suggests that 18F-FET PET is cost-effective in terms of ICER values. Considering the high cost of temozolomide, the integration of 18F-FET PET has the potential to avoid premature chemotherapy discontinuation at reasonable cost.

[1]  G. Fink,et al.  FET PET Radiomics for Differentiating Pseudoprogression from Early Tumor Progression in Glioma Patients Post-Chemoradiation , 2020, Cancers.

[2]  G. Fink,et al.  Early Treatment Response Assessment Using 18F-FET PET Compared with Contrast-Enhanced MRI in Glioma Patients After Adjuvant Temozolomide Chemotherapy , 2020, The Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[3]  I. Goethals,et al.  Cost-Effectiveness of [18F] Fluoroethyl-L-Tyrosine for Temozolomide Therapy Assessment in Patients With Glioblastoma , 2019, Front. Oncol..

[4]  H. Arefian,et al.  Cost-effectiveness of the long-term use of temozolomide for treating newly diagnosed glioblastoma in Germany , 2018, Journal of Neuro-Oncology.

[5]  M. Wiesmann,et al.  O-(2-18F-fluoroethyl)-L-tyrosine PET for evaluation of brain metastasis recurrence after radiotherapy: an effectiveness and cost-effectiveness analysis , 2017, Neuro-oncology.

[6]  Nadim Jon Shah,et al.  Advances in neuro-oncology imaging , 2017, Nature Reviews Neurology.

[7]  Ian Law,et al.  The use of amino acid PET and conventional MRI for monitoring of brain tumor therapy , 2016, NeuroImage: Clinical.

[8]  G. Reifenberger,et al.  The 2016 World Health Organization Classification of Tumors of the Central Nervous System: a summary , 2016, Acta Neuropathologica.

[9]  Gereon R. Fink,et al.  Diagnosis of pseudoprogression in patients with glioblastoma using O-(2-[18F]fluoroethyl)-l-tyrosine PET , 2015, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[10]  F. Mottaghy,et al.  The Use of O-(2-18F-Fluoroethyl)-l-Tyrosine PET for Treatment Management of Bevacizumab and Irinotecan in Patients with Recurrent High-Grade Glioma: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis , 2013, The Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[11]  Karl-Josef Langen,et al.  Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Amino Acid PET–Guided Surgery for Supratentorial High-Grade Gliomas , 2012, The Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[12]  K. Langen,et al.  Cost-effectiveness analysis of FET PET-guided target selection for the diagnosis of gliomas , 2012, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[13]  W. Shi,et al.  Potential utility of conventional MRI signs in diagnosing pseudoprogression in glioblastoma , 2011, Neurology.

[14]  P. Wen,et al.  Antiangiogenic therapy for patients with glioblastoma: current challenges in imaging and future directions , 2011, Expert review of anticancer therapy.

[15]  Heinrich Lanfermann,et al.  Advanced MRI and PET imaging for assessment of treatment response in patients with gliomas , 2010, The Lancet Neurology.

[16]  Susan M. Chang,et al.  Updated response assessment criteria for high-grade gliomas: response assessment in neuro-oncology working group. , 2010, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[17]  R. Stupp,et al.  Cost–effectiveness of temozolomide for the treatment of newly diagnosed glioblastoma multiforme , 2009, Expert review of pharmacoeconomics & outcomes research.

[18]  Martin J. van den Bent,et al.  Radiotherapy plus concomitant and adjuvant temozolomide for glioblastoma. , 2005, The New England journal of medicine.

[19]  Karl-Josef Langen,et al.  O-(2-[18F]fluoroethyl)-L-tyrosine PET combined with MRI improves the diagnostic assessment of cerebral gliomas. , 2005, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[20]  P Van Tassel,et al.  Malignant gliomas: MR imaging spectrum of radiation therapy- and chemotherapy-induced necrosis of the brain after treatment. , 2000, Radiology.