Implications of a Multidisciplinary Students' Computer Game Design Project

In the current globalized economy, human resources needs of both the industry and society are much focused on an individual’s multidisciplinary competency. This is to say that, employers look for people that can perform and work positively with people of various background disciplines. To test whether students are ready for such, this case study summarizes the findings of a year-long multidisciplinary computer game design project between the Multi-media Game Science (MGS) and the Applied Foreign Languages (AFL) departments’ students of a science and technology university in Taiwan. A total of 10 (3 - AFL and 7 - MGS) local students and 3 Dutch MGS students participated in the study. Qualitative focus group interviews, students’ reflection, and researcher’s observations logs were gathered in the yearlong study. Data analysis includes the generation of meaning from reoccurring themes from the interviews and logs. Results indicate that AFL students improved on various English language communication and other employability skills needed in the industry. In addition, results also show that for a multidisciplinary computer game design project to become successful the school administration should provide clear guidelines and conduct periodic dialogues with student participants to clear up issues and avoid misunderstanding. Lastly, other implications and recommendations are provided for future practitioners and researchers in the same field of inquiry.

[1]  Robert M. Gonyea,et al.  Unmasking the Effects of Student Engagement on First-Year College Grades and Persistence , 2008 .

[2]  Valerie Wilson,et al.  Multidisciplinary Teamworking Indicators of Good Practice. SCRE Spotlights 77. , 2000 .

[3]  Enhancing college students’ global awareness through campus Toastmasters clubs , 2011 .

[4]  A. Chickering,et al.  Seven Principles for Good Practice in Undergraduate Education , 1987, CORE.

[5]  Michael J. Prince,et al.  Does Active Learning Work? A Review of the Research , 2004 .

[6]  Valerie Wilson,et al.  Multidisciplinary Teamworking: Beyond the Barriers? A Review of the Issues. Research Report Series. , 2000 .

[7]  D. Kolb.  Experiential Learning: Experience as the Source of Learning and Development , 1983 .

[8]  K. Seers.  Qualitative data analysis , 2011, Evidence Based Nursing.

[9]  S. Peterson,et al.  Comparing the Quality of Students' Experiences During Cooperative Learning and Large-Group Instruction , 2004 .

[10]  Sus Lundgren.  Controlled Confusion: Teaching complex multidisciplinary group work , 2008, IxD&A.

[11]  Edythe Johnson Holubec,et al.  Cooperation in the Classroom , 1993 .

[12]  Doug Maskell,et al.  Student‐based Assessment in a Multi‐disciplinary Problem‐based Learning Environment , 1999 .

[13]  Georgina Born,et al.  Logics of interdisciplinarity , 2008 .

[14]  Valerie Wilson,et al.  Multidisciplinary Teamworking Indicators of Good Practice , 2000 .

[15]  J. Morse.  Qualitative data analysis (2nd ed): Mathew B. Miles and A. Michael Huberman. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, 1994. Price: $65.00 hardback, $32.00 paperback. 238 pp , 1996 .

[16]  Beena Sukumaran,et al.  Multidisciplinary Design and Communication: A Pedagogical Vision , 1999 .

[17]  L. Walter.  Research in Education , 1895, Nature.

[18]  Lisa D. Pearce,et al.  Mixed method data collection strategies , 2006 .

[19]  John Dewey,et al.  Democracy in Education , 1903, The Elementary School Teacher.

[20]  B MilesMatthew,et al.  Qualitative Data Analysis , 2009, Approaches and Processes of Social Science Research.

[21]  David W. Johnson,et al.  Reaching out: interpersonal effectiveness and self-actualization , 1972 .

[22]  R. Miettinen,et al.  The concept of experiential learning and John Dewey's theory of reflective thought and action , 2000 .

[23]  George D. Kuh.  The national survey of student engagement: Conceptual and empirical foundations , 2009 .

[24]  Lois W. Sayrs.  Interviews : an introduction to qualitative research interviewing , 1996 .