Fast kinetic studies on the interaction of a fluorescent agonist with the membrane-bound acetylcholine receptor from Torpedo marmorata.

The fluorescent cholinergic effector, [1-(5-dimethylamino naphthalene)sulfonamido] n-hexanoic acid β-(N-trimethylammonium bromide) ethyl ester (Dns-C6-Cho) acts as a potent depolarizing agent or agonist on Electrophorus electricus electroplaque (maximal depolarization 65–70 mV). In vitro, it increases the efflux of 22Na+ from receptor-rich membrane fragments prepared from Torpedo marmorata electric organ. The apparent dissociation constant determined with the two systems is close to 1 μM. Preincubation of the receptor-rich microsacs with Dns-C6-Cho results in a decrease of the amplitude of the permeability response to carbamylcholine. Like the physiological transmitter, acetylcholine, Dns-C6-Cho triggers the two characteristic reactions of ‘activation’ and ‘desensitization’. The equilibrium dissociation constant of Dns-C6-Cho measured by following the decrease of the initial velocity of binding of Naja nigricollisα-[3H]toxin to receptor-rich microsacs is close to 0.01 μM after prolonged incubation. Using the same method, it is found that Dns-C6-Cho triggers, in the range of a few minutes, a time-dependent increased of affinity. The interaction of Dns-C6-Cho with the receptor-rich membranes can be monitored under conditions of energy transfer from proteins (λex= 290 nm) and results in an approximately 10-fold increase of fluorescence intensity at the maximal emission wavelength (λem= 557 nm). Rapid mixing of a suspension of membrane fragments with Dns-C6-Cho gives rise to changes of fluorescence intensity which can be recorded in the time range of seconds to milliseconds. The signals disappear after pre-incubation of the membrane fragments with saturating levels of N. nigricollisα-toxin and therefore are due to the interaction of Dns-C6-Cho with the receptor site. Three major relaxation processes are observed. (a) A ‘rapid’ one, in the millisecond range, is characterized by a linear dependence of its apparent rate constant with Dns-C6-Cho concentration. It is analysed in terms of Dns-C6-Cho binding to receptor sites spontaneously present in a high-affinity state for agonists (Kd∼ 3 nM). These sites represent approximately 20% of the total population of receptor sites and exist prior to agonist binding in the membrane at rest. (b) An ‘intermediate’ relaxation process, in the second–millisecond range, shows a linear dependence of the apparent rate constant with Dns-C6-Cho concentration and is accounted for by a bimolecular binding reaction between Dns-C6-Cho and acetylcholine receptor sites in a state (or states) of lower affinity (∼ 1 μM). (c) Finally, a ‘slow’ relaxation process, in the seconds range, is characterised by an apparent rate of an interconversion between low-affinity and high-affinity states of the receptor. A model with two pre-existing and interconvertible affinity states for the receptor qualitatively and quantitatively accounts for the data, and the corresponding rate constants have been determined; the model also accounts for the complex kinetics monitored upon addition of a non-fluorescent effector to a suspension of receptor-rich membrane fragments equilibrated with Dns-C6-Cho; the possible occurrence of a third state with intermediate affinity is discussed. The slow interconversion from low-affinity to high-affinity states of the receptor is correlated with the physiological process of ‘desensitization’ on the basis of its dependence on agonist concentration and temperature and of the effect of local anesthetics; the features of the intermediate relaxation process and its possible correlation with the ‘activation’ reaction are discussed.

[1]  C. Chignell,et al.  Kinetics of agonist-mediated transitions in state of the cholinergic receptor. , 1977, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[2]  F. Barrantes,et al.  Agonist-mediated changes of the acetylcholine receptor in its membrane environment. , 1978, Journal of molecular biology.

[3]  F. Barrantes Intrinsic fluorescence of the membrane-bound acetylcholine receptor: its quenching by suberyldicholine. , 1976, Biochemical and biophysical research communications.

[4]  A. Eldefrawi,et al.  Purification and molecular properties of the acetylcholine receptor from Torpedo electroplax. , 1973, Archives of biochemistry and biophysics.

[5]  T. Podleski,et al.  APPARENT DISSOCIATION CONSTANTS BETWEEN CARBAMYLCHOLINE, DELTA-TUBOCURARINE AND THE RECEPTOR. , 1963, Biochimica et biophysica acta.

[6]  T. Moody,et al.  Binding of acetylcholine and related compounds to purified acetylcholine receptor from Torpedo Californica electroplax. , 1973, Biochemical and biophysical research communications.

[7]  J P Changeux,et al.  Structural and functional properties of the acetylcholine receptor protein in its purified and membrane-bound states. , 1978, Annual review of biochemistry.

[8]  F. Barrantes,et al.  Kinetics of agonist-induced intrinsic fluorescence changes in membrane-bound acetylcholine receptor , 1976, Nature.

[9]  A. K. Solomon,et al.  Molecular specialization and symmetry in membrane function , 1978 .

[10]  D. Agard,et al.  Structural studies of a membrane-bound acetylcholine receptor from Torpedo californica. , 1977, Journal of molecular biology.

[11]  J P Changeux,et al.  Fast kinetic studies on the interaction of cholinergic agonists with the membrane-bound acetylcholine receptor from Torpedo marmorata as revealed by quinacrine fluorescence. , 1977, European journal of biochemistry.

[12]  J. Changeux,et al.  Comparison between the affinities for reversible cholinergic ligands of a purified and membrane bound state of the acetylcholine‐receptor protein from Electrophorus electricus , 1973, FEBS letters.

[13]  J. Changeux,et al.  Studies on the electrogenic action of acetylcholine with Torpedo marmorata electric organ. III. Pharmocological desensitization in vitro of the receptor-rich membrane fragments by cholinergic agonists. , 1976, Journal of molecular biology.

[14]  L. Magazanik,et al.  Desensitization at the Motor Endplate , 1973 .

[15]  J. Changeux,et al.  Interaction of a fluorescent ligand with membrane-bound cholinergic receptor from Torpedo marmorata. , 1973, Biochemistry.

[16]  J. Changeux,et al.  Studies on the electrogenic action of acetylcholine with Torpedo marmorata electric organ. IV. Quinacrine: a fluorescent probe for the conformational transitions of the cholinergic receptor protein in its membrane-bound state. , 1976, Journal of molecular biology.

[17]  L. Magazanik,et al.  Dependence of acetylcholine desensitization on the membrane potential of frog muscle fibre and on the ionic changes in the medium , 1970, The Journal of physiology.

[18]  J. Changeux,et al.  Reconstitution of a chemically excitable membrane. , 1974, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[19]  E. Neumann,et al.  Dynamic properties of isolated acetylcholine receptor protein: kinetics of the binding of acetylcholine and Ca ions. , 1976, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[20]  S. Blanchard,et al.  Ligand-induced conformation changes in Torpedo californica membrane-bound acetylcholine receptor. , 1978, Biochemistry.

[21]  J. Gerhart,et al.  The Effect of the Feedback Inhibitor, CTP, on Subunit Interactions in Aspartate Transcarbamylase , 1963 .

[22]  C. Chignell,et al.  Ligand interactions with cholinergic receptor-enriched membranes from Torpedo: influence of agonist exposure on receptor properties. , 1976, Molecular pharmacology.

[23]  P. Adams,et al.  Interaction of a fluorescent probe with acetylcholine-activated synaptic membrane , 1977, Nature.

[24]  D. Terrar,et al.  INFLUENCE OF SKF‐525A CONGENERS, STROPHANTHIDIN AND TISSUE‐CULTURE MEDIA ON DESENSITIZATION IN FROG SKELETAL MUSCLE , 1974, British journal of pharmacology.

[25]  B. Sakmann,et al.  Decamethonium both opens and blocks endplate channels. , 1978, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[26]  J. Changeux,et al.  Effects of local anesthetics and calcium on the interaction of cholinergic ligands with the nicotinic receptor protein from Torpedo marmorata. , 1974, Molecular pharmacology.

[27]  G. Vassent Multi-random binding molecular interactions: a general kinetic model. , 1974, Journal of theoretical biology.

[28]  J. Changeux,et al.  On Some Structural Analogies between Acetylcholinesterase and the Macromolecular Receptor of Acetylcholine , 1969, The Journal of general physiology.

[29]  E. Albuquerque,et al.  Acetylcholine receptor and ion conductance modulator sites at the murine neuromuscular junction: evidence from specific toxin reactions. , 1973, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[30]  B. Katz,et al.  A study of the ‘desensitization’ produced by acetylcholine at the motor end‐plate , 1957, The Journal of physiology.

[31]  J P Changeux,et al.  Binding of Naja nigricollis (3H)alpha-toxin to membrane fragments from Electrophorus and Torpedo electric organs. I. Binding of the tritiated alpha-neurotoxin in the absence of effector. , 1974, Molecular pharmacology.

[32]  J. Changeux,et al.  Interconversion between different states of affinity for acetylcholine of the cholinergic receptor protein from Torpedo marmorata. , 1975, European journal of biochemistry.

[33]  L. Potter,et al.  Ultrastructure of isolated membranes of Torpedo electric tissue. , 1973, Brain research.

[34]  L. Potter,et al.  Studies of the binding of α‐bungarotoxin to membrane‐bound and detergent‐dispersed acetylcholine receptors from Torpedo electric tissue , 1972, FEBS letters.

[35]  M. Schimerlik,et al.  Stopped flow kinetics of carbamylcholine binding to membrane bound acetylcholine receptor. , 1978, Biochemical and biophysical research communications.

[36]  J. Changeux,et al.  Responses of acetylcholinesterase from Torpedo marmorata to salts and curarizing drugs. , 1966, Molecular pharmacology.

[37]  J. Changeux,et al.  Recovery of some functional properties of the detergent-extracted cholinergic receptor protein from Torpedo marmorata after reintegration into a membrane environment. , 1978, European journal of biochemistry.

[38]  I. Karle,et al.  Histrionicotoxins: roentgen-ray analysis of the novel allenic and acetylenie spiroalkaloids isolated from a Colombian frog, Dendrobates histrionicus. , 1971, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[39]  J. Changeux,et al.  Conductance increases produced by bath application of cholinergic agonists to Electrophorus electroplaques , 1975, The Journal of general physiology.

[40]  M. Raftery,et al.  Propidium as a probe of acetylcholine receptor binding sites. , 1977, Archives of biochemistry and biophysics.

[41]  J P Changeux,et al.  On the nature of allosteric transitions: implications of non-exclusive ligand binding. , 1966, Journal of molecular biology.

[42]  J. Changeux,et al.  On the excitability and cooperativity of the electroplax membrane. , 1968, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[43]  E. Bartels Relationship between acetylcholine and local anesthetics. , 1965, Biochimica et Biophysica Acta.

[44]  B. Scubon-Mulieri,et al.  Desensitization and recovery at the frog neuromuscular junction , 1977, The Journal of general physiology.

[45]  E Neher,et al.  Conductance fluctuations and ionic pores in membranes. , 1977, Annual review of biophysics and bioengineering.

[46]  M. Schimerlik,et al.  Cholinergic ligand-induced affinity changes in Torpedo californica acetylcholine receptor. , 1977, Archives of biochemistry and biophysics.

[47]  H P Rang,et al.  On the mechanism of desensitization at cholinergic receptors. , 1970, Molecular pharmacology.

[48]  J. Changeux,et al.  Purification fromTorpedo marmorata electric tissue of membrane fragments particularly rich in cholinergic receptor protein , 1972, FEBS letters.

[49]  Y. Dupont X‐ray diffraction study of membrane fragments rich in acetylcholine receptor protein prepared from the electric organ of Torpedo Marmorata , 1974, FEBS letters.

[50]  J. Changeux,et al.  Large-scale purification of the acetylcholine-receptor protein in its membrane-bound and detergent-extracted forms from Torpedo marmorata electric organ. , 1977, European journal of biochemistry.

[51]  P. Gage Generation of end-plate potentials. , 1976, Physiological reviews.

[52]  S. W. Kuffler,et al.  The number of transmitter molecules in a quantum: an estimate from iontophoretic application of acetylcholine at the neuromuscular synapse. , 1975, The Journal of physiology.

[53]  Dynamic properties of isolated acetylcholine receptor proteins: release of calcium ions caused by acetylcholine binding. , 1976, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[54]  R. O'brien,et al.  Action of organophosphates on binding of cholinergic ligands , 1971 .

[55]  L. Magazanik,et al.  The effect of temperature on desensitization kinetics at the post‐synaptic membrane of the frog muscle fibre. , 1975, The Journal of physiology.

[56]  J. Changeux,et al.  Some structural properties of the cholinergic receptor protein in its membrane environmental relevant to its function as a pharmacological receptor. , 1976, Cold Spring Harbor symposia on quantitative biology.

[57]  D. Colquhoun,et al.  Effects of inhibitors of the binding of iodinated alpha-bungarotoxin to acetylcholine receptors in rat muscle. , 1976, Molecular pharmacology.

[58]  J. Changeux,et al.  Regulation of binding properties of the nicotinic receptor protein by cholinergic ligands in membrane fragments from Torpedo marmorata. , 1975, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[59]  D. Doyle,et al.  Pathogenesis of Human Muscular Dystrophies , 1978 .

[60]  C. Y. Lee,et al.  Elapid neurotoxins and their mode of action. , 1970, Clinical toxicology.

[61]  A. Eldefrawi,et al.  Cooperativities in the binding of acetylcholine to its receptor. , 1973, Biochemical pharmacology.

[62]  A. Rousselet,et al.  Fluidity of the lipids next to the acetylcholine receptor protein of torpedo membrane fragments. Use of amphiphilic reversible spin-labels. , 1977, Biochemistry.

[63]  J. Changeux,et al.  ON THE NATURE OF ALLOSTERIC TRANSITIONS: A PLAUSIBLE MODEL. , 1965, Journal of molecular biology.

[64]  A. Rousselet,et al.  Saturation transfer electron paramagnetic resonance on membrane bound proteins. II-Absence of rotational diffusion of the cholinergic receptor protein in Torpedo marmorata membrane fragments. , 1977, Biochemical and biophysical research communications.

[65]  J. Changeux,et al.  Purification and properties of the cholinergic receptor protein from Electrophorus electricus electric tissue. , 1974, European journal of biochemistry.

[66]  D. D. Thomas,et al.  Saturation transfer electron paramagnetic resonance on membrane-bound proteins. I-Rotational diffusion of rhodopsin in the visual receptor membrane. , 1977, Biochemical and biophysical research communications.

[67]  E. Neumann,et al.  Interaction of ligands with acetylcholinesterase. Use of temperature-jump relaxation kinetics in the binding of specific fluorescent ligands. , 1977, Biochemistry.

[68]  M. Schimerlik,et al.  A fluorescence probe of acetylcholine receptor conformation and local anesthetic binding. , 1976, Biochemical and biophysical research communications.

[69]  J. D. Del Castillo,et al.  Rapid desensitization of acetylcholine receptors of eel electroplaques following iontophoretic application of agonist compounds. , 1977, Journal of Physiology.

[70]  J. Changeux,et al.  Distinct protein components from Torpedo marmorata membranes carry the acetylcholine receptor site and the binding site for local anesthetics and histrionicotoxin. , 1978, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[71]  M. Raftery,et al.  Use of a fluorescent probe for the study of ligand binding by the isolated cholinergic receptor of Torpedo californica. , 1973, Biochemical and biophysical research communications.

[72]  E. Schoffeniels,et al.  An isolated single electroplax preparation. I. New data on the effect of acetylcholine and related compounds. , 1957, Biochimica et biophysica acta.

[73]  L. Magazanik Functional properties of postjunctional membrane. , 1976, Annual review of pharmacology and toxicology.

[74]  J. Gerhart A Discussion of the Regulatory Properties of Aspartate Transcarbamylase from Escherichia coli , 1970 .

[75]  J. Changeux,et al.  Synthesis of fluorescent acyl‐cholines with agonistic properties: pharmacological activity on Electrophorus electroplaque and interaction in vitro with Torpedo receptor‐rich membrane fragments , 1976, FEBS letters.

[76]  M. Eigen Diffusion Control in Biochemical Reactions , 1974 .

[77]  J. Changeux,et al.  Studies on the electrogenic action of acetylcholine with Torpedo marmorata electric organ. II. The permeability response of the receptor-rich membrane fragments to cholinergic agonists in vitro. , 1976, Journal of molecular biology.

[78]  M. Raftery,et al.  Fractionation and partial characterization of membrane particles from Torpedo californica electroplax. , 1973, Biochemistry.

[79]  O. H. Lowry,et al.  Protein measurement with the Folin phenol reagent. , 1951, The Journal of biological chemistry.