Are External Technology Sourcing Strategies Substitutes or Complements?: The Case of Embodied versus Disembodied Technology Acquisition

This paper analyzes the choice between different external technology sourcing activities of a firm. On the one hand, the firm can acquire new technology which is embodied in personnel. On the other hand, the firm can obtain new technology disembodied through a licensing agreement or by outsourcing the technology development from an R&D contractor. Building on Cassiman and Veugelers (2006), we test whether embodied and disembodied technology acquisitions are complementary activities or rather behave as substitute technology acquisition alternatives. We find that while internal and external technology acquisition are complementary innovation activities, the actual choice of external technology sourcing between embodied or disembodied modes is substitutive for smaller firms. The evidence for larger firms suggests that different external technology sourcing activities are complementary, but in this case the results are suggestive although not strongly significant.

[1]  Paul Milgrom,et al.  Complementarities and fit strategy, structure, and organizational change in manufacturing , 1995 .

[2]  CassimanBruno,et al.  In Search of Complementarity in Innovation Strategy , 2006 .

[3]  R. Veugelers,et al.  COMPLEMENTARITY BETWEEN TECHNOLOGY MAKE AND BUY IN INNOVATION STRATEGIES : EVIDENCE FROM BELGIAN MANUFACTURING FIRMS , 1998 .

[4]  Sanford J. Grossman,et al.  The Costs and Benefits of Ownership: A Theory of Vertical and Lateral Integration , 1986 .

[5]  Deb Chatterji,et al.  Accessing External Sources of Technology , 1996 .

[6]  M. Carree,et al.  Cooperative R&D and Firm Performance , 2004 .

[7]  S. Athey,et al.  An Empirical Framework for Testing Theories About Complimentarity in Organizational Design , 1998 .

[8]  A. Arora.  Testing for complementarities in reduced-form regressions: A note , 1996 .

[9]  D. Teece.  Profiting from technological innovation: Implications for integration, collaboration, licensing and public policy , 1993 .

[10]  A. Arora,et al.  Evaluating technological information and utilizing it: Scientific knowledge, technological capability, and external linkages in biotechnology , 1994 .

[11]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  Innovation and Learning: The Two Faces of R&D , 1989 .

[12]  Hans Gersbach,et al.  Endogenous Technological Spillovers: Causes and Consequences , 2003 .

[13]  D. Jorgenson.  The Rate and Direction of Inventive Activity. , 1963 .

[14]  Z. Ács,et al.  Innovation, Market Structure, and Firm Size , 1987 .

[15]  Mark Dodgson,et al.  Technology Strategies in Small Firms , 1991 .

[16]  Paul R. Milgrom,et al.  The Economics of Modern Manufacturing: Technology, Strategy, and Organization , 1990 .

[17]  O. Williamson,et al.  The Economic Institutions of Capitalism: Firms, Markets, Relational Contracting. , 1986, American Political Science Review.

[18]  Wesley M. Cohen,et al.  Empirical studies of innovation and market structure , 1989 .

[19]  K. Arrow.  Economic Welfare and the Allocation of Resources for Invention , 1962 .

[20]  I. Cockburn,et al.  Absorptive Capacity, Coauthoring Behavior, and the Organization of Research in Drug Discovery , 2003 .

[21]  K. Pavitt.  Sectoral Patterns of Technical Change : Towards a Taxonomy and a Theory : Research Policy , 1984 .

[22]  E. Bohlin,et al.  External Technology Acquisition in Large Multi-Technology Corporations , 1992 .

[23]  A. Arora,et al.  COMPLEMENTARITY AND EXTERNAL LINKAGES: THE STRATEGIES OF THE LARGE FIRMS IN BIOTECHNOLOGY* , 1990 .

[24]  Reinhilde Veugelers,et al.  Complementarity in the Innovation Strategy: Internal R&D, External Technology Acquisition, and Cooperation in R&D , 2002 .

[25]  Raymond De Bondt,et al.  Spillovers and innovative activities , 1997 .

[26]  D. Mowery,et al.  Technology and the pursuit of economic growth , 1991 .

[27]  T. Allen.  Managing the flow of technology , 1977 .

[28]  Bruno Crépon,et al.  Research, Innovation, and Productivity: an Econometric Analysis at the Firm Level , 1998 .

[29]  Alfonso Gambardella.  Competitive Advantages from In-House Basic Research: , 1992 .

[30]  Reinhilde Veugelers,et al.  In Search of Complementarity in Innovation Strategy: Internal R&D and External Knowledge Acquisition , 2006, Manag. Sci..